NoLogo
Full Member
Bellingham really likes to get into fights, doesn't he?
Bellingham really likes to get into fights, doesn't he?
I think the foremost contributing factor to a league's popularity is success and big name players, case in point serie a and laliga during their hay days were chock full of teams with tumescent play styles yet it didn't deter people from following them , entertaining styles also help but I doubt its the major incentive that its touted to be .That only matters to people who follow the league as a whole though; each individual clubs and its fan won't give a rat's ass about the league's overall diversity of play, they just want their team to do well and be fun to watch.
Besides that, I think football culture factors into this as well. In the Netherlands, for example, defensive football is strongly frowned upon. The only way a coach can get away with it at any level, is if they're successful. (I.e., punching above your weight; not every team is expected to win trophies, of course.) If you're playing defensive and not achieving more (or worse, achieve less) than what any coach would, fan and media pressure will rise very quickly and you won't last long. Even Van Gaal in 2014 in Brazil received heavy criticism throughout the tournament because of his play style, even though the Netherlands reached the semis.
In England, however, I get the impression it's almost the other way around. Defensive security is highly valued and the idea that football must be entertainment isn't as strong; and so as far as I can tell, there is more criticism of the likes of Leeds for playing too openly (even though they had a super safe finish last year for a newly promoted team) than of the likes of Burnley for playing boringly (while generally camping in the bottom half of the table).
My impression is that Germany is more with the Netherlands in this, although of course the details vary.
Yeah, various things go into the popularity of leagues, also simply the accessibility of match coverage. Either way, I don't think any coach or club considers this when deciding how their team will play - although they will want their team to be interesting, of course.I think the foremost contributing factor to a league's popularity is success and big name players, case in point serie a and laliga during their hay days were chock full of teams with tumescent play styles yet it didn't deter people from following them , entertaining styles also help but I doubt its the major incentive that its touted to be .
Yeah, it's not a full-on mantra: thou shalt play an attacking 4-3-3 (except at Ajax!). Feyenoord is also generally not known for its pretty football; their image is all about being hard-working. But it's generally not defensive-first, counterattacking football, and that gets you criticism even when you win.Completely agree with your point about football culture , though if I'm not mistaken some of the Dutch teams during the 80s like psv were rather practical to say the least though perhaps my memory is failing me.
Yeah I imagine the priority for every single coach even idealistic zealots such as bielsa is to simply get results or just stay up, as all the media adulation in the world won't guarantee on the pitch success .Yeah, various things go into the popularity of leagues, also simply the accessibility of match coverage. Either way, I don't think any coach or club considers this when deciding how their team will play - although they will want their team to be interesting, of course.
Yeah, it's not a full-on mantra: thou shalt play an attacking 4-3-3 (except at Ajax!). Feyenoord is also generally not known for its pretty football; their image is all about being hard-working. But it's generally not defensive-first, counterattacking football, and that gets you criticism even when you win.
Ricardo Pepi, who just became Augsburg's record signing.Who is the ‘Tom Brady of soccer?’
I get your point, but it simply doesn't really work to punch above your weight when you just try to be negative. You might shithouse your way to some wins, but you can't consistently grind out wins against nominally stronger teams that way. Most surprise success stories in the last years in the Bundesliga were teams that just clicked in the way they played.not exactly a popular sentiment but I really do enjoy organizedand rough and tough negative football if executed well , watching Jose's inter was a joy(more so than that barca side) and I really do feel these sort of teams do need to exist especially seeing how they out punch their weight and create compelling underdog stories.
I might be antiquated in my views and this doesn't necessarily reflect the current state of affairs especially in bundes but at least in Europe the large majority of the underdog teams that went on to have great success were those exact negative types( stue bucuresti , red star , porto , psv , odm and Monaco and etc ).I get your point, but it simply doesn't really work to punch above your weight when you just try to be negative. You might shithouse your way to some wins, but you can't consistently grind out wins against nominally stronger teams that way. Most surprise success stories in the last years in the Bundesliga were teams that just clicked in the way they played.
