Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,784
What a disgrace
You probably weren't given a reply because it's loaded question with a ridiculous generalization. Try asking a better question.I asked this question elsewhere today but got no reply.
How is it that the people backing Ole to the hilt appear to be the ones who hate Woodward and the Glazers the most? Surely if you think Ole is right and the project is right then finally Ed and the owners are doing something right?
If all the players we bought are the right type of United player and the club briefed everyone after the media that a transfer board has been put in place and that the type of signing will be different to the past years, then once again, are the club/Woodward/owners not starting to get it right?
How do you marry the two? That Ole and the project is great for the long term, but that Woodward and the Glazers need to feck off?
You do realise new Arab owners wouldn't have Ole managing for a single second longer or give any shits about a "United way"?
I asked this question elsewhere today but got no reply.
How is it that the people backing Ole to the hilt appear to be the ones who hate Woodward and the Glazers the most? Surely if you think Ole is right and the project is right then finally Ed and the owners are doing something right?
If all the players we bought are the right type of United player and the club briefed everyone after the media that a transfer board has been put in place and that the type of signing will be different to the past years, then once again, are the club/Woodward/owners not starting to get it right?
How do you marry the two? That Ole and the project is great for the long term, but that Woodward and the Glazers need to feck off?
You do realise new Arab owners wouldn't have Ole managing for a single second longer or give any shits about a "United way"?
You probably weren't given a reply because it's loaded question with a ridiculous generalization. Try asking a better question.
How is it loaded?
I'm asking the question because despite thinking Ole's a terrible appointment, I do believe the club is finally getting it right with having a direction with regards to where they want to head. I think they have listened to Sir Alex and David Gill with regards to having a transfer committee and a manager who has the right ideals.
So I want some explanation as to how those backing Ole and the project don't give any credit to Woodward or the owners for that very appointment and project?
How is it that the people backing Ole to the hilt appear to be the ones who hate Woodward and the Glazers the most?
You really can't see how?
Anyone who responds essentially admits they apply to both of these weird generalizations. Arguing from a losing position. That's how.
Both are wrong. Stop looking for contradictions when the problem is right in front of your face.I asked this question elsewhere today but got no reply.
How is it that the people backing Ole to the hilt appear to be the ones who hate Woodward and the Glazers the most? Surely if you think Ole is right and the project is right then finally Ed and the owners are doing something right?
If all the players we bought are the right type of United player and the club briefed everyone after the media that a transfer board has been put in place and that the type of signing will be different to the past years, then once again, are the club/Woodward/owners not starting to get it right?
How do you marry the two? That Ole and the project is great for the long term, but that Woodward and the Glazers need to feck off?
You do realise new Arab owners wouldn't have Ole managing for a single second longer or give any shits about a "United way"?
Build a Bonfire, Build a Bonfire
Put the Glazers on the top
Put Woodward in the middle
And we’ll burn the fecking lot
Stretford End finally waking up.
Stretford End finally waking up.
It's so predictable, isn't it?Expect few signings & DoF rumours in the next few days to calm this shit storm then nothing going to happen as usual.
It's so predictable, isn't it?
The chants calling for him to die were quite tasteless though.
I think that's the first time I've heard anti-Woodward/Glazer chants at OT. I'm glad they only started when we were already 3-0 up. Makes it clear that we're not against the players or the manager, just the board above them.
Because Ole has had only a few months to make a difference and he is an actual legend of the club. He deserves respect and support. He came at a time when the club was in the doldrums, reeling under the toxicity and negativity that Jose left behind. He picked the boys up from that quagmire and actually took us into a winning run that ended with the PSG game.How is it loaded?
I'm asking the question because despite thinking Ole's a terrible appointment, I do believe the club is finally getting it right with having a direction with regards to where they want to head. I think they have listened to Sir Alex and David Gill with regards to having a transfer committee and a manager who has the right ideals.
And I could go through the threads Mack and absolutely prove to you that there are an incredible amount of posters that are backing Ole and every little thing about the project whilst then jumping into Glazer/Woodward threads and absolutely tearing them to pieces.
So I want some explanation as to how those backing Ole and the project don't give any credit to Woodward or the owners for that very appointment and project?
Exactly 10 years ago we had them, 'Love United, Hate Glazer' 'Green and Gold until the Club is sold' and We want Glazers Out.