finneh
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 7,319
The problem we have is this, he'll no doubt command a fee of at least 60m (probably a lot more) and at a time when De Ligt is seemingly moving for 65m do we really want to pay a similar fee for an inferior player? If you dont like the De Ligt comparison another way of looking at it would be paying VVD money for an inferior player.
I dont doubt Maguire would improve our defence but this paying top money for only good players surely has to stop?
I'm of the opinion that unless we can get the best we should give Tuanzebe a chance. Next season is already a write off in terms of any challenging for anything so what do we have to loose?
The difference will be in salaries. De Ligt is playing the top teams against each other and would command maybe £13m per year. McGuire on the other hand would probably command £7m per year.
I'm not sold on McGuire though as I can't see him forming a good partnership with Lindelof. I think they have similar strengths and similar weaknesses and we'll end up with a situation similar to England whereby we sacrifice a lot of defensive solidarity for this mythical "ball playing" defence. City get away with this because their opposition rarely have the ball (plus Fernandinho), but United aren't going to have that luxury. Alderweireld is a better option in my book as whilst being good with the ball at his feet he's a far, far more solid defender. He's also more experienced which I think with the timid De Gea and young players like Shaw/Lindelof and potentially Wan-Bassaka he'd be a better fit.