Has political correctness actually gone mad?

I feel like this conversation is beginning to delve into the extremes and routing off course, which it often does when it comes to political correctness and the perspectives of marginalised communities. And a part of me wants to talk about it in depth to help those of you who don't understand but want to - but another part of me is utterly exhausted at having to expand energy & labour to express such a personal perspective to people who ultimately will never have any idea of what it's like to be a black woman in society, only to have those perspectives reduced to and laughed off as hyperbole every time. It's exhausting & infuriating in equal measure.

Here is a video of Jesy sometime in the last few days, she's a shade or two lighter than the presenter who's actually black.


Here's a picture of Jesy without any tans for reference (sorry for the size)
FBUt53RVcAg2fnk

I fail to see how her 'tan' can be deemed as anything other than excessive & unnecessary.
Nobody is stopping her from doing it, but surely she can be criticised for benefitting from picking & choosing parts of a culture she is not from originally?

Ask any black woman whether their features have been mocked and made fun of throughout their life and the overwhelming answer will be 'Yes'.
Those same features are being bought as part of a buy 1 get 1 free special at every plastic surgeon by non-black women, and they continue to represent symbols of beauty both in a historical eurocentric beauty standard (skinny, white, blonde hair, blue eyes etc), and a modern day 'kim kardashian' (darker skin, bigger lips, curvy body, bigger butt etc) beauty standard.
This is how black features get praised when they are not on black people - leading to erasure of black women from the topics of beauty standards, because we can't conform to the traditional eurocentric beauty standard, and even when our features are being praised and celebrated, that praise only comes when they appear on non-black women.

That's where the pushback comes from. Black women have had to create beauty standards of our own because of racism, have been excluded from just about every mainstream conversation when it comes to beauty, also because of racism, yet when the standards that we've created do become mainstream & celebrated - it's only due to it being picked up by non-black women, you guessed it - because of racism.
Surely you can see why that would cause people to be upset? It just reaffirms that there's no space for black women to be celebrated.
If black features on black skin was celebrated and seen as beautiful, then blackfishing wouldn't be an issue.
From that hopefully you can see why 'whitefishing' isn't really a thing, in the same way 'reverse racism' isn't really a thing.

Agree, or disagree - I don't really have the patience to debate the topic much further, because it's kinda dehumanising & exhausting, and i'm not trying to be a dick when I say that, it's just hard to express just how tiring it is having to validate your feelings & experiences repeatedly.
And anyone who is genuine about wanting to be educated on the topic can find smarter, more articulate people who have spoken at length about these issues online and in books.

@Isotope @2 man midfield @Pogue Mahone
 
It's a lot to comment on if you don't have an understanding of the history of how the media has represented eurocentric features which are typical for white women vs features that are typical to black women, so I would start there if you wanted to do some research on the topic.
But long story short, Jesy being ridiculed for her natural appearance meant that she turned to and was able to pick and choose which typically black features she wanted to accentuate (bigger lips, darker skin, curly hair etc) to alleviate her self-confidence. She's able to do this because there's a history of white women succeeding & profiting by doing the exact same thing (e.g. the entire Kardashian family) without having to face the racism and ridicule that black women have had to endure throughout history because black features are only deemed desirable when they aren't on black skin.
Meanwhile black women continue to endure those same self-confidence issues without having the luxury to co-opt eurocentric features, and still aren't seen as an example of what classic beauty is, despite 'the kardashian look' being a blueprint for pretty much the majority of young girls in western society today, and for the last 10 years or so.
The real issue that needs to be addressed is those in the media & public who deem it acceptable to be fatphobic (I assume this is what Jesy went through) and drive down the self confidence of similar young girls, and for her to seek counselling for the trauma she experienced rather than simply freely co-opting blackness when it's convenient and profitable.
They're caucasian? Like 100%?

wow..
 
I think it's a little ignorant of history for someone to claim anyone adopting hip-hop style automatically qualifies as "cultural appropriation."

Many of the original graffiti artists were from different races (IE Tracy 168, Crash Matos, Keith Haring, Lady Pink). Breakdancing itself borrowed heavily and evolved from Brazilian Capoeira, etc. Hiphop absolutely has a heavy black American heritage but it's never been exclusively black American. People that get into hip-hop around the world are not "appropriating culture", they are joining a subculture that speaks to them. When someone is legit into hip-hop and has legit claims (Eminem) then no one really believes it appropriation. It's only when it comes off as completely fake and pushed by corporate marketing (Vanilla Ice) that it can veer into controversial territory. After all, you have hip-hop artists around the world from China to Brazil to Russia.
 
Last edited:
They're actually literally Caucasian, from Armenian descent.
( I realize the word caucasian also sometimes gets used as a synonym for white)
Kardashian is an Albanian name. So that side is definitely Caucasian.

Though, Indians are Caucasian, so Caucasians can have a tan.
Ah yes, I was mixing it up with white.
 
