LilyWhiteSpur
New Member
Eriksen hasn't signed yet so there is every chance "he will be gone soon" hopefully to United.
Do you dream daily of people leaving Tottenham? Eriksen will sign a new contract along with Verts.
Eriksen hasn't signed yet so there is every chance "he will be gone soon" hopefully to United.
If they have a lick of sense they will wait until after the WC, especially Eriksen.
Do you dream daily of people leaving Tottenham? Eriksen will sign a new contract along with Verts.
With Kane it is understandable, a local boy coming through the ranks and now a top striker in his boyhood club. Vertonghen also is a good defender but not really someone the top clubs will be vying for or paying huge bucks too so if he extends at his age, it's not really a surprise.Why? Both have done enough to show what they are capable of, especially Eriksen.
With Kane it is understandable, a local boy coming through the ranks and now a top striker in his boyhood club. Vertonghen also is a good defender but not really someone the top clubs will be vying for or paying huge bucks too so if he extends at his age, it's not really a surprise.
Eriksen does not owe Spurs any such loyalty and he is one of the best players in his position. A lot of top teams would love to get him in. So if he wants to wait till after the WC it shouldn't really be a surprise. He may want to concentrate on his world cup before discussing with either Levy or any potential new team.
I am saying that he may alreasa be getting courted but is not discussing much since he is focused on his national team. Only time will tell. Though I get a feeling he will renew as well, but on massive wages similar to Kane.I don’t deny any of that, but what I’m saying is, if top teams genuinely though Eriksen could be persuaded to move they would have started the courtship by now. Eriksen is one of our players, who like Kane, Dele and Lloris are very connected to Poch, I don’t see him going anywhere this summer, WC or no WC. I doubt the likes of Poch or Kane would have committed so soon and for so long if they though Christian could be sold this summer.
Why? Both have done enough to show what they are capable of, especially Eriksen.
Spurs has to smash their budget. Their going no where if they don’t start paying these players at least relatively competitively.
They don’t have to pay the best, but they need to be in the range. This is an instance of this and I hope they do it more.
Spurs are great to watch and the more competitive the league is, the better.
Let's be honest, you're saying that possibly going off what no-nothings like TalkSport or Ian Wright broadcast. Spurs already had the 12th Highest wage bill in world football.
The "Spurs don't pay money" and "Have a wage budget" is media hogwash perpetuated by the need to try and attack a club for having good financial health.
New stadium = higher projected matchday income, thus a greater % of projected income is now available for wages. This is driven by a number of factors, not least STCC (which dictate the max percentage wage bill growth allowable per season).
It's all taken care of … so you don't need to worry.
I'm sure I'm not the only United fan that has wet dreams over Eriksen joining United. Right?
![]()
All this ensures for Kane is that he gets better wages for a season before leaving.
Great for Spuds/Levy, as when he moves next Summer they'll get a truly mega-fee.
But if he wants to win trophies of note (or at all), he has to move elsewhere, this has been proven now.
Spurs just aren't a club that win anything.
Unless he's happy competing for the Golden Boot every year and a top 4 finish - if that's the case, then he's at the right club.
All this ensures for Kane is that he gets better wages for a season before leaving.
Great for Spuds/Levy, as when he moves next Summer they'll get a truly mega-fee.
But if he wants to win trophies of note (or at all), he has to move elsewhere, this has been proven now.
Spurs just aren't a club that win anything.
Unless he's happy competing for the Golden Boot every year and a top 4 finish - if that's the case, then he's at the right club.
...or, y'know, based on researchable fact?Straight out of the Glaston playbook. Nice one.
This is an unnecessary post, and is just antoginistic. Be nice to have a middle ground between the over optimistic Spurs fans on here and those who want to bash them at every opportunity.
We all know there is no certainty in football, but this is nothing but great news for Spurs.
Let's be honest, you're saying that possibly going off what no-nothings like TalkSport or Ian Wright broadcast. Spurs already had the 12th Highest wage bill in world football.
The "Spurs don't pay money" and "Have a wage budget" is media hogwash perpetuated by the need to try and attack a club for having good financial health.
New stadium = higher projected matchday income, thus a greater % of projected income is now available for wages. This is driven by a number of factors, not least STCC (which dictate the max percentage wage bill growth allowable per season).
I don't get this part, are you implying that the media have an agenda against Spurs and they are actively attacking the club because they are financially secure?
Can you provide evidence to support this claim?
Let's be honest, you're saying that possibly going off what no-nothings like TalkSport or Ian Wright broadcast. Spurs already had the 12th Highest wage bill in world football.
The "Spurs don't pay money" and "Have a wage budget" is media hogwash perpetuated by the need to try and attack a club for having good financial health.
New stadium = higher projected matchday income, thus a greater % of projected income is now available for wages. This is driven by a number of factors, not least STCC (which dictate the max percentage wage bill growth allowable per season).
I don't get this part, are you implying that the media have an agenda against Spurs and they are actively attacking the club because they are financially secure?
Can you provide evidence to support this claim?
Your seriously saying the media aren’t trying to sell ours players, oh and more recently our manager saying “they can get what they are worth elsewhere”? Come on...
You mean literally every episode of match of the day, or the every-other-day mention of it in the papers and on Sky Sports etc. etc.
Let's be honest, you're saying that possibly going off what no-nothings like TalkSport or Ian Wright broadcast. Spurs already had the 12th Highest wage bill in world football.
The "Spurs don't pay money" and "Have a wage budget" is media hogwash perpetuated by the need to try and attack a club for having good financial health.
).
Stop hurting Kane and England's chances at the WC.Has great meme potential
...or, y'know, based on researchable fact?
I mean, we could all do an Arsenal and pay our crappest players £300k a week and then ponder where it all went wrong...?
That's textbook propaganda. Take a sprinkle of truth to create a wholesale lie. Spurs are the 12th richest, this doesn't mean they play their players the going rate (hint: a look at Spurs wage bill, as well as comparing salaries will tell this fact).
Kane's bumper new contract was the top rate for players 2-3 years ago. Lukaku is on the same basic, Pogba earns the same basic as Kane does after bonuses, De Bruyne's new contract blows Kane out of the water. Kane is Spurs talisman, and will be one of their top earners, yet there is a massive list of players that earn more than him.
Spurs are the 12th richest in the world, which means that they can't pay the rate for top players because there's several clubs that pay can outbid them. Kane would be paid considerably more at many other clubs, of course that's not important to him because he's a local player and wants to stay at Spurs long term, but it's the truth.
Stop hurting Kane and England's chances at the WC.
Wouldn’t argue with any of that to be honest.
It's why I like you mate. You don't try to paint Spurs to be something they aren't. You've got a good thing going, players believe in the project and want to see where they can go in it. If they don't get what they want, they move for one last contract elsewhere.
It happened with Walker (and Rose tried some funny business but it backfired), it's happening with Alderweireld and Dembele. It works for both Tottenham and the buying clubs. Spurs get 4-5 years from their players and sell for a profit. Buying clubs get a top player in to suit their team.
Coutinho signed a new deal last January, and wanted to leave 5 months later. Kane may indeed be dedicated to Spurs, but they mean little in the scheme of things these days.
He's set up nicely to be the next Alan Shearer then.
A top-class 30+ goal a season striker who won't win anything at club level but will probably break some individual records in the Premier League.
No, I responded to a claim that suggested the media were attacking Spurs because they are financially secure.
I've literally never heard anyone on MotD attack spurs because of their financial situation. Ever.