Harry Maguire | Signed

Status
Not open for further replies.
This proposed transfer isn’t so much about improving us, which it Weill do, but also weakening Leicester as they have a real chance of finishing higher than us next season.

It’s basically doing what city did when they first won the blood money lottery, weaken your nearest rivals and build from there.


Leicester could easily replace him with all the money it takes to sign him, and get another quality player on top of that.

Spurs were "weakened" by selling their players, Liverpool too. Look where they are because they invested that money in the right players
 
Leicester could easily replace him with all the money it takes to sign him, and get another quality player on top of that.

Spurs were "weakened" by selling their players, Liverpool too. Look where they are because they invested that money in the right players
Fans don't seem to understand we've giving our current rival Leicester City £90m for a player worth half that. HTF did Leicester City become our rival? - smart transfer dealings opposed to United's dumb dealings.
 
When they want to sign a player, fans and managers seem to overlook the player's weaknesses. For example: No one complained that Lukaku had bad first touch before we signed him. Now I'm told that PL's 14th slowest player is faster than any of our CBs! Not because people are malicious. Because we set our hearts on something and can't be persuaded by facts. Everyone's like that. That's why you need to look at player stats rather than go on impressions and gut feeling.
 
From 3 years ago at United:
1. Eric Bailly – 21.65mph
7. Chris Smalling – 20.57mph

Maguire - 18.6mph, 14th slowest PL player!

Top speed is totally irrelevant in terms of defence, positioning, reading the game, reactions and acceleration trumps top straight line speed. I mean how many goals a season do you see from a players simply beating an individual defender for pace?
 
Jones is better than Bailly and Rojo so not sure why we'd be happy to keep them as part of the rotation if we're getting rid of him. Don't get me wrong, I want all three sold, but Jones has far outperformed the other two for the last two seasons.
Jones is not better than Bailly.
 
Only fear would be getting a player thar doesn't actually want to be here
I agree, but its infuriating seeing teams like Inter offer us either a terrible £9m 2 year loan deal for a player who should be £80+m in this market, or in Juve's case offering up any of a number of their cast offs whom they no longer want. These clubs should have to pay up like we always do.
 
Top speed is totally irrelevant in terms of defence, positioning, reading the game, reactions and acceleration trumps top straight line speed. I mean how many goals a season do you see from a players simply beating an individual defender for pace?
Why don't you do your own research?

I just corrected misinformation about Maguire being faster than any United CB except Jones. Reality is he's slower than any of them. If speed is worth next to nothing to a CB, why was Rio's speed so highly praised? Why are fast strikers a 'thing', if their speed get's them hardly any goals?
 
This is my first post. I've been reading this forum for more than 15 years. It's a lot fun, helpful information, different opinions. Transfer discussions are so heated:))) In transfer forums we mostly concentrate on a player in question per se, not the part of the team. I suggest a different approach, what if we list commonly recognized attributes and try to guess what is Ole's plan here?
Maguire: is tall, good at heading, long range passing, bringing ball out of the defense, not prone to lapses of concentration. He is slow in terms of acceleration and agility. 194 cm, 100 kg guy cannot accelerate as fast as 185 cm, 79 kg guy. It's just physics. Given that we are heavily linked to him, we can assume that Ole needs a CB with attributes Maguire has. So, we can make a relatively safe bet on what his back 4 would look like. Shaw, Maguire, Lindelof, AWB. Fast defensive fullbacks, two CBs with license to carry ball. Very good setup against top 6. If we play Fred at DM (his role at Shakhtar where he was very, very good), we can deal with pressing machines like Spurs and Liverpool. Fast strikers: Rashford, Martial or Lukaku. Lingard on the top of the diamond. Pogba on the left and McT on the right. We will play low defensive line, counter and use set pieces. Mourinho couldn't implement this plan because his defense was short and shaky. Remember his words about Fred? With short CBs, Young as fullback and short Fred as DM we would be destroyed. It's just one of our options.
Against middle and bottom we might play 4-3-3 with high defensive line. Either Shaw or AWB will have to stay back if Maguire proves to be a problem against really fast opposition strikers. AWB and Shaw will get additional training hours for attacking skills. If Ole play James as wide winger (it's not impossible against lesser teams) then AWB will stay back most of the time and we mostly use left side: Pogba, Martial, Shaw. Right side creativity will be slightly enhanced if we use Fred as right CM with Matic as DM. This doesn't solve right flank problem entirely but we'll have a good option. We will also continue to use McT, Mata, Dalot combo (used to be Young, but I hope he's finished). Ole likes to be flexible and use different setups and different players against different opponents. We also will leak less goals at set pieces. Generally, the defense will be a lot more stable. I'm not trying to predict the formation, formation is a formal thing. We can call same formation 4-5-1, 4-4-1, 4-2-3-1 all in one game in different spells.
Next window we will start improving offense.
Maguire is answer to a lot of problems we have now. All of us want United to become a Klopps' Red Machine, Poch's Exicitng Young Spurs or Pep's Domintaor. We envy them, and we hate them. But we are United, we have our own business, and we are where we are. Let's think what can we do to improve that now. Ole's is not stupid and he has a plan. If Maguire is key to his plan, I don't care if we pay 70 or 90 or 150. And yes, I am biased and subjective, as any of us:))))
 
