Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Oh look, Fearful, the insecure attention seeking troll is here.
 
Israeli court paves way for eviction of 1,000 Palestinians from West Bank area
Land to be repurposed for military use in one of the biggest expulsion decisions since 1967 occupation


After a two-decade legal battle, Israel’s high court has ruled that about 1,000 Palestinians can be evicted from an area of the West Bank and the land repurposed for Israeli military use, in one of the single biggest expulsion decisions since the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began in 1967.

About 3,000 hectares of Masafer Yatta, a rural area of the south Hebron hills under full Israeli control and home to several small Palestinian villages, was designated as a “firing zone” by the Israeli state in the 1980s. Firing zones are used for military exercises, and the presence of civilians is prohibited.

According to the Geneva conventions pertaining to humanitarian treatment in war, it is illegal to expropriate occupied land for purposes that do not benefit the people living there, or to forcibly transfer the local population.

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/05/israeli-court-evict-1000-palestinians-west-bank-area

The cnuts are stealing more land.
 
Israeli court paves way for eviction of 1,000 Palestinians from West Bank area
Land to be repurposed for military use in one of the biggest expulsion decisions since 1967 occupation


After a two-decade legal battle, Israel’s high court has ruled that about 1,000 Palestinians can be evicted from an area of the West Bank and the land repurposed for Israeli military use, in one of the single biggest expulsion decisions since the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began in 1967.

About 3,000 hectares of Masafer Yatta, a rural area of the south Hebron hills under full Israeli control and home to several small Palestinian villages, was designated as a “firing zone” by the Israeli state in the 1980s. Firing zones are used for military exercises, and the presence of civilians is prohibited.

According to the Geneva conventions pertaining to humanitarian treatment in war, it is illegal to expropriate occupied land for purposes that do not benefit the people living there, or to forcibly transfer the local population.

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/05/israeli-court-evict-1000-palestinians-west-bank-area

The cnuts are stealing more land.

Exactly what part of this don't you exactly understand?

PLO charter 1964:

Article 24. This Organization does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or the Himmah Area. Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields
 
Look at the last few posts here

Israel to evict 1000 Palestinian families.

3 Israelis stabbed.

It’s totally balanced and fair alright
Incorrect. 3 Israelis killed and 4 others wounded - and the thread wasn't bumped for this. In fact, the most recent post since the terrorist attack was to call Israelis cnuts.

Just for some context:

Brooklyn subway thread had 4 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/pos...k-in-brooklyn-subway-suspect-arrested.469840/

Reading stabbings thread had 3 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/reading-stabbings-3-dead-believed-to-be-a-terrorist-attack.455188/

It's totally balanced and fair alright.
 
Incorrect. 3 Israelis killed and 4 others wounded - and the thread wasn't bumped for this. In fact, the most recent post since the terrorist attack was to call Israelis cnuts.

Just for some context:

Brooklyn subway thread had 4 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/pos...k-in-brooklyn-subway-suspect-arrested.469840/

Reading stabbings thread had 3 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/reading-stabbings-3-dead-believed-to-be-a-terrorist-attack.455188/

It's totally balanced and fair alright.

More people post on here from the USA and U.K. than Isreal. Shock horror. I’m sure the football forums in Israel were going mad about Reading.The real fact of the matter is that it’s not surprising to most reasonable people that some Arab people will get mad or even go insane and try to fight back against apartheid.
 
More people post on here from the USA and U.K. than Isreal. Shock horror. I’m sure the football forums in Israel were going mad about Reading.The real fact of the matter is that it’s not surprising to most reasonable people that some Arab people will get mad or even go insane and try to fight back against apartheid.

So whats their excuse for all the wars and terror attacks on Jews before 1967?
 
When Robert Briscoe was doing his thing for Ireland, 800,000 Jews were evicted from their Arab homes for being Jewish.
It’s balanced alright.

You’re talking about the 1940s? If say for example you’re going all the way back to the 1940s and using it as a way to justify apartheid today then surely you can see what you’re doing to the Palestinians is just as unfair and illegal? How are things meant to progress into a modern solution when people are referencing the 1940s-60s as justification for current affairs
 
Incorrect. 3 Israelis killed and 4 others wounded - and the thread wasn't bumped for this. In fact, the most recent post since the terrorist attack was to call Israelis cnuts.

Just for some context:

Brooklyn subway thread had 4 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/pos...k-in-brooklyn-subway-suspect-arrested.469840/

Reading stabbings thread had 3 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/reading-stabbings-3-dead-believed-to-be-a-terrorist-attack.455188/

It's totally balanced and fair alright.

