rotherham_red
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Messages
- 7,420
Interesting, where did you find this mate?
D-Von get the helicopter.
Interesting, where did you find this mate?
D-Von get the helicopter.
People keep saying he's a journalist when he really isn't. He's just a former footballer who's a pundit on ESPN and has connections to German and Norwegian sources.Jan-Aage Fjorthoft will have something to say for sure, and then maybe Christian Falk will even tell us about its epistemological status.
'Sancho is the next Juan Mata'
D-Von get the helicopter.
I remember Mata actually being just as sprightly over the first few yards as Sancho is now. Old Mata and current one are almost completely different players.Isn't he just straight up faster / stronger? I don't recall Mata ever being particularly quick.
Sancho is quicker and more mobile, that's for sure. But stylistically there's a similarity because both players cut in field when deployed in a wide forward role. So both players end up occupying the half space in central areas.Isn't he just straight up faster / stronger? I don't recall Mata ever being particularly quick.
They literally devalidated their claim by using that comparison. Sancho doesn't look like he's pulling a sled in the Iditarod when he runs around the pitch.
D-Von get the helicopter.
Stay clear then
D-Von get the helicopter.
Mata's issue at United was his pace or lack of it. So no problem here.Stay clear then
I thought that was pretty clear from how he plays a Mata 0.2.'Sancho is the next Juan Mata'
Big day today@Pexbo is late this morning.
Big day today
All the more reason for it to be immaterial whether it completes now or after Euros.
3rd time luckyGenuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
You've just made the 99.9% bit up. At 99.8% I believed it.Has anyone considered that the article saying he's 99.9% Mata is just a made up story?
No source was given with it.
Genuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
To be honest its more like this place has a real paranoia about every player coming hereHe's a product of British football. He's been built with the PL in mind since he was a child. There's really no reason why he won't thrive here, if players like Rashford and Foden can, why couldn't Sancho? He's been highly rated since he was about 16, viewed as the next best thing by plenty, his rise is not a surprise, it was going to be a bigger surprise if he'd not made it. This place has a real paranoia about players coming from Dortmund.
Genuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
Mkhi's talent was never in doubt, he was mentally fragile and had a destructive manager that ruined his confidence.Genuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
I don't think its made up, however its yet another algo/stat thing that shouldn't be given too much importance to.Has anyone considered that the article saying he's 99.9% Mata is just a made up story?
No source was given with it.
Foden is too high. Nobody values him higher than HaalandI don't think its made up, however its yet another algo/stat thing that shouldn't be given too much importance to.
Here's another similar one
Yup, exactly!Foden is too high. Nobody values him higher than Haaland
Isn't he just straight up faster / stronger? I don't recall Mata ever being particularly quick.
Genuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
I think your perception is a bit coined by the players United signed from Bundesliga. Personally, I believe United is the English club with the biggest difference in how they approach the coaching part in comparison to most Bundesliga teams. It is difficult for players who are used to a much more organized team structure to shine in the same way when they're suddenly not playing in a very well organized team with clear patterns of play and automatisms anymore. Sancho will be no different. Qualitywise he's on a another level to probably every player bar maybe de Bruyne that moved from the Bundesliga to the EPL but it still will be an issue.
It took Mkhitaryan two years to hit his stride in Dortmund under a very nurturing coach in Klopp. Only in his third year was he able to consistently produce and had his standout season that prompted United to sign him. So the warning signs were there and it was by no means a surprise that he did not prosper right from the start and under Mourinho no less. You basically got one and a half of his mediocre years out of him without giving him the chance for the third one that he had in Dortmund.Genuine question - what suggests he would do any better here than Mkhitaryan did? Perhaps people who have watched him more often can answer. Pretty much his entire professional career has been in Germany where countless players put up good numbers then struggle elsewhere. I know he is British and all but I am not convinced he will come here and thrive to be honest.
So you have been part of the coaching staff with Dortmund? Or with LVG and Jose?
I have actually seen that Jose and LVG were very organised with their team structure. What structure did Julian Favre have?
Foden is too high. Nobody values him higher than Haaland
Personally, I believe United is the English club with the biggest difference in how they approach the coaching part in comparison to most Bundesliga teams. It is difficult for players who are used to a much more organized team structure to shine in the same way when they're suddenly not playing in a very well organized team with clear patterns of play and automatisms anymore.
Your tone can get rather condescending. Claiming that United have a "difference in how they approach the coaching" compared to other clubs is pretty bold and I don't think that claim would really stand. You could maybe argue about Ole, but generalizing your point to a whole club is just asking for justified backlash.I see you're a real expert on the topic. Anyway, if your best arguments are two coaches who are relics of the past this tells more about your point than about mine.