Is Cristiano Ronaldo a United legend? | Poll added

Is Cristiano Ronaldo a Man Utd legend?


  • Total voters
    2,525
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't be both? I'm truly gobsmacked by how many posters don't think he's a United legend. He's won everything with you and became the best player in the world aswell. I don't know what you'd have to do to become a legend if he isn't one. United had one of their best spells when he started to become the player he is today. I think people have forgotten how good he actually was because he didn't score the insane amount of goals he does now.
ive said this before, he wasn't the goal machine he is now for us but he was a more exciting player to watch
 
Nah, he'd have played second fiddle to Messi at Barca, and would've struggled to fit into their system. Likewise playing second fiddle to Ronaldo at Real Madrid. I'm not particularly sure he'd offer Bayern anything that their strikers didn't in that period.

He's been at his level here. He's hardly been a one-man team pulling us up from mediocrity. Between 2011-2015, he's had one season in which he was our best player.
You mean the main man? that i'd agree with. Thought you meant he wouldn't be one of the key players in those sides.

Fact is he could've left but he didn't. He was here when everything was rosy and we played wonderful football and hes been here during the bad times too when this went south.
 
Inspired by K2K's thread for Rooney.

I always find it weird that Ronaldo is seen as a United legend by so many (or maybe I'm overestimating how many do see him as one?)

For me a club legend cannot have bigger ties to a club of similar stature.
Fair enough if a player goes on to have big success at a bigger club (Sir Alex can be a St Mirren, Aberdeen Legend, for example) or even if they join a smaller club after having their success somewhere else.

But in Ronaldo's case, he's done almost all of his best work at a club of similar stature. Some United fans have almost deluded themselves that the footballing world thinks of United when they hear Ronaldo's name (we had some fans asking Ronaldo to 'score for us' when Madrid played Liverpool in Europe last season.)

I swear Ronaldo would be the first club legend who went to a club of similar stature, became synonymous with that club, did his best stuff there and still remained a legend at club 1.

Do you agree or not?
Or is it totally different because Madrid aren't in the same league?

Yes he is a legend at both clubs. The only comparable example I can think of is Puskas at Honved and Real Madrid, and yes no doubt he is a legend at both too.
 
Three great seasons doesn't suit the criteria I have for a legend of a particular club. Yes I include Ronaldinho from my own club in that too. For a player to be regarded as a legend, I believe longevity at that club has to accompany great performances. Remember the guy was desperate to leave United for Madrid twice before he eventfully did leave and is probably synonymous with them more so than at United.
 
He left in a bad way, if he left at 28/29 to go and do other things, no one would even question it. Think about it, I dont know how Arsenal fans would look back to Henry if he left then before be hit his speak to go to Barcelona.

The guy kicked up a fuss to leave us. We had to beg him 3 summers in a row to stay with us - funny enough those 3 following seasons were his best years. That left a bad taste in my mouth and I cant call him a legend because of it. People don't remember now, but he didn't celebrate goals etc for the majority of the 08/09 season.
 
Anyone with a basic knowledge of the Club's history would include Ronnie in their 'All Time United Eleven' on his 2008 performances alone. So yeah! United Legend without a doubt!
The fact 'Viva Ronaldo' is still sung with such pride by those that really matter (Match going Reds) speaks volumes in my humble opinion.
 
My understanding is that he was professional about leaving in that Ferguson asked him for one more season and he agreed, and they both stuck to the agreement.
 
I dont know if he or rooney are legends, its not exactly a specific. easily identifiable characteristic.

Both are a pretty big part of our history and should be remembered in the same manner that best, law and edwards are though.
(and irwin and robson and cantona and ...)
 
Three great seasons doesn't suit the criteria I have for a legend of a particular club. Yes I include Ronaldinho from my own club in that too. For a player to be regarded as a legend, I believe longevity at that club has to accompany great performances. Remember the guy was desperate to leave United for Madrid twice before he eventfully did leave and is probably synonymous with them more so than at United.

This.

He was a great player but wasn't here long enough. Also since leaving us, the way he talks seems like United was just a stepping stone for him and not a club that he adores or has a great connection with. After retiring, I don't see him having any links with us.
 
Yes I think that is entirely valid, in retrospect he did spend most of his time here gearing towards the unbelievable player we see at Madrid now so that has to tint our view seeing him hit those records every year and to be honest I, like most of you I imagine, have a little bit of almost parental pride seeing him go on to hit the numbers that he has after being brought through at our club but he still was legendary for us both in terms of what he helped us achieve and just what he meant for those years to our team and the effect it had on our rivals and their fans.
See, I can understand this... when the player has made a clear step up, a natural progression.
For example, I remember looking through some Crystal Palace forums after they won promotion and Zaha-United had been conformed.

