antihenry
CAF GRU Rep
Yet to see any official confirmation that it actually happened. The CNN report cites two unnamed US officials speaking on condition of anonymity. For all we know, that could have been Raoul and Sir Matt calling the station.
Yet to see any official confirmation that it actually happened. The CNN report cites two unnamed US officials speaking on condition of anonymity. For all we know, that could have been Raoul and Sir Matt calling the station.
Maybe they had a few too many missiles and their planes and ships needed target practice?
A few million more bombs and they might get as good as the Laos-trained Americans. Or maybe they will create an Iranian Khmer Rouge?
Or else it could be Russian incompetence at attempting to impress people by firing missiles from a ship. I'm willing to bet that's what happened, which of course will be covered up by the Russian propaganda machine to make Putin look less incompetent.
The whole 1991 Gulf War sure didn't stop George Bush from getting his ass kicked in the presidential election of the year after because he was just incompetent, that's a fact. Putin will pay for his own incompetence in one way or another.
They didn't get enough practice bombing their own people?
Yep, it was undoubtedly a farcical attempt at projecting that they are on par with the US in terms of launching remotely from ships. Still a ways to go Vlad.
Could have been worse I suppose, like hitting a hospital.
How imaginative.
Its just a bit rich to be clutching at one Russian stray cruise missile when you can make a drinking game out of number of times the US mentions 'collateral damage'.
The two are unrelated except in the alternate Universe in which you dwell.
Why are they unrelated? Presumably we're talking about missiles not reaching their intended target, unless you're insinuating that the Yanks were intending to blow up that hospital?
They're only relevant because both are in the news. Beyond that there are no similarities.
Unless by similar you wanted to be pedantic and link it to a specific example of the US landing one of its missiles in Iran, this would otherwise be an obvious comparison.
They're only relevant because both are in the news. Beyond that there are no similarities.
So no proof yet then? Anything? I'd imagine we'd have seen something by now.
Unless by similar you wanted to be pedantic and link it to a specific example of the US landing one of its missiles in Iran, this would otherwise be an obvious comparison.
So no proof yet then? Anything? I'd imagine we'd have seen something by now.
The Obama administration has ended the Pentagon’s $500 million program to train and equip Syrian rebels, administration
officials said on Friday, in an acknowledgment that the beleaguered effort had
failed to produce any kind of ground combat forces capable of taking on the Islamic State in Syria.
The Central Intelligence Agency runs a separate program to train and arm selected groups, many of which are now
battling Syrian army units backed by Russian air power.
The shift in strategy comes amid a huge deployment of force by Russia in support of Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, who has clung to power since the civil war began in 2011. Russian warplanes have conducted scores of airstrikes, and Moscow has
fired a barrage of cruise missiles at targets in
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/10/w...-program-islamic-state-syria.html?smid=tw-bna
http://arstechnica.com/information-...cruise-missiles-fell-short-of-syria-hit-iran/
An Azerbaijani news agency reported a crash of a "UFO" in the area of Iran between the Caspian and Iraq, which is probably within 50 miles of the border with Azerbaijan.
Hardly surprising now considering their investment either ends up in the hands of extremists, or gets blown to pieces by the Russians.
If the Yanks wants to help, then they should take up the Russian offer of sharing ISIS locations and coordinating air strikes. Or helping the militias in Iraq take back Ramadi as we speak.
Impossible. Opposite US/Russian Agendas.
I don't see where the option of sending troops in Iraq is opposite to US agenda. If the US want to keep that country in their own circle of influence, it's not too much asked to unleash hell from closer range after the Iraqis royally wasted their chance to build their own new society.
After their previous one was destroyed and almost irreversibly destabilised. Gotta admire the arrogance.
After their previous one was destroyed and almost irreversibly destabilised. Gotta admire the arrogance.
The gracious killing of thousands of people and bombing your country back into the Stone Age makes for an ideal start into building a new society. You only have yourselves to blame. Opportunity won't come knocking a third time.
You never know...opportunity won't come knocking a third time.
x1,000
And considering how many countries made full use of the rare opportunities they had to build something that lasts, those who don't better not blame others for their misfortunes.
You never know...
Bollocks. People in the middle east will happily accept and embrace 'democracy society'.If I dare to extend that metaphor, I can say that for a huge chunk of the Middle-East. If I'm wrong, then tell me why many of the countries in the region are not able to understand how a democratic society works.
What on earth are you on about?
Bollocks. People in the middle east will happily accept and embrace 'democracy society'.
x1,000
And considering how many countries made full use of the rare opportunities they had to build something that lasts, those who don't better not blame others for their misfortunes.
The gracious killing of thousands of people and bombing your country back into the Stone Age makes for an ideal start into building a new society. You only have yourselves to blame. Opportunity won't come knocking a third time.
I only wish more people in the Middle East could find some inspiration from Lebanon after their post-war rebuilding process though. It's a good example of what to do well after almost everything was lost in a war.
Drop the bullshit, will ya? If humans know how to organize themselves, they will build societies that will last. Unfortunately, the Iraqis look more like children who can't grow any sense of self-determination nor grow themselves into men with the maturity that goes with it. If I dare to extend that metaphor, I can say that for a huge chunk of the Middle-East. If I'm wrong, then tell me why many of the countries in the region are not able to understand how a democratic society works.
I watch the country with the biggest Muslim population, Indonesia, holding its ground well so far with an infant democracy, and I doubt the people over there would trade it for any of the crap they endured with the old dictatorial governments they had since their independence.
x1,000
And considering how many countries made full use of the rare opportunities they had to build something that lasts, those who don't better not blame others for their misfortunes.