Red Dreams
Full Member
Right, an agreement to prevent a country who has sworn to annihilate a country off the face of the Earth from building nukes.
What do you not understand by "an agreement" ?
Right, an agreement to prevent a country who has sworn to annihilate a country off the face of the Earth from building nukes.
Did they really swear to annihilate a country off the face of the earth?
What do you not understand by "an agreement" ?
Ignore that post. I've been mixing up threads todayhttps://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/03/Iranian-View-of-Israel/387085/
Sometimes, it's too easy to defeat pseudo-intellectuals in an argument.
You leave yourself open to counter with such a naive question. Search the term Hezbollah and you will find that Iran has actually been involved in more conflicts than the US in the Middle East over the last several decades.
Ignore that post. I've been mixing up threads today
Edit : just had a quick read back through the thread, of all the quotes (translated) you posted only Khamenei has any authority and his quotes don't say anything about wiping Israel off the earth.
Ignore that post. I've been mixing up threads today
Edit : just had a quick read back through the thread, of all the quotes (translated) you posted only Khamenei has any authority and his quotes don't say anything about wiping Israel off the earth.
I think Israel's official US embassy replied to that with an image + "why are you so obsessed with me" caption. It's childish stuff.
I mean...you'd expect all sides to be approaching it with some sort of officialness-feeling to it, or very diplomatic/rational. But when embassies are using memes and official leaders are beefing on Twitter...feels all very un-official.Yup it's the first tweet that shows up, weird response.
They’ve been saying that for at least 20 years and probably more if my memory could stretch accurately to such detail.Did they really swear to annihilate a country off the face of the earth?
You're on some point which is irrelevant. Think I've been clear that the Trump administration is causing the current turmoil but that this doesn't absolve Iran on every point. They still are a threat in the region, if not by their own arms then by proxy. Hence it's understandable for Dems to see Iranians as a threat yet oppose any direct military action against them.
I feel like we re getting more "un-official" every day - which makes the nostalgic Trump voters even more laughable. Public discourse has gone to shit with every day that man is in the WH.I mean...you'd expect all sides to be approaching it with some sort of officialness-feeling to it, or very diplomatic/rational. But when embassies are using memes and official leaders are beefing on Twitter...feels all very un-official.
They’ve been saying that for at least 20 years and probably more if my memory could stretch accurately to such detail.
I feel like we re getting more "un-official" every day - which makes the nostalgic Trump voters even more laughable. Public discourse has gone to shit with every day that man is in the WH.
an agreement is not irrelevant. Or clearly you do not understand what that means.
Address that first.
Secondly. The main threats in the middle east are Saudi Arabia and the current Israeli regime.
What do you want me to say, that the Trump administration reneged on the nuclear deal? Ya they did, no one is debating this point, hence why it is irrelevant. Clearly that has led to the current turmoil. If the US attacks Iran, it will be Trump's fault.
The second point is your opinion. I would agree that Netanyahu and the Ayatollah are equally dangerous to peace, think that Saudi Arabia would be too scared to act without US backing though.
The chicken hawk politicians love sending other people’s kids to their slaughter in quagmires like Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria. Iran will be no different only much bigger.
I’m sure there will be a new Haliburton ready to cash in on the destruction of another country and the military industrial complex will just chug along.
Not defending the US here they have been responsible for a lot of the mess in the ME, but Iran have been sending their proxies in most of these conflicts too it's not just Hezbollah.True! coudl you tell me the capital of Hezbollah?
Lets talk about Capitalism an US bullying the entire region. Capital of capitalism?
Is difficult to be involved in more countries than US when they had been involved in every single war in the area direct or indirect. And is at thousands of km from US
Is very cheap to accuse Iran to be a thread for the peace and to destabilize the area when US had been doing that to Iran since the Sha. And don't compare what the US did to the area with th GUlf wars, Syria, Egypt even lately with Turkey and the lira, Yemen, sourcing Saudi Arabia and Israel, Afghanistan with all the lies and etc... with whatever terrorist acts that Hezbollah caused. Simply not comparable
I just realized... if we did go to war with Iran, we’d be doing it without even an actual secretary of defense.
