Gabriel Djemba-Bebe
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2018
- Messages
- 3,927
He was robbed of the Ballon d'Or. Rivaldo's Barca didn't even get out of the CL group stage that year.He came second in the Ballon d'Or Ranking in 1999 after Rivaldo.
He was robbed of the Ballon d'Or. Rivaldo's Barca didn't even get out of the CL group stage that year.He came second in the Ballon d'Or Ranking in 1999 after Rivaldo.
Great post, enjoyed reading that.This is exactly right. Beckham was a midfielder, not a forward. In a modern system he would rarely play as a RW, not least because most 4-3-3 formations used inverted forwards with an opposing strongest foot.
He would, as you quite rightly say, play on the right of a midfield 3, and he would be brilliant at it. Naturally able to overload that right hand side and whip a lot of balls into the box, but also being at the heart of the midfield. His switches of play to create overloads is something that would be gold dust in todays game where coaches love to bring all the play over to one side, and then look for a quick switch to the opposing flank to create one on one’s out wide in space. No-one in today’s game could make that quick switch with the speed of thought and accuracy that Beckham was able to.
Just think how people marvel every time TAA pulls off a great 60 yard pass. It ends up with interminable rantings about his suitability for midfield. Beckham would pull off 5-10 of those every game. Probably the best medium and long range passer I have ever seen. It’s amazing to think that at one point United had two players, in Scholes and Beckham, who could be counted amongst the top ten long range passers of all time, in the same team. Couple that with one of the best, most complete wingers of all time, and one of the best box to box midfielders of all time, it’s no surprise that United just hoovered up trophies in that era. A modern iteration of that team would likely have Keane, Scholes and Beckham as the midfield three, with Giggs on the right, Cole up front, and I’d venture a different signing to Yorke to play off the left. If not the man himself.
I think I already answered this thread, but Beckham was bloody brilliant. One of England and United’s best ever players. He had everything you’d want in a midfielder, and added to that a dead ball delivery that is amongst the best I’ve seen in the game. His ability to hit a cross from a moving ball, is also something that he did better than anyone else I’ve seen. What escapes most people about Beckham is how hard he worked, on and off the field. His celebrity nature created a false impression of a player who was a tireless worker and perfectionist. If he came into our team now, he’d instantly be our best player and by some distance, he’d also be one of the top 3-5 players in the league, easily.
Football changes over time, which is why it is so hard to compare players across eras. 4-4-2, or variations of it (4-4-1-1 etc.) were really the dominant tactical approach throughout Beckham’s time at United, which naturally placed him at RW, but he was more of a wide midfielder. He overlapped a lot, but he also underlapped equally so, with Neville proving the perfect foil going outside of him. With Giggs so often running from deep, and wide, it was not unusual for Beckham to tuck in on that side to provide a more compact midfield, especially as and when Scholes broke forwards to join the attack. Our shape was never so prosaic as to be a traditional 4-4-2, but its foundations were certainly in that shape.
Football has become so structured and positional, that a lot of players from that era would’ve struggled to reach the heights they did in their era, if translated to the modern game. But Beckham wasn’t one of them. In fact, most players from the great United teams would’ve thrived in this era of positional play. The question marks come against the more maverick talents. The Cantona’s of this world. Where would he fit in a modern system? As a midfielder? As a ten? I doubt he had the work rate or mentality for such a dogmatic interpretation of the game. The only role I could see him excelling at in the modern era would be that of a false 9. You wouldn’t get a ton of energetic pressing from him, but you would get a player that could link up play and find space like few others.
Beckham brought industry, delivery, discipline and accuracy. He’d thrive more than ever today. It’s the artists of previous eras, the Cantona’s and Bergkamps that would have to be different.
Ah I'm misremembering, that's not as mental then.He was 32 when he joined LA Galaxy.
Thank you.Great post, enjoyed reading that.
I agree. During lock down I had a look at quite a few old Man Utd-games during that period. Keane and Beckhan was our best players at the time. By quite a distance.
As a kid, I would just say Beckham was the best because he was my favourite. My footballing hero back then. I tried, and failed, to style my hair after his, practiced his kicking technique for hours on end, had him on the back of every shirt, constantly passed to him in the older fifa games just to score with himI'd say Stam was fairly close (and Yorke during the treble season), but otherwise yeah.
