- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Messages
- 200
Cut to the chase just go straight for Dunk now instead of trying to buy him in 2 years for £100m!
Were you saying the same when we bought Ferdinand for nearly £30m in 2002. People even had their doubts about him back then too.
English, PL proven, decent age you are always going to have to pay that bit more.
Maguire is 26 years old. AWB is 21. If you can't see the difference in "potential" when it comes to age and footballers then you should probably look it up.
The bolded part. Many don't think he's one of the best CB's in the league. He's probably top ten, but that's not exactly huge praise given the lack of quality CB's outside of City and Pool's squads right now.
AWB is a potentially world-class right back, and he's only 21. It's a riskier signing than Maguire but one that could pay far more dividends if it works out. Maguire is 26 and hasn't really shown anything in his career so far to suggest he could reach the level AWB potentially can, that's the difference.
I only see very few posters on here who don't rate Maguire, pretty much everyone agrees that he's better than what we have, but some think he's not that much better (me included) and some think he's far better (you, I guess). Maybe the truth lies some in the middle but if you think the former I see nothing wrong with being uncomfortable at such a monstrous fee.
Personally I don't really care about the fee, it's better than the club not spending money, I just don't think Maguire will have enough of an impact on our defense to ever justify it.
Why didn't we sign Maguire in 2017?
There's plenty of players who fit that description. Defensively its arguable he doesnt fit it himself
I get the impression we'll play either Lindelof or Smalling depending on the opposition. Lindelof being comfortable in possession and being able to carry the ball out from the back is useful when we're playing against teams we need to be dominating and require possession, but also against teams who press us. Smalling being a better out and out defender would be useful against some of the stronger teams with pacy attackers, plus his heading ability is still very good, his physicality is an asset against certain teams who employ target men.Maguire's deal will end Smalling's career as a first teamer
I very much doubt it. Maguire, Lindelof and Matic trio might be physically imposing and comfortable to the ball but its also very very slow. AWB and Shaw would surely help out but any intelligent striker with pace can avoid those two and exploit the lack of pace in the middle of the pitch. Hence I believe that if Maguire does sign with us then Smalling will play a central role in our defence.
Why didn't we sign Maguire in 2017?
In my opinion people who make this comment are underestimating the level of progression Maguire had at Leicester. If you have a look at the stats, Hull had the worst EPL defence in 2016-2017 leaking a staggering 80 goals in a season. Maguire moved to Leicester the year after and was part of the 5th worst defence in the EPL. Its only this year that the situation had improved and Leicester's defence had leaked just 48 goals which puts them ahead of us and Arsenal. I am not completely sold about the guy but one presumes that the Maguire we will buying is certainly way better then the one who signed with Leicester.
What about the more pertinent - why didn't we sign him last Summer, when our manager wanted him and we had just finished 2nd...?
Woodward literally vetoed the manager over this guy, and is now breaking the transfer record to sign him...!
Colin this has been dealt with numberous times in this thread already.Some are saying it isn't even on now.
The Sun says yes, Simon Stone (BBC) says no. I don't believe either, but I'm more inclined to go with the BBC.
Colin this has been dealt with numberous times in this thread already.
Stone has said with both James and AWB that "It's not happening" only to change his mind practically in an instance. What he says isn't important unless he's fed it directly.
I get the impression we'll play either Lindelof or Smalling depending on the opposition. Lindelof being comfortable in possession and being able to carry the ball out from the back is useful when we're playing against teams we need to be dominating and require possession, but also against teams who press us. Smalling being a better out and out defender would be useful against some of the stronger teams with pacy attackers, plus his heading ability is still very good, his physicality is an asset against certain teams who employ target men.
To be honest, I still think there's more to come from Lindelof. I thought he was good last season but there's still room for improvement.
Sorry for not reading all 5489 posts.
Could you be more specific in terms of players' names? A couple of obvious choices (de Ligt and Koulibaly) are even more expensive so they don't count in this regard.
That's just not true . Ferdinand had alot to prove when he came to United and for that huge fee at the time . He had some rocky moments in a Leeds shirt . Both the fee and him as a player where questioned ..
Just the last few pages will do!Sorry for not reading all 5489 posts.
Sorry for not reading all 5489 posts.
The whole thread is basically people repeating the same posts.
He aint worth 80m
He improves the team though
Why didn't we buy last year
Is xxxx (stone,simon etc) reliable.
