amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Grealish and Sancho sound just about perfect for us.He's up there for sure. For me, provided Bruno signs and Pogba stays, RW is the priority.
Grealish and Sancho sound just about perfect for us.He's up there for sure. For me, provided Bruno signs and Pogba stays, RW is the priority.
I know that, was just specifically wondering about the wording since I thought he was simply half-Irish because of his parents rather than the grandfather rule stuff. Because of his parents he could have been registered at birth as Irish as well as English which makes it all a moot point but maybe he wasn't which is why I brought it up. Not really important, more me being curious.He had the choice and switched to England. Caused a bit of a stink when he was younger
Add another striker to that and we could finally ship off Sanchez, Lingard, Mata and Pereira whilst overall upgrading the quality of the squad dramatically.Grealish and Sancho sound just about perfect for us.
You’re talking 200m at leastAdd another striker to that and we could finally ship off Sanchez, Lingard, Mata and Pereira whilst overall upgrading the quality of the squad dramatically.
You’re talking 200m at least
Can he cut it as a pure center mid, next to McTominay holding and with Bruno Fernandes being the 10? Grealish always struck me as the guy who should be the 10. With Bruno Fernandes in, I dont see them fitting well together anymore.Grealish is a left winger in the same way that Gerrard was a right winger.
Grealish will go back to being a midfielder under different squad circumstances. And he'll be as excellent there as he has been from out wide.
We should sell Pogba as he has, through his agent, made his feelings known and get someone who is committed to the cause. As for where to play both him and Fernandez as attacking midfielders I would play them both in a 4-4-2 with Rashford and Martial/Greenwood as the two strikers.If Pogba goes then I agree. Which he likely will. If he stays then Pogba, Grealish & Fernandes would all be too many attacking midfielders. Especially as we usually play with none
I know that, was just specifically wondering about the wording since I thought he was simply half-Irish because of his parents rather than the grandfather rule stuff. Because of his parents he could have been registered at birth as Irish as well as English which makes it all a moot point but maybe he wasn't which is why I brought it up. Not really important, more me being curious.
Could still pick Ireland if he wants. Southgate hasn't chosen him yet, prefering Chelsea boys instead and it wouldn't surprise me if Lingard is still ahead of him.
Sancho and Graelish would elevate us to a high level, but unfortunately for us we'd have to pay close to £100m each for them (probably more for sancho). For sancho it was quite clear from his 6 months at Dortmund he was special, but no movement from us. Graelish riskier but I watched him in the championship final Villa lost on 2018 and he was the best player on the pitch.
We don't really do Mane or Salah type signings any more for some reason - cheaper players that are good at other clubs but haven't become world class yet. For example St Maxim at Newcastle and Buendia at Norwich are two who from what I've seen this season could make the jump - obviously I could be wrong but a manager and DOF and transfers board should be looking at those types of players and judging if they can make the step up. We instead seem to be going for £80m defenders and midfielders, with seldom ever any actual decent attacking options. Dan James is sort of the right signing but we should be looking at a slightly higher level at £30-£40m players.
I wish we did sign Sancho and Graelish but we can't afford both, the ship has sailed. We should be following Klopp's footprint and signing £30-£40m players like Mane, Salah, Wjnaldum, Ox etc that we believe can make the step up. Even Spurs basically built their CL runners up squad with those types of signings. I don't know why but our transfer strategy of the last 5-6 years has basically been signing expensive flavours of the months.
Its a tough ask to fund those two deals but both players are the sort of players that Fergie would make sure he gets. Maybe if we conduct a fire sale of our deadwood we could raise something like £50m and maybe raise another £30m by selling Deano, with a buy back clause of course, which should give us £80m plus whatever we would get from the Pogba sale and the budgeted summer expenditure. If we sign only three players then its got to be Sancho, Grealish and a DM; if we pull it off we move several levels up in terms of strength.Bruno Fernandes at £40m plus before add ons is a good start if we are talking about getting the Mane or Salah type signings, continental players who are not yet world class but got the ability to be one and does not come with the English tax fees. and I agree with you a decent Director of Football should be able to identify these type of players more.
However talking about easy signings that would make us a much better side, then of course Grealish and Sancho would be the obvious choices here. we are crying for a top class right winger for 6 years now in Sancho and someone like Grealish, a proper footballer who got character to go on with his ability would be a massive upgrade from the likes of Andreas, Mata and Lingard. Sancho is going to cost us £100m and Grealish now is at least £60m and that's probably all we will get from the Pogba sale. and we still need another holding midfielder and striker. that's probably another £100m.
I don't think McTominay is a holder in any way, shape or form. Both Scot and Fred are fantastic at defending the space in front of them, but terrible at defending the space behind them. So, I'd probably want to buy a new DM.Can he cut it as a pure center mid, next to McTominay holding and with Bruno Fernandes being the 10? Grealish always struck me as the guy who should be the 10. With Bruno Fernandes in, I dont see them fitting well together anymore.
