Graham Potter | turns down Ajax job

There's lots of reasons why we've been shite this season. If you honestly think Potter is the only issue then fair enough.

I could go through a lot of the others but it would only be met with "you're trying to excuse Potter" or "boo hoo, spend a billion and can't score".
Nah go on, I'm curious.
 
Well, he's had a mini renaissance at AS Roma, and Chelsea would be desperate for a manager?

Anyway, no one's saying they would be mistakes on the same level.

He's also had 3 red cards, so it appears he hasn't mellowed in his later years.
I think that Mourinho and Boehly may not gel, both extremely strong characters, used to getting their own way
 
Maybe Chelseas squad could do with some old-timey putting the fear of god in them.

Graham could take a que from Ron Swanson and pull a tooth out with pliers in front of the squad to symbolize strength. Or Chelsea could hire Ron Swanson. Whichever works best
 
Jose is doing pretty well at Roma to be fair. He is still himself, but his tendency to be a massive a-hole seems to mesh well with the Italian league

Yeah, he is, isn't he. I would not be very surprised if it buys him a way back into managing a first-tier club again, if the circumstances align in the right way. Which isn't to say it would be a good idea.
 
What’s the point in comparing Arteta to Potter? Apples and oranges. Arteta didn’t have 400 players coming through the door to help with the situation, in fact he was getting rid of dickheads instead of stockpiling them.
 
Well, he's had a mini renaissance at AS Roma, and Chelsea would be desperate for a manager?

Anyway, no one's saying they would be mistakes on the same level.
There's a lot more availability in the managerial market than there is/has been in the striker market.
 
There's a lot more availability in the managerial market than there is/has been in the striker market.

Yeah, great. I'm happy to write for the third time that I'm not actually arguing that signing Aubameyang and signing Mourinho are exactly similar situations, if that's needed. Which apparently it is.
 
My point is just that just because something seems like an obviously ludicruous idea, that doesn't mean Todd Boehly won't do it.
One small problem, if/when we are next looking for a manager it would be the recruitment team, not him, making the decision.
 
Imho Dortmund will be the crucial fixture. If they win it will buy him some time, if he loses imho all bets are off and everything can happen - and then it's not about this season anymore but about how the best setup for the next one appears to be. If that means keeping Potter around for as a lame duck for as long as a new permanent manager would make sense to bring in, a short interim for the rest of this season or to back Potter no matter what (most unlikely scenario) it's anyone's guess..

They would need to score two goals in a game to progress against Dortmund in 90 or 120 minutes - something that they have not managed to do in 2023, even against much weaker opposition than Dortmund. With Thiago Silva out, they have also lost a key component in a fairly reliable defense.

I would not be optimistic about them going through.
 
Chelsea shouldnt sack him, everybody can see his body of work even before coming to England, the way his teams play football etc. On other hand if Chelsea wants just to throw players on pile and have a squad that requires managers that dont like building/developing than dunno why they hired Potter on the first place.
 
The idea that Potter isn’t a good manager is silly.

The idea that he’s not been abysmal at Chelsea is sillier.

I’d like to see him be given time and I think he’d be successful. Wouldn’t be saying the same if he was United manager though.

Football fans are fickle.
 
The idea that Potter isn’t a good manager is silly.

The idea that he’s not been abysmal at Chelsea is sillier.

I’d like to see him be given time and I think he’d be successful. Wouldn’t be saying the same if he was United manager though.

Football fans are fickle.

You have to still put points on the board through transitions and in the very first stint at any club. He’s not which in itself means not good enough so far.
 
You have to still put points on the board through transitions and in the very first stint at any club. He’s not which in itself means not good enough so far.

That's true, and even if I personally believe he can eventually turn it around, if you keep dropping points, especially at the rate Chelsea are currently doing, then he can have no arguments about losing his job. We are currently on a 6 game winless streak, the last time we won a game of any kind was in the middle of January nearly 7 weeks ago.

Most clubs, no matter where they are in the pyramid, would sack the manager for a run like that - 2 wins in 15 and we literally aren't scoring any goals, like at all. No team in the top 4 divisions has scored less goals than us post World Cup, we are 92nd out of 92 teams for goals scored since November. We have sunken to depths the likes of which I haven't seen at Chelsea in my lifetime. Potter's current record is the worst of any Chelsea manager in the last 30-ish years.