Last edited:
Jones is not better than Bailly.

Over the last 2 seasons he probably has been. People are far too forgiving towards Bailly. He had 1 good season when he 1st joined and has been terrible since then.
 
Over the last 2 seasons he probably has been. People are far too forgiving towards Bailly. He had 1 good season when he 1st joined and has been terrible since then.
Jones is an absolute calamity and has cost us more times than Young in my opinion. He's the one player in our squad that I cannot wait to leave.

He's been making these howlers for the last 7 years as well. Bailly has struggled for consistency due to injury, he has far better attributes than Jones.
 
Why don't you do your own research?

I just corrected misinformation about Maguire being faster than any United CB except Jones. Reality is he's slower than any of them. If speed is worth next to nothing to a CB, why was Rio's speed so highly praised? Why are fast strikers a 'thing', if their speed get's them hardly any goals?

I was simply having a discussion, I wasn't getting at your post simply adding my thoughts, no need to be so salty about it. Its another string to the defenders bow, King had lightening pace and it allows defenders to catch a striker who had gotten beyond him or another team mate ideally you don't want to let a striker get beyond you though. Its not just fast players that are a "thing", you need to have a brain and technical ability, some of the fastest players in the PL are average, Traore, Yedlin, VanArnult, Sissoko etc are average to poor players.
 
Jones is an absolute calamity and has cost us more times than Young in my opinion. He's the one player in our squad that I cannot wait to leave.

He's been making these howlers for the last 7 years as well. Bailly has struggled for consistency due to injury, he has far better attributes than Jones.

Disagree completly.

They both have horrendous mistakes on them. But Jones has actually shown he’s capable of decent runs of form - Bailly hasn’t, he’s a CB who can’t even head the ball properly. He’s got pace and strength, but doesn’t seem to be able to use it effectively, he has no tactical awareness. He’s the sort of player that I’m sure stood out against players of a similar age group, but he’s just not progressed at all.

We are not in a position to keep trying to tap into his ‘potential’, given he’s been here 3 years and our CB options are poor. Can’t see why OGS would ever play him to be honest, I’d play Tuanzebe ahead of him every day of the week.
 
Leicester could easily replace him with all the money it takes to sign him, and get another quality player on top of that.

Spurs were "weakened" by selling their players, Liverpool too. Look where they are because they invested that money in the right players

That's the thing that annoys me about our approach... we spend an absurd amount on Maguire when really, we should be signing that player that Leicester will probably sign to replace him and will be even better.
 