He was 31 when he joined real Madrid.Thank you.
It is also worth noting that Beckham still holds the record for most direct free kick goals in premier league history (18), despite leaving for Madrid at just 27. In the end, he finished his career with 32 free kick goals just across league competitions. If he had stayed at United for the entirety of his career, like Scholes, it’s fair to assume he’d probably be somewhere around 30 FK goals in the league, which would put him nearly double the next highest player - James Ward Prowse (17). Which just shows how deadly he was from a dead ball.
He’s also 10th in the all time assists table for the PL, with everybody above him in the list having played anywhere from 75 to nearly 400 games more than him. With the exception of Kevin De Bruyne, who has 30 more assists in 5 less games, but plays a much more attacking role. Steven Gerrard for example, has just 13 more assists despite playing 250 games more than Beckham in the PL. James Milner has 9 more assists in 400 additional games. Dennis Bergkamp, a creative striker known more for his providing than his outright goalscoring, just 14 more assists in 50 extra games.
It’s a story that actually brings me to another United player who sometimes fails to get the plaudits he deserves, Wayne Rooney. People know him for being the third highest PL scorer of all time with 208 PL goals, but not many remember that he’s also the 4th highest assister in PL history, behind Giggs, De Bruyne and Fábregas.
For sheer, versatility, threat, work rate, team work and technical brilliance, there is no version of a best United XI of the last 30 odd years that doesn’t include Beckham and Rooney. Players that possessed true world class ability, but players who could always be counted on to play for the team and run themselves into the ground. Legends.
He was actually 28.He was 31 when he joined real Madrid.
No he wasn’t. He last played in the PL at 27. The Madrid transfer was announced in June 2003. He was born in May 1975. He last played in the PL in the 2002-03 season when he was 27. He joined Madrid in the summer of 2003, shortly after he turned 28.He was 31 when he joined real Madrid.
He was actually 28.
I googled it and it said 31, the Google ai failed me.No he wasn’t. He last played in the PL at 27. The Madrid transfer was announced in June 2003. He was born in May 1975. He last played in the PL in the 2002-03 season when he was 27. He joined Madrid in the summer of 2003, shortly after he turned 28.
The post quoted below, correcting yours, is accurate. As was mine saying he last played in the PL at 27. No idea where you got 31 from. Maybe you are confusing it with his move from La Liga to MLS.
Eh? WTF?He was 31 when he joined real Madrid.
What a great post Simon. I agree with everything you said, Specially the bit of Beckham walking into our current XI and instantly becoming the best player of the team and captain. Probably not the kind of player who would single handely makes us compete for trophies by himself, he´s not CR7 or Messi tier at all (Who else is?) but he would be the light among these bunch of wankers of todays UtdThis is exactly right. Beckham was a midfielder, not a forward. In a modern system he would rarely play as a RW, not least because most 4-3-3 formations used inverted forwards with an opposing strongest foot.
He would, as you quite rightly say, play on the right of a midfield 3, and he would be brilliant at it. Naturally able to overload that right hand side and whip a lot of balls into the box, but also being at the heart of the midfield. His switches of play to create overloads is something that would be gold dust in todays game where coaches love to bring all the play over to one side, and then look for a quick switch to the opposing flank to create one on one’s out wide in space. No-one in today’s game could make that quick switch with the speed of thought and accuracy that Beckham was able to.
Just think how people marvel every time TAA pulls off a great 60 yard pass. It ends up with interminable rantings about his suitability for midfield. Beckham would pull off 5-10 of those every game. Probably the best medium and long range passer I have ever seen. It’s amazing to think that at one point United had two players, in Scholes and Beckham, who could be counted amongst the top ten long range passers of all time, in the same team. Couple that with one of the best, most complete wingers of all time, and one of the best box to box midfielders of all time, it’s no surprise that United just hoovered up trophies in that era. A modern iteration of that team would likely have Keane, Scholes and Beckham as the midfield three, with Giggs on the right, Cole up front, and I’d venture a different signing to Yorke to play off the left. If not the man himself.
