Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
You don't just give someone a position. However he's done enough to make spending £80m+ or so on another striker a foolish decision.
To put it simply. With Martial as our main striker I don't think we will be in a position to win a league or CL. He is not consistent enough. For every goal scored there are to much opportunities he missed, runs he didn't take, dribbles he got dispossessed. Good but not good enough. Not elite and don't think he will get there due to his mentality. If you had a chance to swap him for Aguero or Kane would you do it?On what planet is he a luxury? The guy scored winners against Man City, home and and away as well as a winner at Stamford Bridge and plenty of other important goals, if he’s a luxury player he’s certainly a necessary luxury.
He’d have to improve his consistency to be considered a top striker, I agree. I do object to calling him a luxury player though, it just seems a weird way to describe a player that regularly scores important, match winning goals for us.To put it simply. With Martial as our main striker I don't think we will be in a position to win a league or CL. He is not consistent enough. For every goal scored there are to much opportunities he missed, runs he didn't take, dribbles he got dispossessed. Good but not good enough. Not elite and don't think he will get there due to his mentality. If you had a chance to swap him for Aguero or Kane would you do it?
Very accurate.You don't just give someone a position. However he's done enough to make spending £80m+ or so on another striker a foolish decision.
Him and Greenwood competing against each other for the CF spot has us sorted for a long time.
No. Ole has done well to get a tune out of Tony who tends to be a frustrating player although clearly talented.
It’s my opinion and hope that Greenwood will show us he is a level above Martial once he’s a regular in the team.
I don’t want to get rid of Martial but he doesn’t deserve a ‘long term position’ and nobody does for that matter.
The amount of silly people here... These are the ones who trashed Rashford.
This. It's only his second half season at nr. 9 and already showed a lot of improvement over previous seasons. Hard to find a more talented footballer then him tbh. Full on Martial FC here.He's improving. Jose butchered his confidence which takes time to repair. He's earned the right to start for another season.
Martial is far more complete of a player than Chicarito ever was. Comparing them is not even viable. Chicartito could only play as a poacher while martial can play as a number 9, false 9, inside forward. He will always be useful across the board even if he somehow manages to fail as our leading striker which I highly doubt in my opinion.Of course it's nice to see Martial improve his goal tallies, and I'm glad that he's moving towards the right direction.
However it's also undeniable that he's deficient in some areas, which are important in modern football. His (lack of) center forward play is one of the reasons why we struggle to break down smaller teams, and his consistency is still a debate. When other top strikers are in bad form, they can still create chances and spaces for their teammates; but when Martial is having a bad day, it's like we are playing with a man down.
Having said that, I don't think it's urgent for us to sign a striker, especially with Ighalo as a reliable backup. But if Martial can't improve on his off-the-ball play, we have to reconsider our choices. Chicharito was a potent goalscoring poacher but he was poor in other areas and failed, I'm reluctant to see Martial follow his path.
I’m very curious who these 8/9 teams with at least a striker you would take over him are? Care to list them? In the meantime I would only take Aguero, Aubameyang and Kane over martial. I’d make a case for Jiminez but he is a different option to what martial offers. Those 3 are the only strikers I feel are clearly better than Martial. Aguero and Aubayeng are ageing so it’s really only Kane that would be viable.Agreed! When I look through the league about 8/9 teams have at least one striker I'd take before Martial.
I'd bring in someone like Aubameyang if he's available. That gives Greenwood a few years to really learn his trade without putting too much pressure on him while he's too young. I mean Greenwood is 18, he shouldn't have to even think about being number 1 for 3/4 years.
There most certainly are not 8/9 teams with a better strikerI’m very curious who these 8/9 teams with at least a striker you would take over him are? Care to list them? In the meantime I would only take Aguero, Aubameyang and Kane over martial. I’d make a case for Jiminez but he is a different option to what martial offers. Those 3 are the only strikers I feel are clearly better than Martial. Aguero and Aubayeng are ageing so it’s really only Kane that would be viable.
Just thought I would also throw in I wouldn’t take Vardy over martial.
Agreed. I'm just quoting Chicharito just to state that goalscoring alone doesn't make a good striker. Despite Martial is much more complete than Chicharito, he still lacks certain elements to improve his centre forward play and become a leading forward. He'll have all the time he needs to improve, but if he fails to fulfill his potential, we may need to reconsider our options by then.Martial is far more complete of a player than Chicarito ever was. Comparing them is not even viable. Chicartito could only play as a poacher while martial can play as a number 9, false 9, inside forward. He will always be useful across the board even if he somehow manages to fail as our leading striker which I highly doubt in my opinion.
Fair enough.I think people rightly pointed out that Rashford is a terrible CF, something which was confirmed beyond any doubt earlier this season.
Getting back on topic, it seems clear to me that both Rashford and Martial are better on the left than they are as CFs. You might argue from a goals/assists perspective, Rashford is slightly better as an AML than Martial
However, it also seems clear to me that Martial is a much better CF than Rashford. Therefore, for now, it makes sense to play Rashford AML and Martial as the CF.
Addressing the question in the OP - no I don't think Martial has 'done enough' to be backed as our 'long term' CF. I think at best he has proven that he MIGHT be the answer (as opposed to Rashford who has conclusively ruled himself out)
No. Not enough of a problem that we're desperate, but if another decent number 9 came along I don't think Marital could complain about being benched. Martial is becoming a moments player. He has a couple of good moments per game that can get him a goal or an assist, so he still contributes something, but he doesn't dictate or influence games the way we need a striker to. The best strikers go out and there and trouble defenders non-stop all game. Martial, even when he sores, is usually quiet for most of the actual match and he can often completely missing for 30 or 40 minutes at a time. That's not the required level.
I'll quote you on thatA million percent yes. His record vs the top teams speaks for itself, yet he is an unselfish player who is the glue that knits our attack together.
I have zero doubt that Martial will be regarded as one of the best forwards in the world in a few years & we're lucky to have him.
That's exactly what the best players do.. they impact games when they need to. When you have the likes of James, Lingard and Pereira playing in behind you, it is hard to influence games for large parts.
When we saw him with Rashford, Bruno, he seemed alot more influential.
A million percent yes. His record vs the top teams speaks for itself, yet he is an unselfish player who is the glue that knits our attack together.
I have zero doubt that Martial will be regarded as one of the best forwards in the world in a few years & we're lucky to have him.
Yeah but Martial isn't impacting games when we need him to, that's my whole point. The best players impact games by offering something more than just goals. Unless you have a genuine goal a game striker on your hands, a striker has to contribute at least as much to your overall play as to your goal tally. Martial simply doesn't.
You will hardly get a game a goal striker in the PL.
If you compare Martial to the teams around us, he is doing ok. I think he has showed we can give him another season as our No.9. Replacing him will be pointless unless we get a World class CF. We would rather focus on bringing in a RW and CM to compliment him.
He works well with Rashford, and forming partnerships with Bruno.
I do see where you are coming from, but I would be willing to give him benefit of one full season.
As I said at the outset, we're not desperate to replace him. However I think the one more season thing is a bit unrealistic, since his limitations are the same ones he's had since he arrived. It was fine for a teenager in his first full season to be in and out of games, but its continued with different managers and in different positions over 5 seasons now. I dont see any major difference in his tendency to disappear in games up front compared to when he was primarily on the wing. And that's because I dont think its a technical or positional problem, its a question of application and attitude.
Are they or are you making sweeping generalizations based on people not rating a player as highly as you do?The amount of silly people here... These are the ones who trashed Rashford.