If Juve manage to get DeLigt for 50m and we end up getting Maguire for 80 :lol:

I like Maguire, but comparing the sort of fees we pay vs Barca/Juve is just depressing

DeLigt does not want to go to United. Why is that difficult to understand? :confused:
 
This is my first post. I've been reading this forum for more than 15 years. It's a lot fun, helpful information, different opinions. Transfer discussions are so heated:))) In transfer forums we mostly concentrate on a player in question per se, not the part of the team. I suggest a different approach, what if we list commonly recognized attributes and try to guess what is Ole's plan here?
Maguire: is tall, good at heading, long range passing, bringing ball out of the defense, not prone to lapses of concentration. He is slow in terms of acceleration and agility. 194 cm, 100 kg guy cannot accelerate as fast as 185 cm, 79 kg guy. It's just physics. Given that we are heavily linked to him, we can assume that Ole needs a CB with attributes Maguire has. So, we can make a relatively safe bet on what his back 4 would look like. Shaw, Maguire, Lindelof, AWB. Fast defensive fullbacks, two CBs with license to carry ball. Very good setup against top 6. If we play Fred at DM (his role at Shakhtar where he was very, very good), we can deal with pressing machines like Spurs and Liverpool. Fast strikers: Rashford, Martial or Lukaku. Lingard on the top of the diamond. Pogba on the left and McT on the right. We will play low defensive line, counter and use set pieces. Mourinho couldn't implement this plan because his defense was short and shaky. Remember his words about Fred? With short CBs, Young as fullback and short Fred as DM we would be destroyed. It's just one of our options.
Against middle and bottom we might play 4-3-3 with high defensive line. Either Shaw or AWB will have to stay back if Maguire proves to be a problem against really fast opposition strikers. AWB and Shaw will get additional training hours for attacking skills. If Ole play James as wide winger (it's not impossible against lesser teams) then AWB will stay back most of the time and we mostly use left side: Pogba, Martial, Shaw. Right side creativity will be slightly enhanced if we use Fred as right CM with Matic as DM. This doesn't solve right flank problem entirely but we'll have a good option. We will also continue to use McT, Mata, Dalot combo (used to be Young, but I hope he's finished). Ole likes to be flexible and use different setups and different players against different opponents. We also will leak less goals at set pieces. Generally, the defense will be a lot more stable. I'm not trying to predict the formation, formation is a formal thing. We can call same formation 4-5-1, 4-4-1, 4-2-3-1 all in one game in different spells.
Next window we will start improving offense.
Maguire is answer to a lot of problems we have now. All of us want United to become a Klopps' Red Machine, Poch's Exicitng Young Spurs or Pep's Domintaor. We envy them, and we hate them. But we are United, we have our own business, and we are where we are. Let's think what can we do to improve that now. Ole's is not stupid and he has a plan. If Maguire is key to his plan, I don't care if we pay 70 or 90 or 150. And yes, I am biased and subjective, as any of us:))))
Welcome to the Cafe.
Liked your first post and looking forward to more of such healthy discussions :)
 
My West Ham mates don't rate him particularly, and said they would have gladly sold him for a £40m offer..!
First impressions. I watched his first few games. I can understand why they'd feel that way.
 
Over the last 2 seasons he probably has been. People are far too forgiving towards Bailly. He had 1 good season when he 1st joined and has been terrible since then.

I have played zero times for United and Jones has never played better than me .
 
