General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
So what happens when the the corporates/wealthy subsequently close down or relocate and lay staff off?
If we increase corporation tax to 26% as Labour plan to, we'd still have lower corporation tax than all of the other G7 countries. There isn't a reason why it needs to be so low and be cut again and again. Is our economy seeing any benefit from that? The economy has been shit under the Tories and the national deficit has grown and grown.

What will make (and already is making) corporations relocate is Brexit. I think that's much more of a factor than an increase in corporation tax which still gives corporations a very low tax rate when compared to other advanced nations
 
So what happens when the the corporates/wealthy subsequently close down or relocate and lay staff off?
Part of this is addressed by plans to change the way corporates are taxed, so that tax becomes payable based on where the profits are generated. There was a response to a journalists question where Corbyn talked about espressos and Luxemburg. I'd have to search for a video of that. As for wealthy corporates and individuals relocating - they currently hide their income in tax havens abroad as it is. FATCA was an attempt by the US to tackle that but it was problematic due to protection of bank account holders details being enshrined in legislation in Jersey, Guernsey and elsewhere. I must confess I'm not sure on how Labour plan to address that. If I discover more on that I'll be sure to post it.

Edit: Transcript from interview with Robert Preston:
RP: Now I’ve got to ask you a very important question because it comes from our viewers, as you know we always ask our viewers for a question, [JC - good] and this is from Westminster Mum. Don’t Labour’s costings assume all big businesses will stay in the UK and not move elsewhere if you put up corporation tax? What if they leave?

JC: Well, they’re still going to be doing business in Britain and our whole tax idea and our whole tax model is that you’re taxed on the business you do in Britain, so if you sell a vast amount of coffee in Britain then we ask you to pay the tax in Britain for the coffee you’ve sold rather than pay it in Luxembourg which clearly could not consume, even if everybody was on a sort of treble espresso every day could not consume as much coffee as this country.
 
Last edited:
Attempt Number 2 at my Labour Manifesto Critique

What I like:
Deliver safe staffing levels in the NHSand reduce waiting lists
Vital.

Scrap NHS pay cap
Vital.

NHS will receive more than £30bn in extra funding over the next parliament
Great

Mental health budgets will be ring-fenced, and Labour will ensure all children in secondary schools have access to a counselling service.
Vote Labour

Scrap Conservatives' Brexit White Paper and replace with "fresh negotiating priorities" with strong emphasis on retaining the benefits of the single market and customs union
Good. This should have been bigger.

International students will not be included in immigration numbers, but the party will crack down on "fake colleges".
Seriously, even the Tories will start doing this soon. International Students pay excruciating fees! They are vital for our universities.

Guarantee the rights of EU nationals living in the UK and work to "secure reciprocal rights" for UK citizens elsewhere in the EU
Good.

Keep EU-derived laws on workers' rights, equality, consumer rights and environmental protections
Good.

Re-introduce the 50p rate of tax on the highest earners (above £123,000) and Income tax rate 45p on £80,000 and above
Good. Possibly this should be done in another way, but we need to raise receipts one way or another


Reintroduce maintenance grants for university students and abolish university tuition fees
If they can do this, it would be amazing

A National Education Service for England to incorporate all forms of education
Possibly the type of thing that needs to be cross-party to be done properly

Promise to reduce class sizes to "less than 30" for five, six, and seven-year-olds
Great. Pretty much every party has promised this over the years.

Ensure that 60% of the UK's energy comes from zero-carbon or renewable sources by 2030
Sadly, there has been nearly no mention of this. Of course it's quite a generic "look at us, we're green!" commitment that is so far away, everyone will have forgotten about it. But still, important.

A ban on fracking
Again, no one is talking about this.

Nuclear power "will continue to be part of the UK energy supply"
A surprising but important commitment.

More free childcare, expanding free provisions for two, three and four year olds
Good.

Hire 10,000 new police officers, 3,000 new firefighters
Needed.

Accept the EU referendum result and "build a close new relationship with the EU" prioritising jobs and and workers' rights
Good.

Free school meals for all primary school children, paid for by removing the VAT exemption on private school fees.
Schools meals are awful, but this can only be a good thing

Maximum pay ratios of 20:1 to be rolled out in public sector
Now that is a good one

Ban unpaid internships
I'd agree with that, even if it's just at the apprentice rate, it's clearly needed. Interns in Mexico get paid, for christ sake.

Give all workers equal rights from day one, whether part-time or full-time, temporary or permanent
Pretty much already the case anyway

Abolish employment tribunal fees - so that people have access to justice
Makes sense

Legislate to ban letting agency fees for tenants, and look at giving the Mayor of London power to give London renters "additional security"
I like it.

Make 4,000 additional homes available for rough sleepers to end homelessness.
Sure, sounds like a good idea.

End hospital car parking charges
I'd rather just the NHS own the car parks, and charge a high rate, with discounts for frequent fliers. But okay.

Homeowners will be offered interest free loans to improve their properties
Can see the logic in that. Everyone benefits in the long term. But room for abuse.

Guarantee help to buy funding until 2027 and give locals buying their first home "first dibs on new homes built in their area"
Would like this to go further, but important.