Maybe people could stick to something new so every pop in here isn't sifting through 3 pages of the above
I wasn't disagreeing with you, I think you're right about Smalling. Signing a mobile DM sounds like too much sense for us then again we were supposedly after Longstaff so maybe we're still looking for one.I am not saying that Lindelof won't be given a chance and my theory kind of goes tits up if United ends up buying a mobile DM WHICH WE DESPERATELY NEED. My point is that its very wrong to count Smalling out. He's got the right characteristics to thrive alongside Maguire.
Not on here, as the thread showed
Sorry for not reading all 5489 posts.
Utd have to ask themselevs why they never spotted the guy when he was at Hull.
Paying 80million for a poor man's John Stones seems absurd. Surley there must be someone of equal or not greater quality, who does not have the 'English tax' added to their value?
Schar, Izzo, Maripan, Velazquez although he only played 13 matches. Schar is the only one I'd say thats also particularly good on the ball like Maguire, but in terms of defending the others are better than Maguire.
You're forgiven but don't do it again.
Can see this dragging on another couple of days while Leicester sort out a replacement first. I don’t think he will be coming in today for a medical though until the fee is officially agreed
I don't think he's way better though. AWB was in the top five fullbacks in the league last season, Maguire probably was too.your argument is nonsense because Maguire is already way better than AWB. if AWB fulfills his potential, he may well match Maguire's current status.
Not many people even heard some of these names. It's not the level of defenders we need at Manchester United - what we need are players who are much, much better than this.
Not only that, but we really should have signed him when he was at Hull. It seemed like an obvious one at the time.
Also funny that Ed didnt wanna get him last season for about 30m cheaper cos he wasnt any better than what we have, but will not potentially break a record to get him a year later (without his price being boosted by any tournaments).
I don't disagree with any of that. Maguire is probably our best option at the moment but his fee is nuts which doesn't exactly help matters. I don't rate him remotely as highly as some on here seem to but he'd instantly be our best defender which still counts for something. That's what I said in my original post.He is the best CB outside the top 4 with ease. The issue is find a better CB between 24-29 that is available, not just in the league, but across Europe. You wont find many. We can sign an older one, we can sign a younger one, but we dont really need another young CB or an old crock that we need to upgrade in 2 years time again.
If you look outside of classy ones llike Koulibaly and De Ligt, one which isnt available due to ridiculous prices and the other due to being too good for us at the moment, thats a problem. There are plenty of talented young ones floating around, between the age of 20-23, but i dont think thats really what we are looking for when we got Tuanzebe and Lindelöf himself is still young enough. We can add one like that once we get rid of one of the other ones (Jones, Smalling, Rojo or Bailly)
We need to improve the CB position and Maguire has some advantages over other players. The only ones i would take over him with the requirements are Gimenez, Skriniar and Romagnoli, but question marks if they are available or really keen to move here when they probably could get better moves at some point or stay where they are for now. To me Maguire adds the quality that he wont move to another league in a few years or needs any sort of adaptation to the league or country. He comes in and starts immediately without any sort of fuss or 'give him a season or two to get to know the league/pace', besides being a good defender and what we need on the ball/in the air
Do people realise that a club the size of Manchester United can't go around taking punts on certain players in the same way that Leicester can?
You also have to factor in that he probably wouldn't have developed in the same way at United than he has at Leicester. The game time he has been afforded has helped him to come on leaps and bounds.
Shaw is OK- nothing more and nothing less. He's also already injured in pre season with a hamstring issues what is going to happen if he get injured during the season? There's a long season coming up with potential 50 games why shouldn't we search for competition? Tierny is available for like 25m-30m and better than all these makeshift options you listed. We should have at least two good players in every position , not players like Young and Darmian.There would be absolutely no point in trying to upgrade Shaw. He's perfectly fine as a LB and the money you'd have to spend to get an improvement would not be worth the level of investment when we have other areas to sort, unless you have some cheap suggestions that would represent an actual upgrade? Dalot, Young, Laird and Darmian (whilst he's still here) can all cover left back. Left back, for me, is a loooong way back in terms of positions that need upgrading.
He'd have been our best defender in the last two seasons easily. He'd have probably played more games for us than he did for Leicester.You also have to factor in that he probably wouldn't have developed in the same way at United than he has at Leicester. The game time he has been afforded has helped him to come on leaps and bounds.
I don't think its a luxury. Young needs to be fully ousted imo.I agree but with the issues to address a LB feels like a luxury signing this window. We can get by with Shaw/Dalot/Young. We wouldn’t have got by without a RB signing.
So The Sun report everyone seems to be taking as gospel said he will have his medical today.
So The Sun report everyone seems to be taking as gospel said he will have his medical today.