newgiz
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
- Messages
- 939
His touch is not bad, its fecking terrible.
Those 5 yard first time passes to the nearest player is him trying to control the ball.... it's just inconsistent at times. Sometimes his first touch will be world class and other times it will be very average. Discuss!
An inconsistent touch is a bad touch
It is not even that inconsistent. It is no more or less inconsistent than any other player that plays. It is massively overplayed on this website so people can get their little bit of attention for being the biggest "Rooney is shite"er on the site.... it's just inconsistent at times. Sometimes his first touch will be world class and other times it will be very average. Discuss!
yeah Villa this season, legendaryHe's been slightly better with it recently, which is clouding people's memory of just how god damn awful it's been in the past.
That stint of him playing possibly the worst football of his entire career was just magnified by his awful control.
I would love to watch a highlights video of him away at Villa (this year or the season before?) I think it was quite possibly the worst professional performance I've ever seen
I actually think this persistence with Rooney is a real sad state of affairs at this stage. A real lack of standards.
This is why simply posting stats mean nothing. It's like when people compare players using things like squawka matrixs or whatever. Just watch the game.
It means nothing when it suits certain people.
Fact is, Rooney's bad touch will always be noticed more than others.
It doesn't matter his touch gets noticed more than others, the point is that it's terrible for someone who is (supposedly) world class. The fact that you had to pull some random stat with no context to dispute it somewhat already showed you're also agreeing to the issue.
Random stat that shows the average of bad touches per game. Ok
So is the defence, which ranges from "Leave Britney alone" territory to "Have some respect for our loyal servant, you unraggy bastids"; but what we constantly read here is that it's his critics who are the lunatics.The criticism he gets here is way over the top.
The responses in this thread offer a different picture of the balance between his defenders/detractors. The lunacy is almost entirely on his detractors' side. The people I see defending him are far more sober by comparison.So is the defence, which ranges from "Leave Britney alone" territory to "Have some respect for our loyal servant, you unraggy bastids"; but what we constantly read here is that it's his critics who are the lunatics.
Yes well, like Rooney, they're in a very comfortable position so there's no need for them to get stressed.The responses in this thread offer a different picture of the balance between his defenders/detractors. The lunacy is almost entirely on his detractors' side. People defending him are far more sober by comparison.
Spot-on comment....He was clearly never tasked with improving it (his first touch) under Ferguson as his number one job was just to drive at the opposition and score goals.
He's way beyond the point of correcting this deficit. His time is over and Ferguson would have shipped him out long ago.
I actually think this persistence with Rooney is a real sad state of affairs at this stage. A real lack of standards.
wasn't SAF supposed to ship him out then he retired before he could do so? of course I objected to that at the time but way things have shaped up it makes perfect sense now.He was clearly never tasked with improving it (his first touch) under Ferguson as his number one job was just to drive at the opposition and score goals.
He's way beyond the point of correcting this deficit. His time is over and Ferguson would have shipped him out long ago.
I actually think this persistence with Rooney is a real sad state of affairs at this stage. A real lack of standards.
he put him in a compromising situation publicly by again saying he asked to leave. Usually he fiercely protects his playerswasn't SAF supposed to ship him out then he retired before he could do so? of course I objected to that at the time but way things have shaped up it makes perfect sense now.
wasn't SAF supposed to ship him out then he retired before he could do so? of course I objected to that at the time but way things have shaped up it makes perfect sense now.
So you took into account how many touches in total they have a game compared to each other, what is the percentage of those bad touches? How BAD is "bad" and the in game situation that led to those to say the least?
By your logic, the list above those you named have better touch and the list below worse in general?
Similarly if I say Langerak average 4.5 saves a game, higher than anyone else does that mean he's the best shot stopper in the game? Stats mean absolutely nothing without proper context, hence random.
His touch is fine.
It's made to look worse because he tends plays at at a higher tempo than most whilst trying to do about 5 things at the same. All his managers have built teams around him, despite posters repeatedly claiming he's finished. The coaches he plays under (and the teammates he plays with) see what he provides the team and how he puts opponents on the back foot. He's not as great as he was, but he's still very good. The criticism he gets here is way over the top.
I always thought it was weird how people would try to contrast Berbatov's touch with Rooney's. One played at 5mph and the other at 100mph. Granted, Rooney has slowed down a bit, but he's still a very direct player. It's not comparing like with like.
Mourinho will love him and he's as good a manager as you'll find anywhere.
Most judging him as a player in all these threads say the same several things about him as a player, why is that?A lot of people simply lack emotional control when it comes to Rooney. His far too high wage and him holding us at ransom prevents people from objectively judging him as a player.