Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Depends on if you treat various justification strategies as support:




Then there was a (now deleted) post that read:
Palestinians are now dehumanized to the point where some don't even think they should have the right to self defense.

All of this was in the context of the rocket attacks.

Couldn't disagree more. I don't see any of those posts as support for hamas.
 
I wouldn’t be surprised that coverage of the current events is ‘below the fold’ in any US media, it just doesn’t rise to the level of import for the country right now by most metrics, regardless of political ideology of the media source. This current conflict seemed to be rather limited from a visual perspective until the rocket attacks.

That’s unfortunate, but it’s the reality.
:wenger:

If this sentence wasn't so batshit stupid, I'd think it was satire.
 
Where are you going with this?
You approve of aggression against the Jewish people for occupying a very small area that has huge historical and spiritual significance for them?
Without a home, the Jewish people are without an identity. What is a nation without a home?
What about the Canaanites who were there for about 3000-4000 years? They've held the land for the longest period in recorded history. Most of the offshoots of the Canaanite diaspora are living in modern day Lebanon - should they have a home there?
 
:wenger:

If this sentence wasn't so batshit stupid, I'd think it was satire.
You have to think about what sells in my country media wise.

Sensationalism tends to sell. Rocket attacks will get views & clicks.

I’m not condoning how this is portrayed in our media, I’m discussing how it plays to our populace.
 
Well, I do and it seems there's little more to say.

So support for the intolerable situation the Palestinians find them put in due to the Israeli actions is a support for Hamas?

Israel are the occupying force, they have to be held accountable for their actions. Attacking a place of worship while the people inside were doing nothing but praying is what caused these latest protests.
 
So 3?

9 CHILDREN were killed today by Israeli air strike among the 28 civilian deaths.

Does the number need to be equal to make them both condemned??

The way I see it, both launching rockets without care of the targets; one side defend better, the other is not.
 
Last edited:
@Sweet Square
So you approve of rocket barrages on civilian targets?
Why are you even asking this ? It comes across as some bizarre performative shtick. No one in this thread thinks rocket barrages at civilians is a good thing.

How on earth is that defending Palestinians in Jerusalem? And how is it dehumanizing to say that Hamas/PIJ shouldn't have done that?

Edit: fecked off and deleted the post
I was trying to reply to someone saying they believe Palestinians have the right to protest, like the recent events are somehow similar to a anti glazer protest, Palestinians have the right to take up armed struggle and my post wasn't in anyway connected to the rocket attacks(Didn't even know it had happened until later on). I deleted the post because I forgot to quote the user and it was looking like a lost cause anyway. Plus I fecked off because I had just found a giant bag of Haribo
 
Last edited:
Does the number need to be equal to make them both condemned??

The way I see it, both launching rockets without care of the targets; one side defend better, the other is not.

There is nothing equal in Israel.

3 Israelis murdered by rockets, 28 murdered in retaliation. 9 of them children.
 
We're talking about people who's movement is controlled, blockaded, mostly unarmed. Open air prison if you like in some parts. They are being occupied by an army that shoot dead kids throwing rocks in what are called "clashes". You don't have to be a Hamas supporter to understand that firing rockets is a desperate means of retaliation. They absolutely have the right for an armed resistance but how and with what.
 
Imagine the irony of Isreal doing to Palestinians what thr Nazis did to Jews in the 1930s, turfing them out of their homes, raiding their places of worship. I seen the EU has condemned the rocket attacks from the West Bank but ignored Isreals actions. Why aren't they condemning Isreal?
 
We're talking about people who's movement is controlled, blockaded, mostly unarmed. Open air prison if you like in some parts. They are being occupied by an army that shoot dead kids throwing rocks in what are called "clashes". You don't have to be a Hamas supporter to understand that firing rockets is a desperate means of retaliation. They absolutely have the right for an armed resistance but how and with what.

This.
 
You're only seeing things from a Palestinian perspective. My guess is that it is because you're a Muslim, and so you feel personally affected. Yes?
I'm not a Jew or Muslim, so I see the provocation from both sides, and condemn both equally.

Or you’re just a blinded bigot and don’t see it. See it equally my ass.

Anyone with zero bias would see this situation for what it is. Fair enough if you’re overall opinion on the conflict may be sided towards Israel but this current conflict is very easy to assess for a true neutral. Hamas absolutely have the right to try to defend their people when everyone else just seems to sit there and watch it all play out.
 
You're only seeing things from a Palestinian perspective. My guess is that it is because you're a Muslim, and so you feel personally affected. Yes?
I'm not a Jew or Muslim, so I see the provocation from both sides, and condemn both equally.
Everyone who disagrees with me must be biased, but I’m definitely impartial and therefore definitely right. Cool.

I am neither Jewish nor Muslim and disagree with you. I have Jewish friends who disagree with you. What now?

This gatekeeping is only for people who don’t have confidence to argue their own opinions on the merits
 
the "both side" argument was never accepted when talking about the white supremacist, and should never be accepted when talking about Israel occupation of Palestine.
 
Or you’re just a blinded bigot and don’t see it. See it equally my ass.

