Longlivekeano
Full Member
Seeing this, I appreciate The King even more for walking out with his collar up high
Interesting one.
With someone like Schweinsteiger or Blanc it's really easy - they were great players, I saw them in a Utd shirt, but they were not great United players because by the time they played in that shirt they were clearly on the decline.
Bit more complicated with the likes of Larsson or Cavani or Zlatan, certainly in parts they were still playing at a really high level, but by and large I think I'd say that they were great players who I saw be good, occasionally great, in a United shirt, but not great United players.
Ronaldo is different. I don't think many people would argue that he was at his best at United - clearly he played at his best, consistently, at Madrid. But was his level in 07/08 up there with the seasons that put him in the conversation for best of all time, or are we looking back knowing that's what he became and seeing something that (although a spectacular season) wasn't quite there?
For me it's the second one. There's no doubt he was special that year, but I've seen spectacular seasons from players in that shirt - and I've also seen players be consistently great in it, even if not to that level, which for me is a great player (as Ronaldo then was for Madrid).
This might be exactly what you meant with the way you phrased it, right? I would probably agree that Ronaldo is the best player (on the basis of his career as a whole) I've ever seen play for United. But not the best United player I've seen.
Well put. I know football is an emotional game but i'm surprised people can't understand this about him. His almost insane appetite to be the best and his obnoxious selfishness is just the nature of the beast and as he's getting older it's just no longer worth putting up with anymore in the expectation that the good points outweigh the bad. I'm not defending him, i'm just saying "why are people surprised?". I find it very hard to hate him even if I don't like him or his behaviour sometimes.Not for me. But that's simply because I never made him out to be anything other than what he was, and insanely talented, extremely driven footballer. I was a huge fan his first stint, as I was invested in seeing him flourish but even when he did in those glorious seasons, I never really pegged him as a team player.
I was hesitant when he came back as I've seen Portugal hampered by the "everyone pass to Ronaldo" tactic a good few times, but I hoped with good management and sensible players, we'd avoid that and he'd be able to add something to a growing team. We didn't avoid the route Ronaldo football and I quickly realised his net effect on the team was negative.
However, nothing he's done has surprised me, so I'm simply a United fan grateful for the good times he gave us but realistic to know that he's an issue right now, and he was last season as well despite the goals.
Not remotely the point. Keane blatantly disrespected his team mates publically and questioned the seriousness and competence of SAF himself and his staff like Quieroz. An offense deemed previous enough for Fergie and the club to sack him. No fan alive would dare use it to question his legacy.The difference is Keano cared about the club's performance, and the players didn't mind being called out by their captain on standards which had slipped. ........
Scholes himself played truant for a carling cup game. No one ever holds it against him
Anyone who actually believes what CR7 did is worse is straight up lying to themselves.
Not only was the Scholes situation a one-off isolated incident, Scholes also didn't make a public show of refusing to play that game. He told Fergie privately that he wasn't travelling to the game. Whereas what Ronaldo did was a very deliberate way of publicly undermining the club. Therefore it's pretty obvious to see why so many United fans perceive Ronaldo's conduct to be worse than Scholes'.
Ole’s legacy is from him playing for us not managing us so completely different situations. With Ronnie he’s legacy as a player is still being written and him acting like a child will be added to that!People said that Ole was ruining his legacy just for not doing his job too well despite trying his best. If you were one of those, then there should be no other answer to the thread title for you but a resounding yes.
His bitching about being a slave soured it for me, let alone all his bs ths time round.Looking back I'd rather him never returned even if that means we have to rely on the injury prone Twang because now I can't look at Ronaldo the same anymore. Sure he's always been arrogant but his abilities used to make up for it. You could say it's part of his charm, arrogant but top professional. Now he's fecking bad and doesn't want to admit it, guy is older than 90% of premier league and still thinks he needs to start every game. On top of performance issues, he keeps leaving matches early (disrespecting the manager).
Not to mention he also disrespected the club by bitching about not being in CL and wanting out even though he knew the state of the club before joining. It's the risk he took, which he got paid handsomely for and yet he has the audacity to be a spoilt old baby demanding CL football when no CL club wants him anyway. As far as I know, no one at United has ever disrespected him since his return. Even Ten Hag is still giving him chances.
I don't despise him but it's hard to see him as a club legend anymore. When he joined Real Madrid, at least we got money. Now he's not only draining money in salary but also stalling the progress of the squad as he's not suitable for Ten Hag tactics.
You can argue that if he left Juve for City, his legacy will also be ruined but at least he won't be our problem and City was going to win it with or without him anyway.
Interesting one.
With someone like Schweinsteiger or Blanc it's really easy - they were great players, I saw them in a Utd shirt, but they were not great United players because by the time they played in that shirt they were clearly on the decline.
Bit more complicated with the likes of Larsson or Cavani or Zlatan, certainly in parts they were still playing at a really high level, but by and large I think I'd say that they were great players who I saw be good, occasionally great, in a United shirt, but not great United players.
Ronaldo is different. I don't think many people would argue that he was at his best at United - clearly he played at his best, consistently, at Madrid. But was his level in 07/08 up there with the seasons that put him in the conversation for best of all time, or are we looking back knowing that's what he became and seeing something that (although a spectacular season) wasn't quite there?
For me it's the second one. There's no doubt he was special that year, but I've seen spectacular seasons from players in that shirt - and I've also seen players be consistently great in it, even if not to that level, which for me is a great player (as Ronaldo then was for Madrid).
This might be exactly what you meant with the way you phrased it, right? I would probably agree that Ronaldo is the best player (on the basis of his career as a whole) I've ever seen play for United. But not the best United player I've seen.
Frankly I don't get this ' isolated incident " excuse. CR7 refusing to be a late sub IS an isolated incident. It s still just as wrong.Not only was the Scholes situation a one-off isolated incident, Scholes also didn't make a public show of refusing to play that game. He told Fergie privately that he wasn't travelling to the game. Whereas what Ronaldo did was a very deliberate way of publicly undermining the club. Therefore it's pretty obvious to see why so many United fans perceive Ronaldo's conduct to be worse than Scholes'.
I think he was right for doing that Feck the Racist.Nah no way. Maradona was largely shite and troubled during later stage of his career, but Argentinian people/Napoli fans still worshipped him like God. Cantona cost us literally a title by getting banned kicking a fan on the stands, he is still king of Old Trafford. Legend will always be legend even they are going through all their troubles/downfall.
Frankly I don't get this ' isolated incident " excuse. CR7 refusing to be a late sub IS an isolated incident. It s still just as wrong.
I hope you saw what Roy Keane had to say about the Scholes incident yesterday. If you think the likes of Keane don't consider it worse....
Understatement of the century.in danger of tarnishing his legacy.
Fanboy
FanboyThe way United fans tend to treat Rooney - I don’t think being a United Legend is all that of an asset anyway.
Giggs is a legend because his trashy behaviour did not affect United. He did what he did on his personal space.I don't think so. You have to be able to seperate the person from the player and the player we had was an absolute joy to watch.
Someone like giggs is still a United legend but he's a trash human.
That's for me, I know other people won't see it that way.
Fanboy