GledTheRed
New Member
We need Diaby on these highlights.
Pretty sure they wont get a penny over this buyout clause tbf.Oh they'll eat humble pie when they get paid +100 for Haaland. Nice logic there.
I agree, I think Dortmund got fecked up by Covid. I think their plan was to sell this summer before the 50M clause kicked in but covid changed it, I don't think any team will be willing to pay 100M for him when they know he'll be available for 50M on summer 2022.Pretty sure they wont get a penny over this buyout clause tbf.
We need Diaby on these highlights.
Can we get him aswel as SanchoHe's a more natural on the right too, due to being left footed. Reminds me off Arjen Robben a little and is extremely fast. He recorded a sprint speed last year of 22.3 mph and he was only 20 at the time.
Having Diallo, Sancho, Diaby and Pellistri will enable us to field two teams in the premier league and we won't have to worry about not having a player on the RW.Can we get him aswel as Sancho
on a serious note he looks like the second coming of Mane but a lefty, we really should be looking at him
He's a more natural on the right too, due to being left footed. Reminds me off Arjen Robben a little and is extremely fast. He recorded a sprint speed last year of 22.3 mph and he was only 20 at the time.
Dortmund looking at 120million deficit this year. Their fans still seem confident they dont need to sell at all. Still has a very long contract.
I dunno, I cant see him moving this year.
That´s perfect time to sell. With Dortmund he´s going to win nowt. Whereas we are just coming back to full strength. Having him would seriously help and he knows it. Going back to England etc. I can see him go for little over around 60mil. pounds + some minor add ons. Otherwise he might sign a contract extension with bigger contract. Surely they don´t have that much money and are a selling club:-)2 and half years left on his current contract, so not that long.
Yeah I get that, I hate him as much as the next fella, however in this situation we have no choice.Like I have said before in posts it's going to come down to whether Ole can convince the board about having dealings with Raiola again, we are capable of rolling out the red carpet for him but whenever he is back on the market there is going to be a lot of serious competition
Yeh i agree. Imports from germany have been hit and miss. I think Haagland could be a risk as well. We dont need Sancho though, need a no9 for long term so rather take the put on haagland than sancho.Look at Havertz, Werner.
We dodged a bullet with this one. I'm a firm believer of class is permanent, but right now at this moment, I'm doubting the Bundesliga talents. Surely not worth 100m at this point.
That´s perfect time to sell. With Dortmund he´s going to win nowt. Whereas we are just coming back to full strength. Having him would seriously help and he knows it. Going back to England etc. I can see him go for little over around 60mil. pounds + some minor add ons. Otherwise he might sign a contract extension with bigger contract. Surely they don´t have that much money and are a selling club:-)
Exactly. There's a reason Kagawa, Mkhitaryan, et al. never turned it on in the Prem. I do think Havertz and Werner will end up figuring out how to play in the Prem, just maybe not setting the place exactly ablaze.Look at Havertz, Werner.
We dodged a bullet with this one. I'm a firm believer of class is permanent, but right now at this moment, I'm doubting the Bundesliga talents. Surely not worth 100m at this point.
Weird. Whoscored says he completed 10 dribbles which is a crazy amount.
I only watched about 20 mins of each half but most of it looked like sideways dribbling, there was one good dribble in the box but that was it.
I agree. Not for 100m. Plus to prove how fickle fans are, Grealish was superb last season too. We had the chance to sign him, yet our fans looked down at him because Villa were fighting relegation. Now he costs 100mYeah people suddenly being off him shows just how fickle football fans are. He'd be a world class addition and make an unbelievable difference to our attack.
If we could somehow sign Sancho and Grealish, we would have all the ingredients to become a very special United team.Yeah people suddenly being off him shows just how fickle football fans are. He'd be a world class addition and make an unbelievable difference to our attack.
Yeah people suddenly being off him shows just how fickle football fans are. He'd be a world class addition and make an unbelievable difference to our attack.
He was regarded as one of the best U20 wingers on the planet before he moved to Leverkusen, I've been hearing good things about him since his move, one to keep your eye on.@Zehner, is Moussa Diaby as good as the highlights vs. Dortmund suggests?! He absolutely terrorised their defence (based on the 5 minute clip)!
He would make us better no doubt but I say we spend that money on Mbappe instead, he's running his contract down. Perhaps unrealistic
Interesting, cheers @AltiUn. Just read that he joined from PSG. France is like a fecking wheelhouse of talent at the moment.He was regarded as one of the best U20 wingers on the planet before he moved to Leverkusen, I've been hearing good things about him since his move, one to keep your eye on.
