As if we’ve got sad acts on here that wouldn’t sign this fella.
Just look at today for feck sake.
Just look at today for feck sake.
Harry Kane | Bayern Munich player
- Thread starter LawCharltonBest
- Start date
Surely there must be the financial capacity to borrow the 80m it would take right now, in the January window, to pry Harry loose from Daniel. We have no strikers, and without strikers, we will drop points as we did today.
Would love to see him and Weghorst jn a race.
No reason for them to. The goal this season was top four and we're very likely to finish in the top four as is. Bookie odds imply a probability of roughly 75%, for example. They'll be content with how things are.
We need him. World class, prem proven. He takes us up another level.
Likely is right, but we’ve fallen out of the top four from likely top four positions before. With Kane, we go from likely top four to stone wall top four. And the added half season to acclimate to the hot lights of OT would do Harry and United wonders to hit the new season at a full sprint.
I'm not estimating I'm saying that's all I'd pay.
I know Levy will want a billion
Yeah, Kane would have prevented every goal we conceded today. We should absolutely go out and sign him, whatever the cost…
They had an option of another year.
https://www.skysports.com/football/...on-is-met-with-tottenham-monitoring-situation
We are not on 2012, a year on which 25 million bought us RVP. We are on 2022, a year on which 70-80 million are needed to bring us Kane.
Sounds likee how people rate caceido after letting 2 goals in vs leicster90million in 2023
as if your actually using todays game as an example to not sign the best #9 we could possibly sign,
It's absolutely blatant we need a ST, and a midfielder. but we should sign the best available in both areas. Kane is easily the best CF we can sign and we should be all over it.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,565
- Supports
️
£20m 
We should sign Mbappe for £20m instead guys
£20m suggestion is nuts even if we are paying for just one extra season but I don’t think Levy would sell him to us even if we offer them £100m. He still has that perception of Spurs being fierce rivals to all PL clubs. We’d probably need to wait another year and just grab him for free when he is out of contract.
I’m hoping kane has some say in where he goes and wants to come here. In England, not a london club (that would tarnish his reputation imo). He wanted to go city two summers ago, didn’t get his move despite the gentleman’s agreement. He has got his head down and carried on with them.. I’m hoping if kane wants this move and we pay up the money.. we get him. Surely levy will want the money this summer for his rebuild.
I agree. But we're much more likely to be able to find an able backup for Casemiro (even a younger player with potential) than to find a top striker. There are very few out there, the ones that are younger have a question mark over their head. If we sign Kane we become title contendors straight away. No doubt. Sign Kane and spend the rest of the budget on younger players with the potential to take over from Eriksen/Casemiro.
How bout this guy at Brighton to be understudy
Kane has never been about pace but top finisher
If my memory serves me right we refused to sell Lingard, yeah Lingard to WH for some similar money last year. When he also had one year left.
Yeah making the most out of them two is vital
Yeah controlling CM but still lack a proper 9
Controlling a game is irrelevant if you're not scoring goals and no Rashford can't be a solution as a No9 because his hold up play and back to goal are far off that of an elite No9. A cheap squad player to an injury prone Martial won't work either because you're stockpiling the team with future deadwood
We need both a No9 AND a CM as equal priorities
The guy appears to be a born loser.
Wont this be due to the fact that it looks like Conte is leaving at the end of the season?
Hope he signs a contract, I’d much rather Osimhen.
Kane is class but I’d rather we go a striker we can likely rely on for the next 8-9 years than 2 or 3.
Kane is class but I’d rather we go a striker we can likely rely on for the next 8-9 years than 2 or 3.
Yesterday underlined we need speed up top.
lets call Napoli
lets call Napoli
Okay not a serious player !
Win What exactly ? Does he know that he play for Spurs
Lets go for the big guys like Osimhen or Vlahovic.
Win What exactly ?
Does he know that he play for Spurs Lets go for the big guys like Osimhen or Vlahovic.
Break the bank for Osimhen.
Id much rather he stay at Spurs to be honest, its going to take stupid money to sign him for a season or two at best.
Better invest in someone who will still be at his top in 5 years.
Will you say the same if Rashford extends?
Rashford's won more silverware than Kane
Ignoring that most recent tweet about him signing a new contract, I don't think the motivation will be there for Spurs to sell him this summer. Kane has guaranteed them 20+ goals per season for many years now, and Spurs are much, much worse without him. The powers that be over there may weigh whatever transfer fee they are likely to get for him versus having another season of him and then planning their next move for when he leaves (Or the small chance that he renews during that time again). Realistically, let's say they get 100 million for him, who can they get that will replace what he brings to their team with any certainty? It is a big gamble for them, and I can see a lot of reasons why they may prefer to keep him for one more season rather than sell him.
Good. I want someone younger. Watching the hungry lads at Arsenal was a bit of an eye opener.
No. Rashford plays for a big club on the up.
Well I’ll be damned.
Hope everyone who got outsmarted by Charlie Kane can admit how dumb they were being thinking this would happen.
Must really love spurs!