Actually - with a few notable exceptions:
feck OFF THE LOT OF YOU!!!!
feck OFF THE LOT OF YOU!!!!
Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic
- Thread starter anything about now
- Start date
- Status
could you change the color on this font size? to lets say a green or purple color - more BANG to it.
67
Actually, I reckon the words are colourful enough by themselves.
Also accurate of course.
wait here
67
67
So a bunch of pillocks who couldn't construct a coherent argument if their lives depended on it get their way because someone in power happens to be even more embarrassed than everyone else at having the facts pointed out.
Right - condemn someone on no evidence just because you've had your arse kicked in the past.
Do you get some kind of pleasure out of acting like a prick, give it a fecking rest for fecks sake, we've heard it all before from you a million times over.
Pompous prick.
keep digging son
just keep digging
just keep digging
Listen arsehole...
I post facts - they are often inconvenient.
My opponents (like yourself) generally post either lies or drivel.
When called upon to conduct a decent debate they all get very defensive or desperately ignore the idea that evidence should be produced to back up arguments (because they don't have any).
That's a good description of Noodle here - unable to back up anything he claims with evidence - for consistently pointing this out and objecting to false accusations I get not argument but abuse of privilege by him.
You're just a 'tag along' pillock, incapable of adding anything concrete to a debate.
It's like watching someone with torrets, you just can't stop yourself.
Are you like this in real life too? Or is this just purely your internet persona. For your sake I hope it's the latter because if not you must surely lead a very lonely life.
Oh and no, I am fully capable of making up my own mind about people thank you.
This thread gets better with every post.
To some extent you're right...
...when someone (Noods) is acting like an entirely dishonest spoilt child I really would struggle to stop myself commenting.
He's been dishonest in the vast majority of his posts in this thread - he's incapable of providing a decent argument for his position. The only 'advantage' he has is one of privilege which he then exploits shamelessly and dishonestly for his own ends. Pretty much sums him up it appears.
Just checked and saw that I needed 3 more posts for my half century in this thread.
And so it continues
Your rating is so conservative it's positively reticent isn't it?
posting of facts
everyone against me are saying lies
sounds like a track from the chief's greatest hits.
could there be 3 personas?
everyone against me are saying lies
sounds like a track from the chief's greatest hits.
could there be 3 personas?
how does one check anyway
You could always reply to this post wishing you good luck.
Thanks.
Click on the # of replies in the forum main page, it's next to the thread title.
Just..so...so..wrong.
Go back and read the stuff for the Goddess' sake.
to an extent it's too longwinded for me to read
and I'm not at all interested in your debate
I would like it to be back on hargraeves
but you are carrying on a crusade.
The simple fact of the matter is both sides are taking things out of context
it's how the world works
if you want pure reasoned debate, etc, then you are living in a very very naive world. There's no such thing in the real world
cheers mate
only 20 for me
more voyeur then active poster
only 20 for me
more voyeur then active poster
Yeah because you know me so well.........
Just say it as I see it.
Unfortunately your 'sight' is severely compromised.
You're another example of someone incapable of actually engaging with any of the points raised - no debate, no arguments - just accusations and insults.
Bit like the playground bullying of those different to you that you so enjoyed - baseless, cowardly, dishonest, but safe because you were in the majority.
Only six here, mostly calling FS a prick by all accounts, posts well spent I think.
Owen Hargreaves celebrates Psmith's 50th post in his thread.
It's like a Manc version of Jopub...........without the wit though.
Actually it does very nearly occur - for example in academia.
However, even there you need to be alert - even distinguished professors who are much published authors are sometimes not averse to misrepresenting their opponents' positions. The difference there is that when you point this out people take account of it.
No I'm wise enough to not get dragged into your repetetive bullshit, been there done that, I'd rather get a bit of enjoyment out of life, you should try it some time.
Let's see - you're the guy who reckons rejoicing in someone else's terror is really, really funny - and not in bad taste at all.
It's even better for you if the victim is of a type you are used to ridiculing throughout your adolescence because they are fatter ( but no more ugly) than yourself.
So your opinions count for shit. You're a dickhead, with the moral sense of a diseased prawn, you probably can't base an argument on evidence to save your life. Being called a 'prick' by you almost counts as a compliment.
What you mean is:
You can't actually conduct an argument - so you don't want to get shown up like the ignorant sh*t you are.
Pert, ban him!!
.
get in for 68!
Ok, so no point in me going on then, enjoy arguing with yourself, I have better things to do.
- Status