I think I already answered this thread, but Beckham was bloody brilliant. One of England and United’s best ever players. He had everything you’d want in a midfielder, and added to that a dead ball delivery that is amongst the best I’ve seen in the game. His ability to hit a cross from a moving ball, is also something that he did better than anyone else I’ve seen. What escapes most people about Beckham is how hard he worked, on and off the field. His celebrity nature created a false impression of a player who was a tireless worker and perfectionist. If he came into our team now, he’d instantly be our best player and by some distance, he’d also be one of the top 3-5 players in the league, easily.
Football changes over time, which is why it is so hard to compare players across eras. 4-4-2, or variations of it (4-4-1-1 etc.) were really the dominant tactical approach throughout Beckham’s time at United, which naturally placed him at RW, but he was more of a wide midfielder. He overlapped a lot, but he also underlapped equally so, with Neville proving the perfect foil going outside of him. With Giggs so often running from deep, and wide, it was not unusual for Beckham to tuck in on that side to provide a more compact midfield, especially as and when Scholes broke forwards to join the attack. Our shape was never so prosaic as to be a traditional 4-4-2, but its foundations were certainly in that shape.
Football has become so structured and positional, that a lot of players from that era would’ve struggled to reach the heights they did in their era, if translated to the modern game. But Beckham wasn’t one of them. In fact, most players from the great United teams would’ve thrived in this era of positional play. The question marks come against the more maverick talents. The Cantona’s of this world. Where would he fit in a modern system? As a midfielder? As a ten? I doubt he had the work rate or mentality for such a dogmatic interpretation of the game. The only role I could see him excelling at in the modern era would be that of a false 9. You wouldn’t get a ton of energetic pressing from him, but you would get a player that could link up play and find space like few others.
Beckham brought industry, delivery, discipline and accuracy. He’d thrive more than ever today. It’s the artists of previous eras, the Cantona’s and Bergkamps that would have to be different.
Sign him up!This is exactly right. Beckham was a midfielder, not a forward. In a modern system he would rarely play as a RW, not least because most 4-3-3 formations used inverted forwards with an opposing strongest foot.
He would, as you quite rightly say, play on the right of a midfield 3, and he would be brilliant at it. Naturally able to overload that right hand side and whip a lot of balls into the box, but also being at the heart of the midfield. His switches of play to create overloads is something that would be gold dust in todays game where coaches love to bring all the play over to one side, and then look for a quick switch to the opposing flank to create one on one’s out wide in space. No-one in today’s game could make that quick switch with the speed of thought and accuracy that Beckham was able to.
Just think how people marvel every time TAA pulls off a great 60 yard pass. It ends up with interminable rantings about his suitability for midfield. Beckham would pull off 5-10 of those every game. Probably the best medium and long range passer I have ever seen. It’s amazing to think that at one point United had two players, in Scholes and Beckham, who could be counted amongst the top ten long range passers of all time, in the same team. Couple that with one of the best, most complete wingers of all time, and one of the best box to box midfielders of all time, it’s no surprise that United just hoovered up trophies in that era. A modern iteration of that team would likely have Keane, Scholes and Beckham as the midfield three, with Giggs on the right, Cole up front, and I’d venture a different signing to Yorke to play off the left. If not the man himself.
I think I already answered this thread, but Beckham was bloody brilliant. One of England and United’s best ever players. He had everything you’d want in a midfielder, and added to that a dead ball delivery that is amongst the best I’ve seen in the game. His ability to hit a cross from a moving ball, is also something that he did better than anyone else I’ve seen. What escapes most people about Beckham is how hard he worked, on and off the field. His celebrity nature created a false impression of a player who was a tireless worker and perfectionist. If he came into our team now, he’d instantly be our best player and by some distance, he’d also be one of the top 3-5 players in the league, easily.
Football changes over time, which is why it is so hard to compare players across eras. 4-4-2, or variations of it (4-4-1-1 etc.) were really the dominant tactical approach throughout Beckham’s time at United, which naturally placed him at RW, but he was more of a wide midfielder. He overlapped a lot, but he also underlapped equally so, with Neville proving the perfect foil going outside of him. With Giggs so often running from deep, and wide, it was not unusual for Beckham to tuck in on that side to provide a more compact midfield, especially as and when Scholes broke forwards to join the attack. Our shape was never so prosaic as to be a traditional 4-4-2, but its foundations were certainly in that shape.