The one exception already mentioned is Union Berlin, but I wouldn't really say they are punching above their weight - they have a pretty strong defensive setup, but they have top class attackers (especially Kruse and Awoniyi) who can decide a game on their own and could still or in the future play for true top teams.
I think this comes down to the difference between cup and league games. When you just don't lose, you can go through in a cup tournament, but when you are hard to beat, but don't really have the means to consistently score goals, you won't win many games and are going nowhere in a league.I might be antiquated in my views and this doesn't necessarily reflect the current state of affairs especially in bundes but at least in Europe the large majority of the underdog teams that went on to have great success were those exact negative types( stue bucuresti , red star , porto , psv , odm and Monaco and etc ).
Credits to dourtmod as they were pretty adventurous both times they got there but the point stands . In the end of the day its much more feasible to drill defensive awareness and commitment into a low quality and less talented group of players through sheer will and hard work ethic compared to the more attacking minded styles that require naturally gifted players to execute, that was my impression playing football and I think it also applies to the higher levels.
Good point unfortunately Villarreal proved it last year at our expense.I think this comes down to the difference between cup and league games. When you just don't lose, you can go through in a cup tournament, but when you are hard to beat, but don't really have the means to consistently score goals, you won't win many games and are going nowhere in a league.
I've responded to your final paragraph in the Eredivisie thread, but I just wanted to add that I see nothing wrong conceptually with safety-first football. I don't personally enjoy it and it won't win much anymore (Mourinho's tactics don't work anymore with how defences are organized now); but I can see how it's tactically interesting and why it might seem attractive to underdog teams. (Although as it's 3 points for a win and just 1 for a draw, taking a risk for the win seems likely to me to be more rewarding long term.)not exactly a popular sentiment but I really do enjoy organizedand rough and tough negative football if executed well , watching Jose's inter was a joy(more so than that barca side) and I really do feel these sort of teams do need to exist especially seeing how they out punch their weight and create compelling underdog stories.
The same way it used to work for Stoke, Bolton for some seasonsIt worked wonders for them for many years continuously punching above their weight and staying in the prem for quitesome time .
Don't forget they still do outperform the expectations. look at Leeds , they should comfortably be mid table yet are almost relegation level. The argument goes the other way as well.The same way it used to work for Stoke, Bolton for some seasons
Every season a variant of Burnley goes into relegation whether it's Stoke, Allardyce West Brom or Sheffield
Don't forget they still do outperform the expectations. look at Leeds , they should comfortably be mid table yet are almost relegation level. The argument goes the other way as well.
They're squad is one of the more expensive ones if I'm not mistaken.Why should Leeds be comfortably midtable?
They got promoted last season with West Brom and Fulham, while the others relegated, Leeds finished midtable
Embarrassing pitch in the Olympiastadion.
Haven't checked the schedule but it can only mean Bayern are coming soon and they're waiting to change it until then
On the one hand I'm pleased to hear that, on the other hand I'm not pleased that reality didn't match my conspiracy narrativeWell you'll be pleased to know that the pitch will get changed this week, just in time for Bayern's visit in 2 weeks. ^^
Of course Hertha and Union will battle there 3 days before that match so the pitch might end up looking the same.
Just be thankful you've seen the back of Gladbach for this season!On the one hand I'm pleased to hear that, on the other hand I'm not pleased that reality didn't match my conspiracy narrative
Yes, the team with the second most Bundesliga titles is basically uselessGladbach seems to only exist to annoy Bayern. Otherwise they are totally useless.
Well, that is history. They really did not do much impressive stuff in the last year except annoying Bayern.Yes, the team with the second most Bundesliga titles is basically useless
Really? How's that? How bad exactly was he, can we say, after he was given a whopping two months to work? How much do we know about it?Wolfsburg now 8 losses in a row (2 CL, 6 Bundesliga). Horrible decision to sign Kohfeldt as their new manager their. Van Bommel was bad, that's true and he rightfully had to go, but this is even worse.