They're actually literally Caucasian, from Armenian descent.
( I realize the word caucasian also sometimes gets used as a synonym for white)

Fun fact: many, many Armenians do not view themselves as "white" which they view as purely European and they have also experienced many historical insults deriving from ethnic aspects of their appearance. Oh and many Armenians naturally have darker skin (than Europeans), curvier body types, and bigger butts so not sure Kardashians are really a sound example of "appropriating" culture.
 
wait till you find out how many millions they’ve made appropriating black culture.
I'm well aware that these feck nuggets are very rich. Part of why I'm not entirely in favor of democracy, the popularity of the Kardashians.
 
Times change. Fashions change. I’m well aware it used to be a sign of wealth to be pale. I also know what the acronym ‘posh’ means. But that was a long time ago. The meaning of tanned skin has changed a lot since it stigmatised a person as working class.

But none of that is really relevant to the point I made, which is that there’s more to tanned skin than appropriating the skin tone of black people.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/posh-history-and-meaning
 
Fun fact: many, many Armenians do not view themselves as "white" which they view as purely European and they have also experienced many historical insults deriving from ethnic aspects of their appearance. Oh and many Armenians naturally have darker skin (than Europeans), curvier body types, and bigger butts so not sure Kardashians are really a sound example of "appropriating" culture.

Agree with this. I've never looked at her and thought she's looks black. She looks ethnically Persian which isn't a surprise given that she's from Armenian heritage.
 
I saw today there is a massive electronic billboard advert at the Holland Park/Shepherd's Bush roundabout that has is looping adverts for her new single with a Black Lives Matter ad, then some random one, which raised an eyebrow when I saw it.
 
I feel like this conversation is beginning to delve into the extremes and routing off course, which it often does when it comes to political correctness and the perspectives of marginalised communities. And a part of me wants to talk about it in depth to help those of you who don't understand but want to - but another part of me is utterly exhausted at having to expand energy & labour to express such a personal perspective to people who ultimately will never have any idea of what it's like to be a black woman in society, only to have those perspectives reduced to and laughed off as hyperbole every time. It's exhausting & infuriating in equal measure.

Here is a video of Jesy sometime in the last few days, she's a shade or two lighter than the presenter who's actually black.


Here's a picture of Jesy without any tans for reference (sorry for the size)
FBUt53RVcAg2fnk

I fail to see how her 'tan' can be deemed as anything other than excessive & unnecessary.
Nobody is stopping her from doing it, but surely she can be criticised for benefitting from picking & choosing parts of a culture she is not from originally?

Ask any black woman whether their features have been mocked and made fun of throughout their life and the overwhelming answer will be 'Yes'.
Those same features are being bought as part of a buy 1 get 1 free special at every plastic surgeon by non-black women, and they continue to represent symbols of beauty both in a historical eurocentric beauty standard (skinny, white, blonde hair, blue eyes etc), and a modern day 'kim kardashian' (darker skin, bigger lips, curvy body, bigger butt etc) beauty standard.
This is how black features get praised when they are not on black people - leading to erasure of black women from the topics of beauty standards, because we can't conform to the traditional eurocentric beauty standard, and even when our features are being praised and celebrated, that praise only comes when they appear on non-black women.

That's where the pushback comes from. Black women have had to create beauty standards of our own because of racism, have been excluded from just about every mainstream conversation when it comes to beauty, also because of racism, yet when the standards that we've created do become mainstream & celebrated - it's only due to it being picked up by non-black women, you guessed it - because of racism.
Surely you can see why that would cause people to be upset? It just reaffirms that there's no space for black women to be celebrated.
If black features on black skin was celebrated and seen as beautiful, then blackfishing wouldn't be an issue.
From that hopefully you can see why 'whitefishing' isn't really a thing, in the same way 'reverse racism' isn't really a thing.

Agree, or disagree - I don't really have the patience to debate the topic much further, because it's kinda dehumanising & exhausting, and i'm not trying to be a dick when I say that, it's just hard to express just how tiring it is having to validate your feelings & experiences repeatedly.
And anyone who is genuine about wanting to be educated on the topic can find smarter, more articulate people who have spoken at length about these issues online and in books.

@Isotope @2 man midfield @Pogue Mahone

Holy shit, that’s a bit beyond a tan and a few braids. She’s gone way over the top there.

I definitely get why black people would feel pissed off at this sort of thing. I guess it’s a bit like - and bear with me - if you were denied entry to a club, so decided to go off and start your own thing, but then later on those same people got wind of what you were doing, gatecrashed the party, took all your decorations and booze and fecked off back to their club - before getting lots of praise from other clubbers about this amazing club and it’s new decorations. All while you sit there livid because you’ve been wronged not once but twice.

To be fair I guess it’s a sign of white privilege that the only reference point I can come up with is some shit nightclub analogy, but hopefully you see my logic. You’d definitely feel like telling Jesy Nelson to do one, anyway.
 
Holy shit, that’s a bit beyond a tan and a few braids. She’s gone way over the top there.

I definitely get why black people would feel pissed off at this sort of thing. I guess it’s a bit like - and bear with me - if you were denied entry to a club, so decided to go off and start your own thing, but then later on those same people got wind of what you were doing, gatecrashed the party, took all your decorations and booze and fecked off back to their club - before getting lots of praise from other clubbers about this amazing club and it’s new decorations. All while you sit there livid because you’ve been wronged not once but twice.

