Hear hear. Well said Kentonio!!!
Iran v US confrontation
- Thread starter 4bars
- Start date
Hear hear. Well said Kentonio!!!
@Kentonio
There is always solutions. Bomb a militar base, nos civilians. 1 in a populated area, one not, etc...Sure they had more than 2
And it the end it looks like that. Apparently US is the only one that have the right to have nukes to save on lifes in an invasion for their interests, but other countries can't have them of their interests, basically because US interests are the "good" interests and the others interests are the "bad" interests. That is how it works, right?
Anyway, @Van Gaalacticos, the situation is simply retarded. If your goal is avoid Iran to have nukes, pulling out of the JPOA is the worst case scenario because it was preventing precisely that, all experts said so.
There is always solutions. Bomb a militar base, nos civilians. 1 in a populated area, one not, etc...Sure they had more than 2
And it the end it looks like that. Apparently US is the only one that have the right to have nukes to save on lifes in an invasion for their interests, but other countries can't have them of their interests, basically because US interests are the "good" interests and the others interests are the "bad" interests. That is how it works, right?
Anyway, @Van Gaalacticos, the situation is simply retarded. If your goal is avoid Iran to have nukes, pulling out of the JPOA is the worst case scenario because it was preventing precisely that, all experts said so.
Russia has more.
Depends on the information Trump has that's contrary to the information the so called experts have. If the deal that was in place exacerbated the situation then Trump was correct in my opinion.
Replace Trump with Bush and Iran with Iraq in every single comment of yours.
You're giving Trump way too much credit.
Except for the experts who said Iraq had WMD's then you are correct, seems the other way around this time
You're not giving him enough, what specifically has he done that makes him untrustworthy here?
He is extremely stupid, for one.
? Like when he...?
Have you been living under a rock?
So, is your belief that the experts are by defintion wrong?
That is interesting. Is the sky blue? Many experts believe it is, and they also believed Saddam had WMDs!
No you're going to have to give a few examples
Are you serious? There are too many to list. How about when he had to get his intelligence briefings to have pictures in them because he was bad at reading?
Really insightful response. Unoriginal anti-Trump bollox.
What? Depends who is defining these people as unbiased experts doesn't' it.
??? Is that the best you could come up with? He seems to have been good enough at reading to release a successful book.
Well said!!...if you're for real lol
I wonder if when you woke up today you thought you would be defending the intelligence of Donald TrumpDo you know what a ghostwriter is?
Not even someone as one-eyed as you could seriously believe that.
So, the IAEA in 2003 did not find any evidence of Saddam's WMDs. The only evidence was from the CIA, and MI6 and Mossad agreed with them, that Saddam had WMDs.
Today, the IAEA and Europeans agencies including MI6 do not think there are Iranian nukes, while the CIA and Mossad thinks there are.
In the valley of the blind.....
Yes, just a point to easily counter yours. So again I'll ask, what has Trump specifically done that makes him so untrustworthy?
You didn't counter it at all. Why dont you come out and tell us what you really believe instead of playing contrarian, you arent capable of it.
Because nothing changes...ever!
How well do you know these sources personally? Why are you so sure to trust them with all information they provide? Why are lsrael to be distrusted so much?
What do you even mean by that?
Tell us what your opinion of trump is.
So nothing specific then?
I'm distrusting both Mossad and the CIA, who were wrong on an identical issue last time. I'm distrusting them because they both have vested interests/long-term strategic goals wrt regime change in Iran. I'm distrusting them because agencies without that vested interest contradict them, just like last time.
The same experts that Trump have that make him pull out of the Paris agreement because the Global Warming is an hoax?
Soon he will pull out NASA funding because his experts will tell him that the earth is flat
Trump's experts don't know more than the JPOA experts (US included). Trump "experts" only care about themselves
The two agencies you listed don't have any vested interests in Iran that is independent of the government's they serve.
Yes.
Felt like it was already out there and obvious tbh. I like him and think he does his best for the American people who he information he has even if it ruffles political feathers elsewhere. On the other hand I don't want this discussion to become too heated as I don't wanna get banned or anything haha, I just want an open discussion looking at all he options.
Why do you like him? Which policies do you support?
If anyone thinks Trumps intentions are pure and for the sake of humanity
Fine lol. List them on here instead of some random reddit thread that essentially has nothing to say. I'd say you have nothing to come back at me with
That's a fair point.