Many of them said something along the lines of 'He's a legend, and he's won us promotion. He'll be a world beater there. But he'll always be Palace at heart, and we can take pride when he's doing it at the top level'

I can just about understand them feeling parental pride and calling him a legend. I can understand them feeling indirect pride if/when he has a stellar career after leaving their club.

But United fans for Ronaldo? Where's the clear step up when he joined Madrid? Where was his desire to make United the main chapter of his career*? He wasn't forced to chase his ambitions elsewhere. I can't understand using his Madrid achievements as further support to calling him a legend.

*Club 2 being the main chapter isn't an issue in itself, however the clear desire to make club 2 the main chapter (leaving as soon as entering peak - to a club who aren't of bigger stature) is the issue.
As is playing, by far, the best football almost solely at club 2.
 
Three seasons yes but what he achieved in three seasons would have taken Rooney seven or eight to tie. So if Rooney is a United legend, sure as hell Ronaldo is one as well.
 
When your name is still being sung by the supporters in the stands, years after leaving United, you're pretty much a United legend
 
Yes for me he is a legend. I remember being a 13 year old idiot who turned the Fulham away game off and sat on the stairs sad as I didn't think we could win it at 1-1 and thought Chelsea were gonna get the third title in a row. But no Ronaldo did an amazing run and scored. He will always be a legend for that
 
Of course he is.. Was the best player in the world when he played for us!
 
Bigger legends include:

Giggs,
Rooney,
Neville,
Scholes,
Charlton,
Best,
Law,
Smikes,
Ferguson,
Keane,
Robson,
Irwin,
Busby,
Ferdinand
Neville over Ronaldo...hmm. Neville was a solid decent RB (easily replaced) while Ronaldo was a match winner (at often decisive moments like Fulham away)
 
Three great seasons doesn't suit the criteria I have for a legend of a particular club. Yes I include Ronaldinho from my own club in that too. For a player to be regarded as a legend, I believe longevity at that club has to accompany great performances. Remember the guy was desperate to leave United for Madrid twice before he eventfully did leave and is probably synonymous with them more so than at United.

Then why do we still sing a song to his name? He left 6 years ago.
 
You can't be both? I'm truly gobsmacked by how many posters don't think he's a United legend. He's won everything with you and became the best player in the world aswell. I don't know what you'd have to do to become a legend if he isn't one. United had one of their best spells when he started to become the player he is today. I think people have forgotten how good he actually was because he didn't score the insane amount of goals he does now.
He led us to the title in 2007. Many people thought Chelsea were gonna steam roll us that year with Shevchenko and Ballack but Ronaldo fecked them all. Ronaldo is a fecking huge legend for me....god it's such a shame he left :(
 
I'm greatly surprised at the number of people who don't consider him a United legend, I thought this would be unanimous. His 3 seasons from 06-09 were probably the greatest by a player in a United shirt and he managed to win the ballon d'Or once, win the league three straight times, got to 1 semi, 2 finals in Europe, while winning one. That in itself should clear any doubts of his status with the club.

If you need any extra incentive, Neville thought he owed Ronaldo his PL medal for the 2007-08 season in his autobiography, Ferguson has a chapter in his own book dedicated to him and he was one of the few people requested to speak at Ferguson's retirement despite him being at a different club. The supporters still love him and sing his name at games (they even sing Forlan's name but its not the same).

You don't necessarily have to stay at the club for your life to be considered a club legend.
Of course not. But you can give the benefit of the doubt to players who make a move to bigger clubs. They left because their ambitions couldn't be matched at club 1. They may well have stayed had they been able to achieve things at club 1.

Ronaldo could have achieved it all at United. But he decided he wanted Madrid to be the main part of his career, and that their records were better to break than United's. It's a two way thing, for me. The desire has to be there from the player.

Had Ronaldo given two/three more peak seasons to United? I'd see a guy who had a desire to give his best football to two sets of fans (which was possible), I'd be calling him a legend.
 
Three great seasons doesn't suit the criteria I have for a legend of a particular club. Yes I include Ronaldinho from my own club in that too. For a player to be regarded as a legend, I believe longevity at that club has to accompany great performances. Remember the guy was desperate to leave United for Madrid twice before he eventfully did leave and is probably synonymous with them more so than at United.
At a time where it seemed Chelsea were gonna dominate the english league...yeah Ronaldo deserves respect for pulling us above them. At the time I thought the club I supported was fecked and Ronaldo changed all of that....He's a big hero for me despite his desire to go to Madrid.

Edit - Also his 2006/2007 performance is the best I've seen in my time supporting United.
 
At a time where it seemed Chelsea were gonna dominate the english league...yeah Ronaldo deserves respect for pulling us above them. At the time I thought the club I supported was fecked and Ronaldo changed all of that....He's a big hero for me despite his desire to go to Madrid.
That's fair enough. After all, the term legend is very subjective. No doubt Ronaldo played a big part in United winning the title back, how big of a role did Rooney play in that too? It'd be interesting to see a comparison of Rooney's season in 2006-07 in comparison to Ronaldo.
 