This is my first post. I've been reading this forum for more than 15 years. It's a lot fun, helpful information, different opinions. Transfer discussions are so heated:))) In transfer forums we mostly concentrate on a player in question per se, not the part of the team. I suggest a different approach, what if we list commonly recognized attributes and try to guess what is Ole's plan here?
Maguire: is tall, good at heading, long range passing, bringing ball out of the defense, not prone to lapses of concentration. He is slow in terms of acceleration and agility. 194 cm, 100 kg guy cannot accelerate as fast as 185 cm, 79 kg guy. It's just physics. Given that we are heavily linked to him, we can assume that Ole needs a CB with attributes Maguire has. So, we can make a relatively safe bet on what his back 4 would look like. Shaw, Maguire, Lindelof, AWB. Fast defensive fullbacks, two CBs with license to carry ball. Very good setup against top 6. If we play Fred at DM (his role at Shakhtar where he was very, very good), we can deal with pressing machines like Spurs and Liverpool. Fast strikers: Rashford, Martial or Lukaku. Lingard on the top of the diamond. Pogba on the left and McT on the right. We will play low defensive line, counter and use set pieces. Mourinho couldn't implement this plan because his defense was short and shaky. Remember his words about Fred? With short CBs, Young as fullback and short Fred as DM we would be destroyed. It's just one of our options.
Against middle and bottom we might play 4-3-3 with high defensive line. Either Shaw or AWB will have to stay back if Maguire proves to be a problem against really fast opposition strikers. AWB and Shaw will get additional training hours for attacking skills. If Ole play James as wide winger (it's not impossible against lesser teams) then AWB will stay back most of the time and we mostly use left side: Pogba, Martial, Shaw. Right side creativity will be slightly enhanced if we use Fred as right CM with Matic as DM. This doesn't solve right flank problem entirely but we'll have a good option. We will also continue to use McT, Mata, Dalot combo (used to be Young, but I hope he's finished). Ole likes to be flexible and use different setups and different players against different opponents. We also will leak less goals at set pieces. Generally, the defense will be a lot more stable. I'm not trying to predict the formation, formation is a formal thing. We can call same formation 4-5-1, 4-4-1, 4-2-3-1 all in one game in different spells.
Next window we will start improving offense.
Maguire is answer to a lot of problems we have now. All of us want United to become a Klopps' Red Machine, Poch's Exicitng Young Spurs or Pep's Domintaor. We envy them, and we hate them. But we are United, we have our own business, and we are where we are. Let's think what can we do to improve that now. Ole's is not stupid and he has a plan. If Maguire is key to his plan, I don't care if we pay 70 or 90 or 150. And yes, I am biased and subjective, as any of us:))))


great first post!
 
I was about to make a post stating that if we did throw a huge fee at Maguire, it would be offset with the sale of any of Jones, Bailly or Rojo.....however...
I've just read that Rojo has a clause in his £160k per week contract, that we cannot sell him for another 2 years..!!
Can this be true..???

If it is true, do the likes of Smalling & Jones & Young have the same clause..???:eek:
 
I like magurie just do not think we shall spend insane money on him. We need to get the quality level above him and buy attacking players for mega money.
 
From 3 years ago at United:
1. Eric Bailly – 21.65mph
7. Chris Smalling – 20.57mph

Maguire - 18.6mph, 14th slowest PL player!

Well there you go you're refering to 3 year old stats. this is what was posted earlier in the thread

IMG-0479.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jones is an absolute calamity and has cost us more times than Young in my opinion. He's the one player in our squad that I cannot wait to leave.

He's been making these howlers for the last 7 years as well. Bailly has struggled for consistency due to injury, he has far better attributes than Jones.

I wouldn't be sad to see both go frankly. I don't like any of our cbs (Lindelof is probably the least bad)
 
I’m bemused how many apologists Bailly still has on here. It was the same last summer, and he had yet another tumescent season that was one to forget, which is basically the norm for him.
 
"Top Speed" is not the most important stat. It´s more about how fast someone is speeding up. Defenders like van Buyten and Badstuber also had a high "Top Speed", but started their runs like trucks.
 
Why don't you do your own research?

I just corrected misinformation about Maguire being faster than any United CB except Jones. Reality is he's slower than any of them. If speed is worth next to nothing to a CB, why was Rio's speed so highly praised? Why are fast strikers a 'thing', if their speed get's them hardly any goals?
What a shite response to valid question AND your stats are outdated.
 
"Top Speed" is not the most important stat. It´s more about how fast someone is speeding up. Defenders like van Buyten and Badstuber also had a high "Top Speed", but started their runs like trucks.