And what was stopping you bumping it or creating a thread for that exactly?
Unless you're having a go at yourself here it's an odd accusation to throw at others.
 
You’re talking about the 1940s? If say for example you’re going all the way back to the 1940s and using it as a way to justify apartheid today then surely you can see what you’re doing to the Palestinians is just as unfair and illegal? How are things meant to progress into a modern solution when people are referencing the 1940s-60s as justification for current affairs

Because events have consequences. Like genocidal wars against Israel (Jews) that have become rooted in today's Jihad, itself rooted in events going back centuries.
 
Because events have consequences. Like genocidal wars against Israel (Jews) that have become rooted in today's Jihad, itself rooted in events going back centuries.

Well if peace is ever going to be an option all of those things as horrible as they are and were will need to be set aside in the name of progress and human decency. It’s not fair to indefinitely imprison and persecute the descendants of a people because of something that happened generations ago. Things will never change if history keeps repeating
 
Well if peace is ever going to be an option all of those things as horrible as they are and were will need to be set aside in the name of progress and human decency. It’s not fair to indefinitely imprison and persecute the descendants of a people because of something that happened generations ago. Things will never change if history keeps repeating

Go and tell Hamas and Islamic Jihad that. Israel's secured peace with Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, UAE with more to come so it's not like we're allergic to making up. Meanwhile, the Palestinians have refused every single offer and turned to war every single time - even against their own and even the Jordanians. Are you noticing a theme here?

And history always repeats especially to those cursed with wishful thinking.
 
Because events have consequences. Like genocidal wars against Israel (Jews) that have become rooted in today's Jihad, itself rooted in events going back centuries.
You live in this weird delusional reality.

It’s also a massive insult to those Jews who did die in a Jewish genocide on European soil, perpetuated by Europeans.
 
Incorrect. 3 Israelis killed and 4 others wounded - and the thread wasn't bumped for this. In fact, the most recent post since the terrorist attack was to call Israelis cnuts.

Just for some context:

Brooklyn subway thread had 4 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/pos...k-in-brooklyn-subway-suspect-arrested.469840/

Reading stabbings thread had 3 pages:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/reading-stabbings-3-dead-believed-to-be-a-terrorist-attack.455188/

It's totally balanced and fair alright.

A big difference is that you won't see anyone here finding excuses for the guy who killed those israelis.

Fearless does it every other day whenever palestinians are killed.

Also, actions of one individual cannot be compared to calculated actions of a state.

There is nothing fair nor balanced about the whole thing.
 
A big difference is that you won't see anyone here finding excuses for the guy who killed those israelis.

Fearless does it every other day whenever palestinians are killed.

Also, actions of one individual cannot be compared to calculated actions of a state.

There is nothing fair nor balanced about the whole thing.

So you're OK with 'pay for slay' terror attacks?
 
A big difference is that you won't see anyone here finding excuses for the guy who killed those israelis.

Fearless does it every other day whenever palestinians are killed.

Also, actions of one individual cannot be compared to calculated actions of a state.

There is nothing fair nor balanced about the whole thing.

Someone already made an excuse above.
 
Ali Dia just a few posts above. Post 7,184.

I must have terrible comprehension skills then. I interpreted it as him saying horrible historical things in the past will have to be overlooked if we want peace now, in response to fearless bringing up events from centuries ago. Can you explain how you read it as justifying the recent murders?
 
I must have terrible comprehension skills then. I interpreted it as him saying horrible historical things in the past will have to be overlooked if we want peace now, in response to fearless bringing up events from centuries ago. Can you explain how you read it as justifying the recent murders?

Perhaps I interpreted the wrong way then. He was just saying that it's not surprising to most Arab people that some people will go mad or insane in response to apartheid. I thought this related to the recent axe murders in Israel. I got that wrong perhaps and it's not necessarily justification even if people can resonably justify it in response to the ever long apartheid/conflict/occupation.

Anyway since he was talking about Reading. I got it wrong.
 
Last edited:
956913_1894424_Aljazeerareporter_updates.jpg


Shireen Abu Akleh. Rest in peace.
 

RIP. So sad.

The Israelis have history though -


The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate said on Wednesday that Israel has killed more than 46 Palestinian journalists since the outbreak of the Al-Aqsa Intifada in 2000.

This came in a rally staged outside the UN headquarters in Gaza Strip on the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists.

Israel has a long history of targeting journalists. The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists have documented 17 confirmed instances of journalists killed in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory since 1992. Of these, 15 journalists have been killed by Israeli fire.


https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-killed-46-palestinian-journalists-since-2000/2032442