As much as I personally like him, his position is becoming increasingly indefensible.
 
The idea that Potter isn’t a good manager is silly.

The idea that he’s not been abysmal at Chelsea is sillier.

I’d like to see him be given time and I think he’d be successful. Wouldn’t be saying the same if he was United manager though.

Football fans are fickle.

A good manager for Brighton yes but a good manager for a top club at least up until this point no.
A good manager at Chelsea in this period would probably struggle, but from struggling to this fiasco is a long way. No one knows if he will come good but not many managers get second chances at top clubs, once you fail miserably the first time, chances are you are gone for good. For example: Moyes, Ole, Villas Boas and many others
 
It's not just Potter. The squad is insanely bloated but no goals in it.

Clearlake seem actually insane.

They could have taken their time with transfers. Financial fair play limited to 5 years or not. No need to stuff the squad with potential as quick as they've done.
 
Would he survive another bad result on the weekend? Asking for a friend.
 
The idea that Potter isn’t a good manager is silly.

The idea that he’s not been abysmal at Chelsea is sillier.

I’d like to see him be given time and I think he’d be successful. Wouldn’t be saying the same if he was United manager though.

Football fans are fickle.
Problem is you'd think they spent too much money to be patient with Potter for a longer period of time. But who knows, maybe Boehly is going to stick with him beyond this season.
 
Problem is you'd think they spent too much money to be patient with Potter for a longer period of time. But who knows, maybe Boehly is going to stick with him beyond this season.

I think he’s got the ability to coach top quality footballers. Doesn’t have the clout to have ten training with the reserves though. Probably doesn’t even know which of the 30+ players he wants to keep. Probably gets no say in who’s coming in either. Odd job.

I think he’d do well enough if given a pre season. So would plenty of other managers though.
 
We need to do everything we can in order to keep him in his job. If it means protests, then so be it.

 
That's true, and even if I personally believe he can eventually turn it around, if you keep dropping points, especially at the rate Chelsea are currently doing, then he can have no arguments about losing his job. We are currently on a 6 game winless streak, the last time we won a game of any kind was in the middle of January nearly 7 weeks ago.

Most clubs, no matter where they are in the pyramid, would sack the manager for a run like that - 2 wins in 15 and we literally aren't scoring any goals, like at all. No team in the top 4 divisions has scored less goals than us post World Cup, we are 92nd out of 92 teams for goals scored since November. We have sunken to depths the likes of which I haven't seen at Chelsea in my lifetime. Potter's current record is the worst of any Chelsea manager in the last 30-ish years.

As much as I personally like him, his position is becoming increasingly indefensible.
This is just saying same thing twice in a sentence.
 
It would take a huge turn around in form and fortune for him to be a success after this start.

Is he asking for all these players or is someone above taking the scattergun approach?
 
You have to wonder if he was signed because he was scouted or because of the hype.
He is promising to be fair. But with Lamps, Gerrard and now Potter, for me it's clear that promising English managers should try and gain experience at a big club in a major European league before making the jump to a bigger English club.
 
I dont think the size of the club was the stumbling block. Things have been chaotic there for a year now with Abramovich and most of his backroom team leaving. The churn with players is probably just the most visible part of the changes at the club.
And they've bought 20 odd players without addressing the one weakness in the team from the last 2 / 3 years. They had a good defence, keepers and full backs and a good selection of midfielders.
I'd be surprised if any of the defenders they've brought in fare as well as Rudiger or the midfielders give them as good a selection as Jorginho, Kovacic and Kante over recent years. Their forward line is weak and bloated with ill fitting parts. I think its going to be an uphill battle from midtable for anyone coming in.
Tuchel is a good coach and he was having a hard time too. Its not entirely down to Potter.
How many of their recent signings are you gutted about missing out on? How many of whats left would you pay the fees they paid for?
Potters past the point of no return. Keeping him to buy time to bring someone else in is fine but he's clearly done. I dont envy whoever comes in unless a vaguely competent striker comes in with them. They dont even need to be good, Weghorst would do a job for them.
 
Yeah, he is, isn't he. I would not be very surprised if it buys him a way back into managing a first-tier club again, if the circumstances align in the right way. Which isn't to say it would be a good idea.
Mourinho at PSG would be tasty. Imagine all the drama...