jderbyshire
Has anybody seen my fleshlight?
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,307
Corbyn last, when everyone's lost interest because of how painstakingly boring it all is.
Exactly. It wasn't at all a story when Corbyn wanted to wait until after a business event to answer a member of the media's completely unrelated question on Syria...This just seems sensible tbh. Its not like every party isn't micromanaging their media presence anyway, this just limits the potential for snafus.
The BBC is massively left wing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...BC-is-biased-toward-the-left-study-finds.html
Er, the research is by the CPS though
Now that isn't fair. You forgot to mention that whilst a Murdoch employee he gave a job to holocaust denier David Irving.We can expect a fair level of reporting from former Tory researcher, Murdoch employee, and resident BBC right winger Andrew Neil.
Massively left wing is ridiculous. Slightly, but consistently left wing, yes.The BBC is massively left wing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...BC-is-biased-toward-the-left-study-finds.html
Er, the research is by the CPS though
He is very good tbf. At least as good as Paxman- seen him savage both sides tbf.We can expect a fair level of reporting from former Tory researcher, Murdoch employee, and resident BBC right winger Andrew Neil.
When did Natalie Bennett step down as leader? Her interviews were great, particularly the fake coughing fit oneWhat a joke, no greens
What a joke, no greens
Neil does get partisan on Brexit and climate change, which are two particularly annoying things to get partisan on to me.
Yeah I like Andrew Neil, I was just getting my complaints in early.He is very good tbf. At least as good as Paxman- seen him savage both sides tbf.
Sceptic, at least in every interview I've seen him do. Him and Portillo also like to bring up when ice sheets are larger than usual, not a peep last year when it went horrifically low.What's his climate change position?
Irving was actually a respected historian until he went a bit, er, mad.Now that isn't fair. You forgot to mention that whilst a Murdoch employee he gave a job to holocaust denier David Irving.
I'm sure many lefties on here would still be moaning if the ghost of Lenin was doing the interview.Yeah I like Andrew Neil, I was just getting my complaints in early.
Christ, how can someone hold a position like his and be that retarded? Surely if someone got caught out by him in an interview they could just trot that out and it makes everything he says invalid.Sceptic, at least in every interview I've seen him do. Him and Portillo also like to bring up when ice sheets are larger than usual, not a peep last year when it went horrifically low.
Can't tell if this was satire (guessing it was) - Mr and Mrs JC have been invited onto the show as well. Doesn't sound like they've accepted the invite.Where's Corbyn's One Show interview, fecking disgraceful bias yet again from the BBC. I bet it was that sneaky Kuenssberg having a word, that little agenda spinner doing her work as an undercover agent for the Tories.
Who do you think Dimbleby is biased towards? I've always liked him, not sure if that suggests he's biased towards the left..I don't doubt you but do you have a source or list or anything?
Andrew Neil is obviously right-wing, but I think he does a pretty impartial job when interviewing. Can't say the same for Dimbleby, he's openly biased and shouldn't be in the job.
Who do you think Dimbleby is biased towards? I've always liked him, not sure if that suggests he's biased towards the left..
She didn't exactly. Greens have two year terms for leadership and she rather understandably decided not to stand for re-election.When did Natalie Bennett step down as leader? Her interviews were great, particularly the fake coughing fit one
Shame, she was entertaining.She didn't exactly. Greens have two year terms for leadership and she rather understandably decided not to stand for re-election.
By the time of his employment by Andrew his views on the Nazis and particularly the Holocaust were well established.Irving was actually a respected historian until he went a bit, er, mad.
One word for it.Shame, she was entertaining.
By the time of his employment by Andrew his views on the Nazis and particularly the Holocaust were well established.
Yaaaas!
Who do you think Dimbleby is biased towards? I've always liked him, not sure if that suggests he's biased towards the left..
Expert? He was Hermann F*cking Goerring.Ah, missed the top bit and thought you'd tagged me by mistake with the fox hunting. Was it defo known then? Think his rep took a weirdly long time to deteriorate from memory. Wasn't he also still regarded as an expert on the Luftwaffe iirc.
Going by wiki, it was a job as translating Goebbels diaries for serialisation. Neil defended it at the time saying that though Irving was "reprehensible", it was just a translating job, which is a bullshit excuse. Plenty of feckers speak German without also holding sympathies for the third reich!Ah, missed the top bit and thought you'd tagged me by mistake with the fox hunting. Was it defo known then? Think his rep took a weirdly long time to deteriorate from memory. Wasn't he also still regarded as an expert on the Luftwaffe iirc.
The Antarctic ice sheet is growing and it is not fully understood why that is. So his statements might be factually correct. Using that as argument against climate-change is not convincing so.Christ, how can someone hold a position like his and be that retarded? Surely if someone got caught out by him in an interview they could just trot that out and it makes everything he says invalid.
The antarctic sea-ice extent suffered a large drop at the end of last year and is still well below average for this time of year. The point is more that he picks and chooses when he talks about it.The Antarctic ice sheet is growing and it is not fully understood why that is. So his statements might be factually correct. Using that as argument against climate-change is not convincing so.
'how can you have any pudding if you haven't had your greens!'
It always used to be the right in the UK donning their tinfoil hats about BBC bias, now it is the left.
Hardly a surprise. Did you watch the Vice documentary on Corbyn and his team?The sort of shite you'd expect from May, or even worse Trump. Poor from Corbyn.
Depends on how bad it gets. Ironically if it's catastrophic (down to 120 odd, which shouldn't happen but you never can tell) there's more of a chance because that would only require 18 nominations. If it's instead just the more "really bad" scenario of 160, the numbers get a lot harder for them. There's about 20 at the moment if you include the likes of Thornberry and Gardiner who aren't true believers. Bit more uncertainty among the new selections though. I still think if they don't have the numbers they'll just try and keep him in, getting close to Ed's vote share is everything for them at the moment.I increasingly like Jim Waterson.
@Ubik - What would you say are the chances of Corbynite MPs making up 15% of the PLP after the election? They're mostly in safe seats so surely it's looking more and more likely?