Yup - Gary Pallister was our quickest player with a flying start - when we had Kanchelskis in the side
 
Disagree completly.

They both have horrendous mistakes on them. But Jones has actually shown he’s capable of decent runs of form - Bailly hasn’t, he’s a CB who can’t even head the ball properly. He’s got pace and strength, but doesn’t seem to be able to use it effectively, he has no tactical awareness. He’s the sort of player that I’m sure stood out against players of a similar age group, but he’s just not progressed at all.

We are not in a position to keep trying to tap into his ‘potential’, given he’s been here 3 years and our CB options are poor. Can’t see why OGS would ever play him to be honest, I’d play Tuanzebe ahead of him every day of the week.
The biggest problem with Jones it that whilst he's here he is going to start a lot of games. I'd much rather have Bailly as a squad option although he is rash at times. As for decent runs I'm pretty sure Bailly was very good in his first and most of his second season, far longer than jones has ever managed.

and what potential does jones have? hes been here for nearly a decade and has continuously embarassed us. I don't want even one more season of that, he's a buffoon at the back.
 
Some of our fans deserve forus to spend £80m on him.

world record fee for second rate goods.
 
If unproven Awb is worth 50 mill after one decent season then world cup semi finalist and premier league stalwart Maguire is worth a fair bit more. For what its worth we are probably being fleeced for both but Maguire is the more expensive player.
 
I’m bemused how many apologists Bailly still has on here. It was the same last summer, and he had yet another tumescent season that was one to forget, which is basically the norm for him.

I didn't mind it that much last season because he had done well the season prior and had a bad injury so I thought he might just need some time to recover but this season clearly showed he's just not good enough. He somehow managed to look worse than Jones and Smalling whenever he played. He made so many mistakes and just looked generally dreadful. People seem to overlook these conveniently when they're made by a player they like
 
If Juve manage to get DeLigt for 50m and we end up getting Maguire for 80 :lol:

I like Maguire, but comparing the sort of fees we pay vs Barca/Juve is just depressing

Didn't barca spend 250m on coutinho and dembele? Another 120 coming on Griezmann who may or may not work. They're not bargain hunting. 25m on constant Injury worry umtiti.

If Juve get de Ligt for that fair play to them but it's irrelevant to us if he doesn't want to join a europa league club.

We've overpaid for many players, but so do lots of clubs. Our main problem has been absolutely no structure or policy to who we sign. I'll overpay for the correct players any day, accepting that even then some might just not work
 
This is my first post. I've been reading this forum for more than 15 years. It's a lot fun, helpful information, different opinions. Transfer discussions are so heated:))) In transfer forums we mostly concentrate on a player in question per se, not the part of the team. I suggest a different approach, what if we list commonly recognized attributes and try to guess what is Ole's plan here?
Maguire: is tall, good at heading, long range passing, bringing ball out of the defense, not prone to lapses of concentration. He is slow in terms of acceleration and agility. 194 cm, 100 kg guy cannot accelerate as fast as 185 cm, 79 kg guy. It's just physics.

That Usain Bolt fellow seems like his acceleration isnt too bad, hes 195cm - 94kg.

Is Bailly still in the picture? Being sold? We need to at least trim our CB's down a little if we are looking to bring in Maguire. Lindelof, Jones, Smalling, Bailly, Rojo, Darmian, Tuanzebe, with Maguire we have 8CB's. We planning on playing a 6-2-2? It's time to do a clear out.
 
If unproven Awb is worth 50 mill after one decent season then world cup semi finalist and premier league stalwart Maguire is worth a fair bit more. For what its worth we are probably being fleeced for both but Maguire is the more expensive player.

AWB was the best defensive full back in the league last season and is only 21. Maguire had a pretty poor season and made a lot of mistakes. England don't have the best cbs anyway so not that big of an accomplishment. Michael Keane has a good number of caps for England too. There are better cbs in Europe but we seem set on getting our cb from the Premier League for some reason. I don't think any cb outside the top 6 is good enough to improve us significantly frankly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.