Not defending the US here they have been responsible for a lot of the mess in the ME, but Iran have been sending their proxies in most of these conflicts too it's not just Hezbollah.
You're preaching to the converted mate.Most of the countries of US in the middle East are proxies or viceversa in the middle east. We are talking about countries, and rich ones. Not organization as Hezbollah
US organized a coup to put the Shah in Iran
US lied to invade Afghanistan
US lied to invade Iraq
US armed the "rebels" in Syria
US broke a international treaty signed by the biggest powers in the world with Iran.
US is supporting Saudi Arabia on the unjust war against Yemen with catastrophic results
And that without putting Israel support into the mix
Comparing that to Hezbollah and Iran proxys is LAUGH-A-BLE. IN any single of the events
And Afghanistan.You're preaching to the converted mate.
But you fail to acknowledge Iran have been meddling in the Syria, Iraq and Yemen civil wars too.
You're preaching to the converted mate.
But you fail to acknowledge Iran have been meddling in the Syria, Iraq and Yemen civil wars too.
You're preaching to the converted mate.
But you fail to acknowledge Iran have been meddling in the Syria, Iraq and Yemen civil wars too.
Completely missing the point like others, every state has their own interests in the region, but let's not pretend Iran has never taken part in any nefarious activities either.Which countries don't meddle in there own neighborhood ? Saudis, qatar, turks, israel all are meddling in the middle east but somehow if iran does it they are the big bad monsters!
Every country that wants to dominate meddles in other countries. There aren't many neutral countries like Switzerland!
Nice whataboutery. Doesn't make any side innocentIran is surrounded by enemies. They have a right to meddle when Saudi Arabia openly fund islamists all over the shop. Turkey has openly backed terrorist forces that are killing the Kurds, who are backed by the west. Then look at Libya where all sorts of Gulf air forces are bombing groups on the ground. Sudan and Somalia too.
Obviously Iran funds and arms organisations who are opposed to the others funded by their enemies. They’ve done a decent job of keeping their borders relatively safe - only Balochistan in the south is giving them actual trouble.
Double checking the passport they found floating in the sea was actually Iranian.It is being reported that Trump seemingly gave the order to bomb and then pulled back at the last second.
Iran is directly responsible for deaths of half a million syrians civilians by propping Assad.Iran is surrounded by enemies. They have a right to meddle when Saudi Arabia openly fund islamists all over the shop. Turkey has openly backed terrorist forces that are killing the Kurds, who are backed by the west. Then look at Libya where all sorts of Gulf air forces are bombing groups on the ground. Sudan and Somalia too.
Obviously Iran funds and arms organisations who are opposed to the others funded by their enemies. They’ve done a decent job of keeping their borders relatively safe - only Balochistan in the south is giving them actual trouble.
Iran is directly responsible for deaths of half a million syrians civilians by propping Assad.
This size. Only this one I got my son for xmas doesn't work. Think it needs a bigger runway.Is it just me or do any other of you think of drones about the size of a pizza?
Nice pavers.This size. Only this one I got my son for xmas doesn't work. Think it needs a bigger runway.
lobal Hawks are massive surveillance platforms, in operation since 2001, with a wingspan of more than 130 feet and a maximum takeoff weight of more than 16 tons, equivalent to roughly seven shipping containers of cocaine. They have a range of more than 12,000 nautical miles, can fly at strikingly high altitudes of 60,000 feet, and can stay aloft for 34 hours straight. They have no offensive capabilities; their value lies in their ability to combine range, vantage point, and persistence with powerful surveillance sensors to monitor ground or maritime activity in great detail. According to analysis by the Government Accountability Office, Global Hawks have at times cost the US more than $220 million to manufacture and equip.
So your response to Iranians destroying Syria is to claim a whataboutery.If you want to play that game then what do you think the count of other countries is?
Iran is directly responsible for deaths of half a million syrians civilians by propping Assad.