Anyone with zero bias would see this situation for what it is. Fair enough if you’re overall opinion on the conflict may be sided towards Israel but this current conflict is very easy to assess for a true neutral. Hamas absolutely have the right to try to defend their people when everyone else just seems to sit there and watch it all play out.

Bolded is important. I take the Israeli position generally but you have to be some kind of an anti-Arab racist if you still try to defend them on this one. I don't think it's contradictory and there should be plenty of people like me out there.
 
Does the number need to be equal to make them both condemned??

The way I see it, both launching rockets without care of the targets; one side defend better, the other is not.

One side is the clear aggressor and initiated an attack on unarmed civilians in a mosque.

How someone can look at it as one side just being 'bad at defense' I can't believe.

True colors of so called moderate thinkers really come to the forefront with such conflicts.
 
BTW Joe Biden has just made clear we stand with the Israeli cause and ask for de-escalation. So the mother's of the children who died are spared y'all!
 
The rockets thing is the biggest crock of whataboutist bullshit you can get. Who is advocating for rocket attacks on civilians? Anyone? How many people have died as a result of them compared to the the numbers posted by the IDF systematically slaughtering innocents on a daily weekly monthly every fecking year? Tryng to draw the 'both sides' picture here is pathetic. One side has all the power and is using it in front of everyone's eyes for apartheid and ethnic cleansing.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ROCKETS?!?!?

feck off
it's like that in every fight between a lightweight and a heavyweight. The weaker side always pays with blood.
 
it's getting kinda hard to not equal the treatment to the Palestinian with the Jews during the war when the Israeli govt come up with this shite
 
Is the justification for Israel that "we were removed from our countries so we'll make our own and remove those already here, but it's less than the amount of Jews removed 70 years ago so it doesn't matter."

I know so little about this all unfortunately but the more and more I see the more I struggle to understand how major governments are defending the Israeli regime.

People seem to like to throw out 'but Hamas' because they are known terrorists without actually considering why they are taking the actions they are. Without that defence the palestinians would be long gone.
 
Where are you going with this?
You approve of aggression against the Jewish people for occupying a very small area that has huge historical and spiritual significance for them?
Without a home, the Jewish people are without an identity. What is a nation without a home?
The Canaanites say hi.
 
Why are you even asking this ? It comes across as some bizarre performative shtick. No one in this thread thinks rocket barrages at civilians is a good thing.
Justifiable or neglectable, not good. That has been repeatedly said, another one two posts below yours now.
I was trying to reply to someone saying they believe Palestinians have the right to protest, like the recent events are somehow similar to a anti glazer protest, Palestinians have the right to take up armed struggle and my post wasn't in anyway connected to the rocket attacks(Didn't even know it had happened until later on). I deleted the post because I forgot to quote the user and it was looking like a lost cause anyway. Plus I fecked off because I had just found a giant bag of Haribo
It goes on since Monday, and the thread was full of it... hard to believe you've not heard about it (or Israeli airstrikes for that matter) by that time anywhere.
 
Last edited:
So support for the intolerable situation the Palestinians find them put in due to the Israeli actions is a support for Hamas?

Israel are the occupying force, they have to be held accountable for their actions. Attacking a place of worship while the people inside were doing nothing but praying is what caused these latest protests.
I don't think this has much to do with what I wrote. My take on the overall situation is in the second half of post #1915.
 
I had the news on in the background last night, and there was nothing on this till 10.20 (20 minutes of other stuff beforehand). Even then it was a 3 minute segment and very much framed as, these are the the Hamas rockets being fired into Israel, then worked backwards to what happened before that.
 
Is the justification for Israel that "we were removed from our countries so we'll make our own and remove those already here, but it's less than the amount of Jews removed 70 years ago so it doesn't matter."

I know so little about this all unfortunately but the more and more I see the more I struggle to understand how major governments are defending the Israeli regime.

People seem to like to throw out 'but Hamas' because they are known terrorists without actually considering why they are taking the actions they are. Without that defence the palestinians would be long gone.

I wouldn't say that Hamas are regarded as defenders of the Palestinians. It's an elected governing body in Gaza that dismisses the legitimacy of Israeli government. Palestinians wouldn't be long gone without Hamas.
It's a very complicated situation with political and religious connotations and deep rooted resentments.
 
Bolded is important. I take the Israeli position generally but you have to be some kind of an anti-Arab racist if you still try to defend them on this one. I don't think it's contradictory and there should be plenty of people like me out there.
What's your position on what's happened over the last few days?
 
Is the justification for Israel that "we were removed from our countries so we'll make our own and remove those already here, but it's less than the amount of Jews removed 70 years ago so it doesn't matter."

No.
 
I wouldn't say that Hamas are regarded as defenders of the Palestinians. It's an elected governing body in Gaza that dismisses the legitimacy of Israeli government. Palestinians wouldn't be long gone without Hamas.
It's a very complicated situation with political and religious connotations and deep rooted resentments.

Again I'm not in the know but your final sentence sounds like a really easy(lazy) way to justify the actions of the Israelis in removing a people from their land.

The Palestinians have less fire power and ability to defend themselves than ever without Hamas though don't they?