Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nucks said:
The passion seems to be fading boys.

I'll see if I can't reignite things.

Who would win in an MMA fight between Carrick and Hargreaves?!

Carrick would be the better JJ guy. He is probably also a better technical striker.

Hargreaves would be all about energy. He'd be taking Carrick down at will and after spinning in circles while he tried to get side control he'd be raining elbows down on Carrick.

Carrick would be undone by Hargreaves energy and quickness. He might punch better but it will be hard to create distance against a guy who is constantly harrying and pressuring him. Hargreaves is probably a sloppy finisher so I doubt he puts the fight away early. He wins a decision!
Click to expand...

I disagree, Hargreaves' energy would be his undoing; he'd tire early. Plus, Carrick has the obvious height advantage. Hargreaves wouldn't be able to get a takedown because Carrick would use telegraphed punches and kicks (much like his passing) to keep him out of range for a takedown: run in? - get smoked. If OH moved in for said takedown, Carrick would easily be able to sprawl and keep himself on top of things. That said, Carrick would prefer to keep it standing and would win by KO with a mighty kick to the head.
 
Feedingseagulls said:
Are you really that stupid or just trying to be irritating?

Note the complete lack of reasoning (and evidence) in your posts and continued misrepresentation of your opponent and their position.
Click to expand...

...

Feedingseagulls said:
but I fairly regularly criticise anyone and everyone who is guilty of intellectual dishonesty in any thread in any forum.
Click to expand...

Off you go then

You can start at page 1

Unless you were being a liar, of course
 
To be fair, I think sincher's on to something. It's the best theory I've seen in this thread. You want evidence? Here's what's left after Owen's prematch meal. No wonder the fecker can't tackle anymore

HarborPorpoiseSkeleton.jpg
 
noodlehair said:
...

Off you go then

You can start at page 1

Unless you were being a liar, of course
Click to expand...

but I fairly regularly criticise anyone and everyone who is guilty of intellectual dishonesty in any thread in any forum.
Click to expand...
That's 'fairly regularly criticise' not 'criticise each and every post made' - and that's in any thread/forum not every thread/forum.

I'm obviously saying I comment regularly, and may do so in any thread, additionally, no-one is automatically immune from possible criticism.

That doesn't mean I comment upon each and every post containing intellectual dishonesty - neither have I demanded anyone else do that - with the posting habits of the cafe you'd probably never be doing anything else.
 
Feedingseagulls said:
That's 'fairly regularly criticise' not 'criticise each and every post made' - and that's in any thread/forum not every thread/forum.

I'm obviously saying I comment regularly, and may do so in any thread, additionally, no-one is automatically immune from possible criticism.

That doesn't mean I comment upon each and every post containing intellectual dishonesty - neither have I demanded anyone else do that - with the posting habits of the cafe you'd probably never be doing anything else.
Click to expand...

but you never are doing anything else, aside from telling people off for laughing at a fat kid on a rollercoaster.

If you want to back out and admit defeat, just say so.
 
noodlehair said:
but you never are doing anything else, aside from telling people off for laughing at a fat kid on a rollercoaster.

If you want to back out and admit defeat, just say so.
Click to expand...

Well if you keep being intellectually dishonest whilst accusing me I'm going to keep mentioning it aren't I? You've done it again though - I've just posted in the 'red card' thread - I've mentioned porpoise(s).

I'm beginning to think you are incapable of conducting a 'debate' by doing anything other than misrepresenting other posters and their views.

Certainly you can't provide evidence to back up your accusations - I can and have.

EDIT: if you want to admit I never said I do, or will, comment on every post on the cafe, and that your claims of intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy were based on no (or misunderstood?) evidence - then go right ahead.
 
A1Dan said:
61 pages and counting, eh... is this for charity?

Or are you all actually Owen Hargreaves, running multiple browsers and trying to make himself look important?
Click to expand...
I tried to make it more interesting by talking about Noodle's mice and sincher's doing his best with the porpoise thing but it's not really working. Nucks idea of turning it into a video game fight had some promise but that's not developed into anything. It's like flogging a dead horse. Or feeding a seagull. Or something.