Not that I complain, I love to see that
Not knowing the rules and getting your club disqualified from the cup was an early warning sign.Really? How's that? How bad exactly was he, can we say, after he was given a whopping two months to work? How much do we know about it?
Why does everyone swallow the VfL club line that he "had" to be fired, after the 8th match day?
Because he was fed up with Schmadtke and Schäfer telling him whom to pick, how to train, and how to play?
Suddenly Hoffenheim are third. That might be the most surprising development.Meanwhile on the other end everyone up to Leipzig is still in contention for top four, Cologne are suddenly within striking distance of Freiburg and Hoffenheim.
Suddenly Hoffenheim are third. That might be the most surprising development.
Interesting weeks upcoming for Dortmund, as they play most teams of the chasing pack in their next games. They could be very safe second in the table after that run, or the pack could draw them down to their brawl for CL qualification. Going into the second half of the season with 9 teams involved in the top 4/CL race is unusual I think?
I hate these 'useless' and 'pointless' comments though. Gladbach played European football just last season, so if they're pointless, then I guess Bayern and the non-Bayern Pokal winners have been the only useful German clubs the past decade? Such a condescending point of view. (With which I'm sure you don't agree either as a Hannover guy.)Well, that is history. They really did not do much impressive stuff in the last year except annoying Bayern.
Amazing stuff. The kid has managed to retire the corrupt, incompetent feck.
We should build Bellingham a statue, put it right next to this grotesque football sculpture in front of the DFB main building.
True, that's why I limited my statement to the last year, since they dropped out of the CL.I hate these 'useless' and 'pointless' comments though. Gladbach played European football just last season, so if they're pointless, then I guess Bayern and the non-Bayern Pokal winners have been the only useful German clubs the past decade? Such a condescending point of view. (With which I'm sure you don't agree either as a Hannover guy.)
Sorry, no. Zwayer got murder threats etc. from Dortmund fans via social media and that is what Bellingham with his stupidity started. That kid should have been fined a lot more just to know how to act as a professional today and what that can cause.
That story happened nearly 20 years ago when Zwayer himself was very young and he was just had a minimal role in it and helped to clear it - since than he has a clean sheet. No - he might not always have refereed fair - like every of this referees. A brat like Bellingham for sure does not have the right to judge about that.
Allegedly taking money and sitting on the information for six months while Hoyzer was free to manipulate games is not a minimal role and the whole thing was cleared up, because of Manuel Gräfe: It was only after he had called the referee boss himself and told Zwayer about it that the latter suddenly decided to talk.
Bellingham's accusations were deeply unprofessional (and death threats are obviously even more over any kind of reasonable line), but because Zwayer's involvement had been swept under the rug entirely at the time, the questions about his integrity were never resolved and still there to be asked, even if it was so long ago. Which is also why DFB couldn't go to town on Bellingham with their ruling. I mean in that Kicker article Zwayer's own boss is singing from the same hymn sheet as Bellingham, just in a more polite way.
It was never really clear what happened. It should not play a role if he had come clean at the time, but he didn't, the DFB tried to cover his involvement. That's the key why he isn't trusted.There was a very young referee who wanted to make a career in football - and the senior referee he was administered to was the one that was the bad guy. Think yourself into that situation especially if you might not trust the higher DFB officials who looked the other way before...
I actually do not really care about Zwayer's role in that. No matter what - it happened nearly 20 years ago (but not the "big" thing) when he was young and since then acted flawless. It should not play a role anymore.
It was never really clear what happened. It should not play a role if he had come clean at the time, but he didn't, the DFB tried to cover his involvement. That's the key why he isn't trusted.
I am sure far less people would have a problem if he had made his role public once the scandal was discovered.