el diablorojo
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 889
- Supports
- Brentford
Greenwood ?
Would fail our “no d***heads” policy - so it’s a no from us
Greenwood ?
Unfortunately they're the only companies willing to spend big money on the ad slots so it's a double edged sword.Yup. Had this conversation with my dad so many times. The amount of betting ads in and around football (all sports, really) is ridiculous. Every time Sky Sports goes to an ad break, there is at least one betting ad. This shit should be banned.
Betting ads are the 'new' tobacco sponsorshipYup. Had this conversation with my dad so many times. The amount of betting ads in and around football (all sports, really) is ridiculous. Every time Sky Sports goes to an ad break, there is at least one betting ad. This shit should be banned.
It would be smart business to get him on the cheap and someone else. It'd have to be a big cut price though.Now is the time to offer to buy him for half the price.
Yup. Had this conversation with my dad so many times. The amount of betting ads in and around football (all sports, really) is ridiculous. Every time Sky Sports goes to an ad break, there is at least one betting ad. This shit should be banned.
That was also Fergie's modelBecause our fans are now accustomed to finding “value in the market” after being conditioned by the Glazers model.
Rio comparisons feel apt. Both cases where it seems highly likely nothing particularly nefarious was going on but what the players did was also the same crime that someone doing something extremely nefarious would commit, so the punishment has to reflect that.
For clarity, I'm saying it's highly unlikely he hid actions that would've given him an unfair advantage over his competitors (I'm not sure about it, just the impression I've got without ever looking in to it in depth). I find the suggestions he was hiding recreational drug use easy to believe.Is it really highly likely Rio wasn't doing anything nefarious?
Leaves Southgate looking a bit stupid, insisting on selecting him for squads over the past season after Toney had admitted his guilt.
Yet he wasted no time in insisting that Greenwood would never play for England again. Seems he has one rule for some offenders and not for others.
For clarity, I'm saying it's highly unlikely he hid actions that would've given him an unfair advantage over his competitors (I'm not sure about it, just the impression I've got without ever looking in to it in depth). I find the suggestions he was hiding recreational drug use easy to believe.
The club needs to decide what they're going to do about him ASAP, they've had plenty of time to sort out all the ins and outsGreenwood ?
Wtf is this?Leaves Southgate looking a bit stupid, insisting on selecting him for squads over the past season after Toney had admitted his guilt.
Yet he wasted no time in insisting that Greenwood would never play for England again. Seems he has one rule for some offenders and not for others.
Leaves Southgate looking a bit stupid, insisting on selecting him for squads over the past season after Toney had admitted his guilt.
Yet he wasted no time in insisting that Greenwood would never play for England again. Seems he has one rule for some offenders and not for others.
Leaves Southgate looking a bit stupid, insisting on selecting him for squads over the past season after Toney had admitted his guilt.
Yet he wasted no time in insisting that Greenwood would never play for England again. Seems he has one rule for some offenders and not for others.
Rio comparisons feel apt. Both cases where it seems highly likely nothing particularly nefarious was going on but what the players did was also the same crime that someone doing something extremely nefarious would commit, so the punishment has to reflect that.
You're asking why someone accused of rape, domestic violence and threats to kill was treated differently to someone accused of gambling inappropriately?
Someone looks stupid, but it isn't Southgate.
Just in time for the Liverpool match.
Dier should have gotten the keys to the city.Does my head in. And Dier got a slap on the wrist for charging into the stands to assault a fan.
Did it say what he bet on, games he played in, transfers or games he had no involvement in, also how many came in? Would it be different in an employee buying shares in their work place if you know they have a good product?
No, a factory worker like myself believes in a product that said company is making, decides to put a few pound on product, insider as working on it but no clue if it comes off, my question is what did he bet on, Brentford to lose?You mean insider trading?
Just in time for his Liverpool debutJust in time for the Liverpool match.
That isn't insider tradingYou mean insider trading?
Certainly but we'll be while waiting for that.I wish they come down hard on City and their 115 FFP STEALS just like they did on Toney!
Now is the time to offer to buy him for half the price.
You're asking why someone accused of rape, domestic violence and threats to kill was treated differently to someone accused of gambling inappropriately?
Someone looks stupid, but it isn't Southgate.