Incidently, if OH was using multiple browsers, it wouldn't be suprising if after what seemed like ages meandering about to little or no effect, the thread finally ended up going sideways to here or perhaps all the way back to here
 
kf said:
Incidently, if OH was using multiple browsers, it wouldn't be suprising if after what seemed like ages meandering about to little or no effect, the thread finally ended up going sideways to here or perhaps all the way back to here
Click to expand...

And if he's not been following the thread properly we could end up with this. :(
 
A1Dan said:
61 pages and counting, eh... is this for charity?

Or are you all actually Owen Hargreaves, running multiple browsers and trying to make himself look important?
Click to expand...

He is been the man everyone talks about, some good some bad but threads statistics says he is the caf favourite even whe he is not playing.
 
Is this an appropriate moment to interject and say I believe Hargreaves is grossly overrated and I didnt want him at United.

I dont think we needed him and Carrick has more than stood up to the test...

Anyway, thats my opinion, so I'll leave you lot to sit discussing the gastronomic delights of eating Porpoises...
 
ralphie88 said:
1. There's a fair chance this might be a figment of your imagination. There are a few on this thread, such as Zidane's UEFA Cup medal with Bordeaux :).
Click to expand...
Right and you middle name is Superman:rolleyes:

ralphie88 said:
...........- you just have to see the debates about atmosphere on here when those in the ground say it was good/bad and those watching on telly disagree.
Click to expand...
Mainly because they are dense. Because when the atmosphere is bad like on new years day. Even on tv it's abundantly clear. I hope this helps:D
 
fredthered said:
Is this an appropriate moment to interject and say I believe Hargreaves is grossly overrated and I didnt want him at United.
Click to expand...
No.:)

fredthered said:
I dont think we needed him and Carrick has more than stood up to the test...
Click to expand...
If you ain't SAF. You don't count buddy:p
(just kidding:D)

fredthered said:
Anyway, thats my opinion, so I'll leave you lot to sit discussing the gastronomic delights of eating Porpoises...
Click to expand...
Why? You seem to have wide spread knowledge of that new topic. I for one would like to learn from you:devil:
 
So Hargreaves loves to shag every human honestly. This is new information and a whole new debate. Can one shag EVERY human honestly. I suppose in an abundantly open relationship it's theoretically possible. But abundant shagging usually involves some degree of dishonesty somewhere along the line.

I'm just glad he doesn't shag the porpoises.
 
So, what's happening here? 61 pages? What's up?
I think I better get start and post something in this very long thread that I never bother to click open all this time.

p.s. Its my first time posting in this thread. Please be nice to me.
 
RedRonaldo said:
So, what's happening here? 61 pages? What's up?
I think I better get start and post something in this very long thread that I never bother to click open all this time.

p.s. Its my first time posting in this thread. Please be nice to me.
Click to expand...
First you've got to put your balls on the rails. Is Hargreaves shit or not?
 
Feedingseagulls said:
Well if you keep being intellectually dishonest whilst accusing me I'm going to keep mentioning it aren't I? You've done it again though - I've just posted in the 'red card' thread - I've mentioned porpoise(s).

I'm beginning to think you are incapable of conducting a 'debate' by doing anything other than misrepresenting other posters and their views.

Certainly you can't provide evidence to back up your accusations - I can and have.

EDIT: if you want to admit I never said I do, or will, comment on every post on the cafe, and that your claims of intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy were based on no (or misunderstood?) evidence - then go right ahead.
Click to expand...

We've been over this part already.

You've had it explained to you enough times, but continue to ignore, or fail to understand the difference between serious accusations, and tongue in cheek remarks.

That's not my fault.

You're worse than Soccerbest
 
Top 10

Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber 447
Sam#1 176
Instant Karma 129
acnumber9 100
WesBrownIsAGod 98
noodlehair 88
Sultan 76
Feedingseagulls 69
Feed Me 66
ralphie88 65
 
GE said:
Top 10

Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber 447
Sam#1 176
Instant Karma 129
acnumber9 100
WesBrownIsAGod 98
noodlehair 88
Sultan 76
Feedingseagulls 69
Feed Me 66
ralphie88 65
Click to expand...

Tell me you didn't actually count them...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.