I agree, but in how we've been set up this year, this is pretty much how Ole is looking at it. McTominay as a ball winning midfielder essentially, his partner being more a holding midfielder, with a 10 in front. That can easily change to normal 3 man midfield, but given the personnel, McTominay and Bruno Fernandes are 2 of the 3. We just spent so much on Bruno, the plan is going to be to use him, no point making potential plans that don't include him.I don't think McTominay is a holder in any way, shape or form. Both Scot and Fred are fantastic at defending the space in front of them, but terrible at defending the space behind them. So, I'd probably want to buy a new DM.
The thing about our squad is that there's almost zero creativity. We wouldn't be successful playing Liverpool's midfield because our fullbacks aren't productive enough for to balance them out. And we wouldn't be successful playing PSG's midfield because our front 3 aren't creative enough to make chances for themselves.
United would ideally have 3 hard-working, inventive midfielders. Could Grealish be one of those 3? I think he can. He's played in midfield lots of times in the PL and Championship and has the workrate to do it at Old Trafford. He's a top player who Aston Villa rely on to make things happen at the business end of the pitch. But he's equally good a little deeper, imo.
I honestly have no idea about Bruno. I may change my mind after watching him for a bit.
He hasn't played a competitive match for England yet so he wouldn't be switching.He can’t chose Ireland again. If you’ve played competitive internationals at youth level for a nation you can make one switch to another nation. He registered it with FIFA. Players that flip flop a lot do so because they’ll only play in friendlies. I think Southgate will select him in the next break. He’d never really done enough to warrant a call up previously.
We've already got McTominay and Bruno.I've actually changed my mind about him. Used to prefer Maddison but having watched him a lot this season. He's really come into his own and makes the game look easy. He's still a cnut but every team needs one of them.
We've already got McTominay and Bruno.
Imagine those three in midfield.
They'd be a Tri-cnut-erate.
With Bruno do we still need this guy? He or Bruno are not bench options and are good enough to start. The only way we can start both players is if we change formation to a 4-3-3 but then we would need a solid DM of starting quality at the back of them.
That isn't the reason he gets fouled alot though. He's very similar to Pogba in the sense that he likes to hold onto the ball under pressure and try to dribble his way out. He's got great close control and quite strong when being challenged, and decent acceleration to get away. I'd say his style is closest to Eden Hazard who was also the most fouled man in Europe over many seasons.The 'fouled' stat often gets overlooked on this forum because of how open to interpretation it can be. For strikers, it usually means they're good at jumping for headers against CBs. For pacey wingers, it usually means they're good at knocking the ball past the fullback and running onto it.
But Grealish falls into neither category. For him, it's very much about his close control and dribbling in tight areas.
This is a screenshot of the most fouled players in England. But Grealish is actually also the most fouled player in all of Europe. As an outball for a counterattacking team, he'd be fantastic:
https://abload.de
In theory, especially if villa go down, he will be the most gettable tooHe's the one I really want in the summer.
I like this and would be my ideal. Having someone as attacking as Williams at FB and the 2nd forward having the propensity to drift wide, it would be a quality midfieldAn outstanding DM is key, but there is also an option to play in a MF diamond, with Bruno at the head, but that position could easily be interchangable with Grealish.
...........Fernandes.........
Grealish.......McTominay
.............. DM...............
Personally, I think this would be a much better option for United than trying to play with three forwards, and getting overrun in Midfield.
Best hope Watford beat us thenI think we’ll get this done if Villa go down. Seems to make too much sense.
Him over Maddison. He's got that Manchester United aura around him that we've been missing for a long time.
Bit of a fantasy land scenario, but Grealish, Sancho & the right manager and we'd be back imo. Spend the following couple of years adding quality here and there and we've got something good on our hands, not to mention the likes of Mejbri & Garner, who I think both look nailed on to make it here.
An outstanding DM is key, but there is also an option to play in a MF diamond, with Bruno at the head, but that position could easily be interchangable with Grealish.
...........Fernandes.........
Grealish.......McTominay
.............. DM...............
Personally, I think this would be a much better option for United than trying to play with three forwards, and getting overrun in Midfield.
I think we’ll get this done if Villa go down. Seems to make too much sense.
Soumare seems more attainable. Think Ndidi would cost a lot more and I don’t see Leicester giving him up if Maddison leavesDo you think someone like Saul who would admittedly be big money suit this position or were you looking at more of a natural fit for this position such as an Ndidi/Soumare?
Definitely, Villa are not cash rich like Leicester so will be willing to negotiate.
Grealish looks a real talent, sell Pogba get him in at least he will play for the badge.
If we can get him, we would have signed Maguire, Bruno, Grealiish all with real leadership qualities.
Do you think someone like Saul who would admittedly be big money suit this position or were you looking at more of a natural fit for this position such as an Ndidi/Soumare?
I think we’d play him deeper. He doesn’t look like a 10 to me like Bruno does.Why do you think this? When we've just signed a player in his position for a fair wad of wonger?
Me too. He's a leader and a really good player.I want that player. He is a leader.