To be fair I guess it’s a sign of white privilege that the only reference point I can come up with is some shit nightclub analogy, but hopefully you see my logic. You’d definitely feel like telling Jesy Nelson to do one, anyway.

Haha I definitely get your logic and it's not a terrible analogy all things considered because something similar is precisely how a lot of black culture began, and why there's stuff like "black history month", "black entertainment television" etc. If you continue to exclude us from things, we then have to make our own space to feel safe & celebrated. If you then come back and infiltrate those spaces we've made and we say something about your actions, the onus is on us to be the bigger person and allow it.
In the case of blackfishing it gets to a point where as black women there's so much we already have to navigate in society, that when the few things we have get co-opted as the work of others, or is seen positively only when others do it - it's just utterly demoralising.

The fact that I can type something like 'the kim kardashian blueprint' and everyone who reads it knows exactly what I mean & just how popular & common it is, when all she did was accentuate features black women have naturally yet there's no celebration of that look when it's on black skin. It's gotten completely whitewashed, pun intended.
 
The more I think about it, cultural appropriation can be illustrated up by the movie Bring It On.
It's a great movie too, which also touches on sexploitation of women's bodies and sexism that male cheerleaders face, plus it's just funny.

Now I wanna watch it.
 
Weird it may be, but I'm not sure I quite grasp the issue with white artists performing as a stereotype of black men that black men created themselves.
Black men didn’t create that stereotype though, it’s the media that created the perception that
wearing durags and baggy clothes somehow makes you a ‘bad boy’. That’s part of the reason why people are pissed off, she’s reinforcing this shallow stereotype without having to suffer the same scrutiny that black artists face.

AJ Tracey, a black rapper had similar optics in his video and was accused of glorifying gang culture. You can’t see the issue with the double standards?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....ire-show-interview-with-aj-tracey-2447967?amp
 
Black men didn’t create that stereotype though, it’s the media that created the perception that
wearing durags and baggy clothes somehow makes you a ‘bad boy’. That’s part of the reason why people are pissed off, she’s reinforcing this shallow stereotype without having to suffer the same scrutiny that black artists face.

AJ Tracey, a black rapper had similar optics in his video and was accused of glorifying gang culture. You can’t see the issue with the double standards?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.nme.com/news/music/laden-with-racist-stereotypes-backlash-from-viewers-over-victoria-derbyshire-show-interview-with-aj-tracey-2447967?amp

No, it's music, a performance...I just can't connect with the idea that it's a big issue. If it is problematic I don't think it's something to be focussing much time on.
 
No, it's music, a performance...I just can't connect with the idea that it's a big issue. If it is problematic I don't think it's something to be focussing much time on.
Easy to say when it doesn’t impact you. Ignorance is indeed bliss.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-58882822

Nicki Minaj defends Jesy Nelson in 'blackfishing' row
Nicki Minaj blasts Miley Cyrus over cultural appropriation

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/roll...lasts-miley-cyrus-cultural-appropriation/amp/
Nicki:

The fact that you feel upset about me speaking on something that affects Black women makes me feel like you have some big balls. You’re in videos with Black men, and you’re bringing out Black women on your stages, but you don’t want to know how Black women feel about something that’s so important?
 
Last edited:
But who is it impacting? Where is the evidence this has any impact of any sort? To me it just seems like a load of fuss over nothing. You could even paint 'blackfishing' as a positive celebration of black culture.
Honestly, people have explained numerous times in this thread but you’ve repeatedly dismissed it, even saying it’s a topic that only exists on the internet so I’m not going to bother explaining again. If you really care, which I very much doubt, read through @villain and @Mockney’s posts amongst others.
 
A race doesn't own a certain type of music. people borrow from all cultures and not just in music.
It’s not just music when there is a huge $$ sign attached to it. And there is a long history of artists screwing over black people. I was also mostly responding to your and some other poster (post mahone) saying times change. This video was from decades ago and little seems to have changed.
 
It’s not just music when there is a huge $$ sign attached to it. And there is a long history of artists screwing over black people. I was also mostly responding to your and some other poster (post mahone) saying times change. This video was from decades ago and little seems to have changed.

When it comes to screwing artists over I feel differently. That's wrong. Cultural appropriation though I don't see as an issue in itself...unless like you say it is used primarily as a way to screw black people over.
 
When it comes to screwing artists over I feel differently. That's wrong. Cultural appropriation though I don't see as an issue in itself...unless like you say it is used primarily as a way to screw black people over.
Cultural appropriation doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Rachel Dolezal is still out here making money, publishing books etc. The same way Post Malone is making music covered in dreds and tattoos. IMO, it rarely doesn’t involve screwing other people over.
 
Cultural appropriation doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Rachel Dolezal is still out here making money, publishing books etc. The same way Post Malone is making music covered in dreds and tattoos. IMO, it rarely doesn’t involve screwing other people over.

I guess I just see it a bit differently. Culture changes and borrows aspects from others all of the time - I think there's probably more focus on this particular aspect of it because of the history of racism towards black people.