I think we’d be mad not to sign him personally, we desperately need a creative winger
He’d be perfect for us and is already one of the top players in world football at 21
Not sure about him being able to play across 5 positions. His best performances have come playing from the left or as a No10 two positions we're stacked in he's never had an extended run on the RW and frankly his style of play isn't suited to the right. Sancho has proven himself equally on both wings, in the CL, 5 years younger and will be cheaper. Villa will want close to £100m for Grealish and he's nowhere near worth thatFrom what we heard last season, Ole wanted Sancho and Grealish.
Given our buys I assume we will only get one.
Now is everyone in agreement that you would rather have Sancho than Grealish?
I actually can’t quite believe that, Grealish is twice the player, more creative and an unbelievable ball carrier who can play across the from 5 positions.
Grealish and Kane and we win the league and Keane agrees with me!
From what we heard last season, Ole wanted Sancho and Grealish.
Given our buys I assume we will only get one.
Now is everyone in agreement that you would rather have Sancho than Grealish?
I actually can’t quite believe that, Grealish is twice the player, more creative and an unbelievable ball carrier who can play across the from 5 positions.
Grealish and Kane and we win the league and Keane agrees with me!
At least one thing we can agree on... Woodward and Judge will have nothing to do with any transfer activity... Thick gits who buy players our manager doesn’t want (VdB, Telles) because they perceive value. This isn’t investment banking, it’s football. Those two clowns should be nowhere near the negotiating table. Last summer’s saga over Sancho was unbearable.
Regarding price — €100m/£86m, I’d rather risk 86m on a young, productive winger than 80m on a 25 year old CB....
At least one thing we can agree on... Woodward and Judge will have nothing to do with any transfer activity... Thick gits who buy players our manager doesn’t want (VdB, Telles) because they perceive value. This isn’t investment banking, it’s football. Those two clowns should be nowhere near the negotiating table. Last summer’s saga over Sancho was unbearable.
Regarding price — €100m/£86m, I’d rather risk 86m on a young, productive winger than 80m on a 25 year old CB....
Grealish is twice the player of Sancho? Really? I thought i've read a lot of dross on the Caf but this one is probably right up there
‘Agree to disagree then. The stats back up the productivity as similar, with more assists coming when he lines up on the right. You’ve made this point before, there’s no sense in continuing to discuss, as clearly the fact is that he plays both RW and LW, and plays them both equally well, statistically. YOUR preference is that he plays LW, but you aren’t Ole, there was an offer last season for the player, it’s basically the same situation. The cited links actually list him playing RW more often than LW in both the 19/20 season and the 20/21 season. Source: transfermarkt
He might not be twice the player, but Gealish is performing in premier league. The jury is still out on Sancho if he will be able to do so. I don't believe Sancho will be able to recreate his bundesliga output in the premier league. Sancho might be the more obvious choice due to our lack of a rightsided attacker. Would love to see both at United though.Grealish is twice the player of Sancho? Really? I thought i've read a lot of dross on the Caf but this one is probably right up there
Read somewhere that Rashford could undergo shoulder surgery after Euros, that would surely mean him out for a few months at least? So potentially Sancho would start his career at United playing left winger most of the time.I’m firmly in the “Sancho is a no brainer” camp. I’d play hardball with Dortmund though. Sancho will primarily play on the right but he can also play left when rashford inevitably needs a rest. He can feed balls to cavani all day . We would have cavani, rashford, greenwood, Sancho, diallo, martial and James to choose from. Not too bad!
And why would that be the case? Isn't it a bit more probable that you want him to be RW because that would mean he fits into your team than me wanting him to be a LW just for the sake of it?
Transfermarkt is quite shit at those things. Sancho these days isn't just first choice as LW, Terzic even plays other players such as Reus or Hazard out of position to play Sancho there. If you really want to go into detail, Sancho is more of an AM in many of Dortmund's games because they played three at the back quite often under Favre and Terzic. And in this case, Sancho is playing as one of two AMs, usually left sided, and almost exclusively moves in the half spaces or between the lines with the wing backs providing width, not him.
It also should have you thinking that every world class player with Sancho's profile plays with his strong foot on the inside. I believe it's not debatable that he's a player who drifts towards the center of the pitch and sometimes even starts there. He even does it when he plays on the right. And having the ball on your inside foot when cutting inside opens up more possibilities because if it's the other way round, you're not only dribbling away from goal, you also have to shoot and play through balls with your weak foot. There hasn't been a single world class inverted winger who played with his strong foot on the outside at all. Maybe Sterling if we're being generous.
I think this is incredibly obvious if you watch Sancho play to be honest. He's so clearly preferring the left wing and his best scenes occur either there or in the half spaces.
Will Sancho perform better than Dan James? I think that's an overwhelming yes. If so, sign him.He might not be twice the player, but Gealish is performing in premier league. The jury is still out on Sancho if he will be able to do so. I don't believe Sancho will be able to recreate his bundesliga output in the premier league. Sancho might be the more obvious choice due to our lack of a rightsided attacker. Would love to see both at United though.
Thats not how it works. He has to worth the premium too.Will Sancho perform better than Dan James? I think that's an overwhelming yes. If so, sign him.
Good
I think the point being made here is that even when on paper he starts on the right, his contributions frequently come from the left. And that ignores the fact that these sites recording the starting position aren't necessarily accurate.That would be the case because you provide zero evidence to call it incredible obvious he’s just decent RW, and he’s more a LW. Why should we trust a non-trustworthy and questionable statement where there are two different sources proved you wrong.
I think the point being made here is that even when on paper he starts on the right, his contributions frequently come from the left. And that ignores the fact that these sites recording the starting position aren't necessarily accurate.
That being said I don't think there's a massive difference in where he's best, but if you actually watch Dortmund play he does tend to favour drifting in to the centre from the left, rather than stay on the right. I mean just watch the video posted above you to see that more often than not he's found on the left.
I think the takeaway isn't so much that he's a LW, but rather that to get the best out of him he shouldn't be given a strict role but be allowed to roam freely and interchange with the other attacking players.
Thats not how it works. He has to worth the premium too.
Yeah I agree, but the problem with that could be that United doesn't really have players who slot into that RW position while Sancho overloads the left side and combines in the centre. So I can already see people's disappointment in matches when it won't work well, and those matches will happen too. I think Dortmund generally have more flexible players in that regard, while United's players mostly prefer the left and Wan Bissaka isn't known for his attacking contributions.This is where people and one of them @Zehner don't understand that Sancho actually suitable with Ole's system. Ole plays a very fluid front four, similar to our 07/08 team but instead of front 3 it's front 4. Our front four tend to interchange position in the game which sometime you see James plays as striker while Cavani plays on the left wing. So Sancho won't necessary be sticking into RW the full 90 minutes with us and the fact Sancho does it in Dortmund is making him into a perfect signing as he has adapted the fluid & flexible style of the front four. On top of it, we need another playmaker to add creativity in the squad and Sancho is considered as playmaking winger.
Unpopular opinion - Raphinha is more the player we want RW.
I'd want Raphinha and a top CDM.
Sancho is much more proven tbf.
Raphina would be my second choice but he will still cost mad money.
If we sign him, can we play Rash at 9 and him on LW. Then, Mason and Amad rotate for RW.
Rashford can't play as a 9.If we sign him, can we play Rash at 9 and him on LW. Then, Mason and Amad rotate for RW.