Football has become so structured and positional, that a lot of players from that era would’ve struggled to reach the heights they did in their era, if translated to the modern game. But Beckham wasn’t one of them. In fact, most players from the great United teams would’ve thrived in this era of positional play. The question marks come against the more maverick talents. The Cantona’s of this world. Where would he fit in a modern system? As a midfielder? As a ten? I doubt he had the work rate or mentality for such a dogmatic interpretation of the game. The only role I could see him excelling at in the modern era would be that of a false 9. You wouldn’t get a ton of energetic pressing from him, but you would get a player that could link up play and find space like few others.
Beckham brought industry, delivery, discipline and accuracy. He’d thrive more than ever today. It’s the artists of previous eras, the Cantona’s and Bergkamps that would have to be different.
I actually think Beckham's huge workrate and willingness to do his defensive duty also played a part in how attacking we could otherwise be. If we'd had a normal attacking winger on that side I'm not sure we could have had as much success as we did with such an attacking midfielder as Scholes was in those days. Obviously Keane was the main one though.
Decline in the last two seasons? His best season for United in terms of goals was 01/02.He was an excellent player for United. His decline in his last two seasons with us was unfortunate though. It won't be a popular opinion but by the end he was rightly a squad player with Ole regularly playing on the right wing instead.
He seemed to offer less to United the more his role with England increased, the bigger profile he had the less he produced for us but Beckham from 95-96 to 2000-01 was exceptionally good.
I will add that any iteration of Beckham throughout his career would be light years ahead of what we've produced over the last decade.
Obviously a lot of my favourite moments of his are going to United and England based, but this assist to Ronaldo at Real Madrid always blew me away:
He’ll help us qualify for the CL alone if he played like how he did for England.What a great post Simon. I agree with everything you said, Specially the bit of Beckham walking into our current XI and instantly becoming the best player of the team and captain. Probably not the kind of player who would single handely makes us compete for trophies by himself, he´s not CR7 or Messi tier at all (Who else is?) but he would be the light among these bunch of wankers of todays Utd
Totally agree. The celebrity has diluted the footballer over the years. So many wonderful goals and moments, we were blessed.He's become underrated. Aside from his attacking play, the man was a proper work horse. Top top player. We had a great midfield, didn't we.
WardProwse has 17, is 29 so probably beats Beckhams 18. Ward Prowse also has a significantly better conversion rate, Beckham in PL was about 9%, JWP is about 14%Good footballer with the best set-pieces the premier League has ever seen.
Just checked - Beckham is in a League of his own in goals from freekicks. He scored 18 - no other player has more than 12
Now say something nice about our Becks.WardProwse has 17, is 29 so probably beats Beckhams 18. Ward Prowse also has a significantly better conversion rate, Beckham in PL was about 9%, JWP is about 14%
Especially when he's standing next to Jamie bloody Carragher or "burst onto the scene" Micah Richards.He peaked higher than Scholes and Giggs and was genuinely one of the best players on the planet.
Best crosser ever, arguably the best set piece taker ever after Juninho, great passing range, amazing shot and very hardworking. His only weakness would be his dribbling ability.
His global celebrity status resulted in him being majorly underrated by football fans.
That right flank of United is one of the most underrated ever. Beckham due to his celebrity status off the pitch and Neville because he downplays his own career at every opportunity. Nothing annoys me more than Gary Neville pretending he was a bang average player.
Beckham was one of the best right wingers in the traditional 442, passing and set pieces world classNow say something nice about our Becks.
WardProwse has 17, is 29 so probably beats Beckhams 18. Ward Prowse also has a significantly better conversion rate, Beckham in PL was about 9%, JWP is about 14%
Very good player but hugely overrated.
No left foot, couldn't tackle, poor header of the ball, no burning pace.Great right foot though, good attitude, good work rate.
hence conversion rate, Beckham had a lot more opportunities, two greats of the direct free kickJWP also had almost 400 matches in the P.L to reach 17 goals - Becks played 265
Obviously a lot of my favourite moments of his are going to United and England based, but this assist to Ronaldo at Real Madrid always blew me away:
Ha!Sounds like what George Best said
"
"He cannot kick with his left foot, he cannot head a ball, he cannot tackle and he doesn't score many goals. Apart from that, he's all right."