Lee565
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
- Messages
- 5,338
I cant figure our what would be worse scenario this summer, kane to city or messi to city?
I cant figure our what would be worse scenario this summer, kane to city or messi to city?
He's already said he doesn't fancy going abroad and wants to break Shearer's PL goal record. City maybe his favoured destination but its not his call. If City decide to pursue Joao Felix from athletico instead then that gives us some hope. Though city could just sign Felix and Kane and then the rest of the league have no chance.If he is leaving for trophies and not money, then he should choose City 100%. By the way, City could offer(at least match) the most money to him, too. So it is a no brainer for me. The only question is whether City's priority is him or Haaland/Felix.
If City don't want him, he could go to Barcelona/Real. So we are like the 4th choice for him I guess.
We're 4th choice even though Kane has said he doesn't want to go abroad? Makes sense.
We're 4th choice even though Kane has said he doesn't want to go abroad? Makes sense.
Seems a good source for them, broke the news that their ban would be reduced.Who the feck is Ian?
Havent seen todays Sunday Times then? Utd seem to be doing alot of ground work for the transfer. They wouldnt be doing that if glazers hadn't approved it.
Chelsea
Liverpool
Didn't Neville do exactly that when Raiola made noises about Pogba wanting to leave but was there ever any doubt that Neville is fecking Hypocrite.If Pogba did that, his haters will never let it go.
Neville would be on tv calling for him to be shot.
Kane's PR team gave Sky Sports the option for this interview because this transfer saga will be great for their output. Probably offered BT the same and the highest bidder won.It's quite hilarious really. I don't blame Kane for what he did because he wants out, there is little to play for and it's end of the season. But Gary Neville & SkySports were just in typical hypocritical form.
Kane is very lucky he's English and that SkySports were complicit. If this was Bruno Fernandes or Moh Salah etc. they'd be grilled for it.
Unthinkable.Obviously it would never happen as rashford would see spurs as beneath him but if it was possible, would anyone here swap rashford for kane?
Obviously it would never happen as rashford would see spurs as beneath him but if it was possible, would anyone here swap rashford for kane?
Ridiculous! There is no comparison between the two.If Pogba did that, his haters will never let it go.
Neville would be on tv calling for him to be shot.
Heck no. Rashford would want to move up the ladder not down and what are we going to gain with a swap like this ?Obviously it would never happen as rashford would see spurs as beneath him but if it was possible, would anyone here swap rashford for kane?
Are you fecking mad? I swear some of you would have sold Ronaldo after his first season. Jesus wept...Obviously it would never happen as rashford would see spurs as beneath him but if it was possible, would anyone here swap rashford for kane?
There were enough that said he was a one trick pony. Swear the number of match going idiots I spoke to. Came across as entitled knobs... nothing’s changedAre you fecking mad? I swear some of you would have sold Ronaldo after his first season. Jesus wept...
Surely you said this for the lolz
Well one or the other may not even be in the CL next season.Both clubs have a better chance of winning the league next season than we do (if he joins them).
Regardless of that, working for Tuchel or Klopp with better players is an easy sell too.
I’d love Kane here. But we’re not a bigger draw than either of those two clubs, for a 29 year old Centre Forward.
Both clubs have a better chance of winning the league next season than we do (if he joins them).
Regardless of that, working for Tuchel or Klopp with better players is an easy sell too.
I’d love Kane here. But we’re not a bigger draw than either of those two clubs, for a 29 year old Centre Forward.
Sign him at all costs. Clinical.
At the cost of us having no chance of winning the league because we signed a player in a position we didn't need instead of looking at positions we do need to strengthen?
At the cost of us having no chance of winning the league because we signed a player in a position we didn't need instead of looking at positions we do need to strengthen?
Controversial but would be unbelievable business. I can’t see Rashford ever hitting peak Kane form.Obviously it would never happen as rashford would see spurs as beneath him but if it was possible, would anyone here swap rashford for kane?
Kane would win us the league, we'd still have our issues but he'd mask them
No we wouldn't for one thing he would be injured around half the season and we need a defensive midfielder and a centre back way way way before a forward.
Rice, Sancho and Varane would make us a lot more likely to win the title than Kane
has he been injured for half this season?
Goals cure all problems. Kane is much more likely to win us the PL than 2 defensive players and a youngster.No we wouldn't for one thing he would be injured around half the season and we need a defensive midfielder and a centre back way way way before a forward.
Rice, Sancho and Varane would make us a lot more likely to win the title than Kane