Acole9
Outstanding
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 12,507
So do I. I wouldn't be at all surprised if this gets done on deadline day or the day before.Late bid will go in for him. Still think he will be playing here after international break.
So do I. I wouldn't be at all surprised if this gets done on deadline day or the day before.Late bid will go in for him. Still think he will be playing here after international break.
I never said they refused to sell, Inter owners had a price and didn't budge no matter what. Very easy for Suning to refuse our offers.Perisic had a price. Inter didn't refuse to sell, they set a price. United didn't want him bad enough to pay it
Nah, too late for that. Bid should have already gone in, inter won't sell if they can't replace him
Who is not a replacement for PerisicInter is very close to Keita Baldè
Flogging a dead horse.....fecks sake, is this thread still rumbling on?
Flogging a dead horse.....
I don't recall you being a necromancer?!Let the horse run free!
I don't recall you being a necromancer?!
Wizard is magic, a necromancer raises and controls the dead. A wizard has magic, a necromancer has magic and strength of will....A wizard? Or perhaps we know different definitions?
Very reliable
Let's be honest, If we wanted Perisic that bad, we would have signed him a while ago.
Deal is still possible, but to say that we went all in and failed is laughable. We probably decided that for the miney being asked., we are better off waiting until the winter/summer
What exactly are you basing this on?Only a few days to go but everything already been sorted accept the price and by all accounts we were already close. Wouldn't take much to push this over the line if both parties agree.
Based on what Simon Stone of the BBC tweeted. He said, "United were close to a fee but Inter dug their heels in"What exactly are you basing this on?
In fact all reports point to the contrary.
United made one bid far below what Inter wanted and never came back for him again.
Which is the same state we supposedly were in 4 weeks ago.Based on what Simon Stone of the BBC tweeted. He said, "United were close to a fee but Inter dug their heels in"
Simon Mullock thinks we're still trying to sign him.Which is the same state we supposedly were in 4 weeks ago.
This move ain't happening.
It's been dead in the water for at least a month now.
We won't.Simon Mullock thinks we're still trying to sign him.
Wether you trust Di Marzio or anybody else is irrelevant to what I'm saying. We're dealing with Inter who are owned by a group that is wealthier than us. They have a price and won't budge.We won't.
We have made one solitary bid according to Di Marzio. That was almost two months ago. I'd trust Do Marzio over Italian league transfers than this Mullock fellow.
Which is not a bad thing.Wether you trust Di Marzio or anybody else is irrelevant to what I'm saying. We're dealing with Inter who are owned by a group that is wealthier than us. They have a price and won't budge.
Being 'dead in the water' is good news for Inter.Which is not a bad thing.
We won't budge either,(rightfully so ) so this is dead in the water.
What exactly are you basing this on?
In fact all reports point to the contrary.
United made one bid far below what Inter wanted and never came back for him again.
It's not bad news for us either.Being 'dead in the water' is good news for Inter.