zing
Zingle balls
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 14,304
We don't have a middle order. Apart from Yuvraj.
How do you constantly get everything wrong about cricket?
We don't have a middle order. Apart from Yuvraj.
Hats off to Yuvraj, I was one of those who said he should be dropped.
Dhoni said it right that when Yuvi gets in form he has a single minded determination win matches and tournaments for India.
Siddhu is such a fecking muppet
cant watch the post match analysis because of that idiot
Harsha Bhogle not taking the praise Simon Hughes was giving Gary Kirsten well...despite Raina thanking Gary right at the top of his interview
You know how everyone says, they hate England(football) because of the stupid fans, hype etc etc. even though in reality it's the stupid media? Well India are exactly the same. Smug as hell pundits...
To the match...India way too good for Australia in the end, 5 wicket victory with more than 2 overs to spare is pretty comprehensive.
I'd say India were favourites in the SF against Pakistan, obviously Pakistan has a better bowling lineup than Australia, and their spinners will be approximately 1000 times better, but I don't think their batting will handle the pressure(especially if they have to chase).
Harsha Bhogle not taking the praise Simon Hughes was giving Gary Kirsten well...despite Raina thanking Gary right at the top of his interview
I disagreed with Simon Hughes too, because Simon Hughes was crediting the SA backroom staff with bringing the mental toughness to the Indian team. If he'd said they'd brought professionalism to the Indian unit, I'd have agreed 100%. But crediting the saffers for our ability to handle pressure? That's a bit ironic, isn't it?
Harsha Bhogle not taking the praise Simon Hughes was giving Gary Kirsten well...despite Raina thanking Gary right at the top of his interview
You know how everyone says, they hate England(football) because of the stupid fans, hype etc etc. even though in reality it's the stupid media? Well India are exactly the same. Smug as hell pundits...
To the match...India way too good for Australia in the end, 5 wicket victory with more than 2 overs to spare is pretty comprehensive.
I'd say India were favourites in the SF against Pakistan, obviously Pakistan has a better bowling lineup than Australia, and their spinners will be approximately 1000 times better, but I don't think their batting will handle the pressure(especially if they have to chase).
That's actually quite rubbish, only Sidhu is the one who is a cnut. The rest of them are quite good(Gavaskar, Shastri, Ganguly, Bhogle). As far as the media goes, it's not an Indian thing, it's the subcontinental thing.
Simon's tearing into Australia. This is fun.
That was awesome.So he should, not taking anything away from India(clearly the better team) but that was a shit team, and shit performance.
Tait, Johnson and Krejza
The lack of foresight by the selectors to not cultivate, a decent spinner(Razzak from Bangladesh would walk into the aussie side as a spinner) knowing that a WC in the Subcontinent was coming up is criminal.
Also to be so pig headed in that, our strength is pace, so we'll stick to that regardless of the conditions, sounds great in principle, but as this tournament has shown is horrible in practice.
Harsha Bhogle not taking the praise Simon Hughes was giving Gary Kirsten well...despite Raina thanking Gary right at the top of his interview
You know how everyone says, they hate England(football) because of the stupid fans, hype etc etc. even though in reality it's the stupid media? Well India are exactly the same. Smug as hell pundits...
To the match...India way too good for Australia in the end, 5 wicket victory with more than 2 overs to spare is pretty comprehensive.
I'd say India were favourites in the SF against Pakistan, obviously Pakistan has a better bowling lineup than Australia, and their spinners will be approximately 1000 times better, but I don't think their batting will handle the pressure(especially if they have to chase).
To be fair Sachin played really well himself today too.
Yuvraj at the press conference saying he's playing this WC to win it for Sachin. No need for that. :\
He was quite brilliant. That flick through midwicket off Johnson for four was genius.
Raina mentioned him too...Look I know it sounds a bit awkward, but some of these guys were only a couple of years old when Tendulkar started playing for India, and some probably had posters of him as schoolboys, now they're playing in the same team as he is!
So you can understand why they are so effusive in their praise of him, and I think that's fair enough, especially because he is still in the team by merit, not because of sentiment.
Raina mentioned him too...Look I know it sounds a bit awkward, but some of these guys were only a couple of years old when Tendulkar started playing for India, and some probably had posters of him as schoolboys, now they're playing in the same team as he is!
So you can understand why they are so effusive in their praise of him, and I think that's fair enough, especially because he is still in the team by merit, not because of sentiment.
Hmm...Australia should definitely have some perspective. This is a team that have gotten into the last 4 finals in a row and have won the last 3 in a row. They were bound to lose at some point.
Their attack has gone from McGrath, Clark, Lee, Bracken etc. to shite like Tait, Krezja and Hussey.
The blame certainly falls on the administrators who didn't prepare for this rather than the team out there.
Yeap, commentary now days is awful. Everyone is too repetitive and indulges in over the top descriptions of any meaningful action. Hardly an insight is offered. I feel like stabbing my ears every time I hear Shastri or Chappel on commentary.I haven't watched pre-game, half-time or post-game analysis in years and I only listen to the commentary only because you can't get the crowd noise if you turn the volume down. The standard's pretty low nowadays. Not that it was ever particularly high but briefly during the early to mid 90s, we had a period of really good commentators. Gavaskar was breaking through, Boycott was a character as were a few others including Henry Blofeld. Holding was smooth.
Nowadays, they deal only in hyperbole.
Yes, yes and yes. But there was a bit of criticism aimed towards Gambhir when he said the same thing pre-tournament, saying the focus should be on the country and they shouldn't be caught up playing for a player. There was no need for Yuvraj to bring it up, he was just being dramatic. Having said that, does it really matter to a professional? WC, at home, playing for your country.. do you need even more motivation than that? I don't think you do..
Sachin's innings was crucial since we needed to see off the first 15 without losing 2-3 wickets.He was quite brilliant. That flick through midwicket off Johnson for four was genius.
Sachin's innings was crucial since we needed to see off the first 15 without losing 2-3 wickets.
Absolutely. Bit surprised Sehwag looked so off color. I fear he may have the same problems against other pacers who don't give him the kind of room he likes. Had he fired, Sachin and him would have finished this in 40.
Munaf out, Nehra in.. I like how through shit performances our first 11's getting chiseled into what it should have been.
I haven't watched pre-game, half-time or post-game analysis in years and I only listen to the commentary only because you can't get the crowd noise if you turn the volume down. The standard's pretty low nowadays. Not that it was ever particularly high but briefly during the early to mid 90s, we had a period of really good commentators. Gavaskar was breaking through, Boycott was a character as were a few others including Henry Blofeld. Holding was smooth.
Nowadays, they deal only in hyperbole.