We can barely even contemplate a second bid for Mason Mount, I just don't see us haggling with Levy for bigger sums
I was pointing out about us not paying for Mount (when we are) as a reason as to why we’d possibly pay for KaneShouldn't this be in other thread
I was pointing out about us not paying for Mount (when we are) as a reason as to why we’d possibly pay for Kane
It’s like watching your child growLook at my beautiful hot thread
Transfer request it, Kane. Get this flying over 200 pages
You are in the wrong place if you don't want to discuss speculationIt is all speculation until there is a direct quote from the player or his manager (his brother) or the club.
Imo it makes a lot of sense if we go for Kane instead of Mount. Even for 100m. We simply must sign a #9 and Kane is probably the best you could get in this market.I was pointing out about us not paying for Mount (when we are) as a reason as to why we’d possibly pay for Kane
What makes it nonsensical?
You are in the wrong place if you don't want to discuss speculation
Imo it makes a lot of sense if we go for Kane instead of Mount. Even for 100m. We simply must sign a #9 and Kane is probably the best you could get in this market.
I can see the point you are making here but maybe if Harry Kane was 34 you would have a point, but he is still in his prime, an ultimate professional and someone who doesn't create any trouble.
He would score goals for fun at United and I really don't think there would be any type of circus.
Anyone United sign gets criticism from the press
Casemiro = too old
Antony = waste of money
Eriksen = past it
Grealish = just needs time to settle
Kelvin Phillips = just needs time to settle
The press will always try and create drama at United, as that what sells.
I know right?!Imagine having concerns about speculation in the Caf transfer forum during the Summer months?
Some posters silently prepare themselves for 9 months to unleash the fury of their inner transfer-muppet. Special stretches, exercises, diet and mental preparation! The whole nine yards just for these 3 sacred Summer months of speculative skullduggery.
Alot depends on how much levy wants to hamstring his manager next summer. FFP wise £80m-£100m gives you flexability in the market. Losing a player for free isnt good for FFP.I still think we’ll sign him
Alot depends on how much levy wants to hamstring his manager next summer. FFP wise £80m-£100m gives you flexability in the market. Losing a player for free isnt good for FFP.
its all about the benjamins...Certainly isn't but Levy won't want to go back on his word of not selling to a rival
its all about the benjamins...
As a striker on the pitch.So he's highly respected, not a troublemaker, would give us a perfect 3 seasons but would also be really bad business? Help me out with this one
we could put martial in the offer document (in white text) so its too late to notice when he turns up at the new lane for pre season training, with a limp.
I think we will go back in for him after the takeover
Got a feeling we'll see some news on us trying to get him soon. £50m plus Sancho maybe.
Let’s hope so.Are they actually interested in Sancho
Seen rumours, nothing concrete. You'd think Levy would like him as a signing though, young, English, resale value if he can re-find form and a big name still.Are they actually interested in Sancho
Yes. Kane is definitely worth the 100m outlay. Especially considering the alternatives.we drew 6 and lost 9 games last season. apart from the handful of complete meltdowns, having had Kane instead of Weghorst / Martial would have salvaged at least 12 points i reckon, and considering we finished 15 behind, it would have transformed our season. Add in some more midfield (Mount) and defensive (?) cover, and Kane makes us challengers at the very least. is that worth 100m of someone elses money? of course it is.
The only news we've had from the top journalists if we have pulled out of any race to sign him. The only person who says maybe we'd be tempted for 80 is a middling Daily Mail journalist. And supposedly price isn't the problem, it's Levy, so i'm not sure where all this hype has come from all of a sudden, nobody reliable has said anything even remotely close to us being back in the hunt for himGot a feeling we'll see some news on us trying to get him soon. £50m plus Sancho maybe.
I think we will go back in for him after the takeover
Let me spell it out for you friend:The only news we've had from the top journalists if we have pulled out of any race to sign him. The only person who says maybe we'd be tempted for 80 is a middling Daily Mail journalist. And supposedly price isn't the problem, it's Levy, so i'm not sure where all this hype has come from all of a sudden, nobody reliable has said anything even remotely close to us being back in the hunt for him
Let me spell it out for you friend:
M-U-P-P-E-T-S-E-A-S-O-N-H-A-S-A-R-R-I-V-E-D
Harry Kane trying for the 52nd time to hand in a transfer request to Levy.As a player he's a beast. As a person he's about a feeble as you can get. The type who orders tap water, eats ready salted and whose favourite colour is beige.
No way he's handing a transfer request in.