How is he a legend? He was a brilliant player for us but he left aged only 24 to play for Madrid. He's a legend there.
Because he won us titles? Because he was the main catalyst for those titles? WTF

Without him...well I can't imagine us having a good time
 
That's fair enough. After all, the term legend is very subjective. No doubt Ronaldo played a big part in United winning the title back, how big of a role did Rooney play in that too? It'd be interesting to see a comparison of Rooney's season in 2006-07 in comparison to Ronaldo.
The first title I saw was 06-07 so I have a huge respect to Ronaldo for delivering that

If my memory is correct I think Ronaldo was the main player while Rooney was the background guy in those years

Edit - Despite how many years Rooney has played for United I still have Ronaldo above him. Rooney has been a cnutish figure which I have wished we would have gotten rid of by now. Absolute leach
 
Nah, no player who fecks off and goes on to become a better player somewhere else is a United legend. Arguably our best player since Best, but not a legend. You have to have some affinity with the club, which is why I think a lot of people struggle with calling Rooney a legend where as someone else Evra, Neville, Solskjaer or Cantona are far easier despite being inferior players.
 
Is the best if not second best player to ever play for us but he's not a club legend?

6 years later and in our next match we still hear his name being sung.

For me a legend is someone who defines an era the kind of player we will be talking about for the next 100 years. Gary Neville? Really. Ronaldo will be the one we tell our kids about.
 
Of course not. But you can give the benefit of the doubt to players who make a move to bigger clubs. They left because their ambitions couldn't be matched at club 1. They may well have stayed had they been able to achieve things at club 1.

Ronaldo could have achieved it all at United. But he decided he wanted Madrid to be the main part of his career, and that their records were better to break than United's. It's a two way thing, for me. The desire has to be there from the player.

Had Ronaldo given two/three more peak seasons to United? I'd see a guy who had a desire to give his best football to two sets of fans (which was possible), I'd be calling him a legend.

His argument was that he won every club and individual honor there is to be won at United, which is true. Lifting Real out of their misery at that time was probably a bigger challenge for him, which you cannot argue against and he gave them the league, 10th European cup and won the ballon d'or once again. I think he's a legend at both clubs.
 
I'd say he is probably the best player we ever had, and we've enjoyed great success during his time with us, when he was also the best player in the world. The way he talked us up with respect every time does help to reinforce his legendary status. But thing is he is bigger legend for Real Madrid than for us, his best/peak years are with Real.

But for me he is still a legend. Definitely among the top 10.
 
It's a bit of a silly word, to be honest.

Ronaldo is one of the club's greatest ever players, contributing heavily to the kind of success a top club will only see once every generation, if that (unless you're lucky enough to support Barcelona).

He was the best player in the world while here, scored over 100 goals and inspired joy excitement amongst supporters that few footballers will ever manage.

Whatever it is you want to call it, it's quite special.

Good post. If you don't consider Ronaldo to be a club legend you're going to be waiting a long time for another one to come along.
 
I couldn't disagree any more strongly with this.

The same Rooney that repeatedly asked to leave? That criticised Sir Alex in his last months at the club.

Ronaldo left us, yes. And he may have even had a greater career elsewhere. But he left us after handing us the European Cup, and taking us to another European Cup Final after being crowned the World Best Player.

Cantona and Ronaldo are both legends who left us wanting more. Giggs and Scholes are legends who continued producing long after anyone else would have stopped.

Rooney? He got fat and he got slow, he never fulfilled his promise. Maybe he will go down as a Scholes or a Giggs, Maybe he should have left us long ago.
Rooney asked to leave, but at the end he stayed and has been for a 11 years and gave us his best years. Ronaldo played his best football at Real Madrid.

Either way, I don't personally put as much as emphasis on trophies, goals and assists into this as you are. For me, Gary Neville is a bigger legend than Rooney or Ronaldo and I don't personally think they are, for me. Especially not Ronaldo. Not for this club, at least.
 
For me, not a 'legend', though one of the best to have played here. Can't really call anyone who leaves a club before their peak a legend., and (imho) when most people think of Ronny, they think of Madrid.
 
If he had stayed a few extra seasons maybe. I know he would have smashed that goals record anyways,

Legend, probably not. He did give his peak years to Real Madrid and basically sacked us off so...

There was also a few games, in his last season, where he quite clearly wasn't arsed
 
Usually i'd say longevity would be among the criteria I would have for club legends but I think Ronaldo deserves to be an exception. It is arguable that his best years were with Madrid but even when he was at United he was the best player in the world at one point in time, you cant say that about any of our other legends from the 90s until now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.