He's got 5 assists2 goals and 0 assists in 15 Bundesliga games.
If we can get him for 50 mill then fine but i'd rather see us go all out for Haaland, Mbappe, a central defender or one of the Leverkussen talents.
@Zehner, is Moussa Diaby as good as the highlights vs. Dortmund suggests?! He absolutely terrorised their defence (based on the 5 minute clip)!
Sancho was the best BVB player on the pitch against us. Subbing him off was a very weird decision, my Dortmund supporting mate was fuming because of it. It also killed the game, IMO. Dortmund looked the more dangerous team up until the sub and toothless after it.
He's definitely special. Haaland has more lime light currently but I'd still go for Sancho in a heartbeat. Much higher ceiling.
Also, he's still at 17 scorers in 22 games this season, despite Dortmund being very inconsistent. Tells a lot if that is labelled a crises.
He was the best player for Dortmund, but the match showed flaws in his game for a supposed £100m+ player. He won't help you beat a low block. He's reluctant to take a man on 1v1 in the final third or run in behind regularly.
Don't get me wrong he's technique is brilliant and the ball sticks to him, but he's not in the same calibre as the likes of Neymar, Mbappe who can beat players with pace. Even someone like Hazard (at Chelsea) was a level or two above Sancho.
I'd take him but not at the prices Dortmund want, because he could very well struggle against the more compact defences United face. We saw it with Kagawa and Mikhi who were less talented but struggled a lot at United.
Also he has 6 goals in 22 games this season.
Honestly, I think Sancho is more talemted than Mbappe who can be really sloppy on the ball.
Also, we didn't play a low block and in the situations in which Dortmund had us pushed into our own box, Sancho was very dangerous with his dribblongs and through balls. He's also quite fast,not slower than Hazard. I think the only valid point you make is that he doesn't make deep runs as often but that's also true for Neymar and Messi.
Talentwise he's IMO in the Hazard tier, not Neymar or even Messi.
And by the way, I think Kagawa and Mkhitaryan struggled sue to completely different reasons. Both were used to low blocks at Dorfmund. This had more to do with being used to a system totally different from what United was playing.
Hmm perhaps, you're probably right on Kagawa and Mikhi I didn't watch them much at Dortmund.
R.e. Sancho I watched him a lot when he first broke through at Dortmund, I do rate him highly. But he's not close to Hazard in my opinion, who carried Chelsea for years and was their main focal point consistently drawing fouls and creating. The closest comparison I can think of is someone like Grealish, who consistently creates and dribbles for Villa. Sancho has it in him to do that, but he doesn't, whether that's coaching or a lack of confidence I'm not sure, but it's something I've seen when he's played in Europe too.
It's just for £100m+ you'd want someone who's already a complete article, not one that still has a lot of growing to do.
Lets be realistic. Glazers are not going to sanction another right winger after we signed 2 already for a total of £50mil. Not unless Dortmund were suddenly desperate for money and we low balled them a misery offer.
Ole from press reports really wants Haaland more than the club want Sancho. However finances are tight in football at the moment. We know Haaland is available for £75mil in summer of 2022. We have Cavani for another season. Personally I think Ole will look to strengthen with a new CB this summer and a backup RB if possible. Then wait till the summer of 2022 to see if we can land Haaland. If we cant and Diallo and Pellestri arent making the progress the club think they should be making, then i think Utd might switch to Sancho. BUT i dont see dortmund allowing Sancho and Haaland to leave in same window. Thats why i think Sancho to Utd is dead in the water. Imho.
This is what i've been saying for a while and him being naturally right footed makes him a ideal candidate for the role on the left. One of our youth coaches in England, Dan Micciche who has worked with Sancho at junior national level believes he's best suited to playing on the left. Also it's important to remember that his dip in form possibly coincided with Hakimi leaving which has possibly impacted his performance.I agree in general. He'd definitely improve United by a lot and I think he'd work great with Bruno, Rashford, Martial, Greenwood and the likes. However, I'm also pretty sure he'll end up on the left wing rather sooner than later. His profile is typical for an inverted winger and atypical for a traditional one and his best plays already occur when he's occupying the left wing or the half spaces. Ao yes, he'd improve United but he wouldn't fill the vacant spot on RW