An end to the so-called "rape clause" - part of the policy of restricting child tax credits to the first two children in a family. It means mothers who have a third child as a result of rape can be exempted, but would have to provide evidence in order to do so
Can you believe the Conservatives created a rape clause.

A review into reforming council tax and business rates, in favour of options such as a land value tax
Lib Dems, is that you?

Deliver universal superfast broadband availability by 2022
Why not.

Scrap quarterly reporting for businesses with a turnover of under £85,000.
Could see this being helpful

One million people will be taken off NHS waiting lists by "guaranteeing access to treatment within 18 weeks"
Not really explained how, but good.

Cuts to bereavement support payment will be scrapped, as will the bedroom tax and the "punitive sanctions regime"
Seems weird the BBC have thrown these three in together. But yeah, sure.

Rejects" proposal to increase state pension age further
This is a weird one. Ask any young person in industries like finance and they'll say, they do not think our generation will get a state pension at all (or rather, it will be reserved only for the poorest). I'm all for this, as long as it doesn't bring a collapse do the whole thing.

Maintaining access to the EU's internal energy market and retaining access to nuclear research programme Euratom will be a priority in Brexit negotiations.
Can't argue with that.

Extend high speed rail link HS2 to Scotland
Arguably good or bad. Arguably vital. The limitations of HS2 and HS1 become more pronounced with time, but still important.

Build a new Brighton main line for the SouthEast
This is why we love Labour.

Build Crossrail 2 - to run north-south through London between Hertfordshire and Surrey - "to ensure our capital continues to prosper"
Bit confused by this pledge, but why not.

Recognise the need for additional airport capacity in the South East (but there's no mention of Heathrow).
I agree, expand Gatwick and Heathrow (but not over the M25)... but actually try to reduce the number of planes in Heathrow over time, and move some of the services to Gatwick. Then build a fast 15 minute shuttle between the two to allow both to act as a joint hub. That's what I'd do anyway.

Support the renewal of the Trident submarine system
The cost of trident is around £2 bn per year. Much of that at least goes back into the UK economy in the form of jobs, although it's still a waste on something that will hopefully never be used. Government spending is around £750 bn per year. The GDP of the UK was £2.2 trillion in 2005. In a way, Trident is pointless. The biggest nuclear threat to this country isn't over states, it's terrorist organisations (along with chemical and biological attacks), or maybe rogue foreign security services. And unlike what Piers Morgan believes, Trident does not offer Tactical Nuclear capabilities, (or if it does, it does so barely). But in another way, it's important to maintain the status quo that's allowed peace to prosper. It can also be used as a bargaining chip in future...

Work with international partners and the UN on multilateral disarmament "to create a nuclear-free world"
... Such as in this situation.

Insulate the homes of disabled veterans for free.
Yeah, why not.

Labour will not "scapegoat migrants" and will not set a cap on immigration, describing targets as "bogus"
Good!

Maintain UK's leading research role by seeking to stay part of Horizon 2020 and its successor programmes
Great.

Seek to maintain membership of European organisations which offer benefits to the UK such as Euratom and the European Medicines Agency
Great.

Will not allow Brexit to be used as an excuse to undercut UK farmers and flood Britain's food chain with cheap and inferior produce.
Had never even considered this. Sure.

A "meaningful" role for Parliament throughout Brexit negotiations
Sure

Bring the railways back into public ownership as franchises expire
Rail does seem to be one of the few things that should be nationalised. Even many on the right agree with that (Peter Hitchens). My one worry is in major rail investment, what will the impact of self driving cars in 20 years time. Could have gone in indifferent or good.

Regain control of energy supply networks through the alteration of operator license conditions, and transition to a publicly owned, decentralised energy system

I was going to put this in the indifferent pile, but it does look good. Possibly. Need more info about it.

Boost wages of 5.7m people earning less than minimum wage to £10 an hour by 2020
This could have been an indifferent one, or a good one for me. Min Wage is set to be £9 per hour by 2020 anyway. But, it is interesting how this could affect the economy. A 48 hour working week at £10 per hour is £25k a year. £25k a year, as the new effective minimum wage. Will this push the middle wages upwards.. If the economy improves, I think it would.

Deliver rail electrification "including in Wales and the South West".
Sure. Kind of bland, but good.

Indifferent:
Build over one million more homes, with at least half for social rent
I think I'd rather just increase the private sector houses being built to be honest, and reduce the housing cost over time in other ways. The two issues for me are; jealousy amongst the private renters, and neighbourhoods where lots of 'noisy' people in one place. This thread probably sums up my thoughts on it. That's not to say it couldn't be done right though.

Guarantee triple lock for pensioner incomes
This will make virtually no difference to individual pensioners, and cost a fortune. Sad as it is to say, our ageing population is causing a huge strain on the NHS, a huge strain in providing pensions for everyone, so increasing those pensions themselves is a triple cost. If it can be afforded, great. If not...

An end to zero-hours contracts to guarantee workers a "number of hours each week
In the retail sector, this would be a great thing. No reason for Sports Direct to be using zero hours contracts at all. In other sectors though, banning them would be madness, and turn us into France.

Labour would slap a levy of 2.5 per cent on earnings above £330,000 and of five per cent on pay above £500,000.
Not sure about this one. 50% income tax, 2% Employees National Insurance, 13.8% Employers National Insurance, and now a 5% Levy... That's not to say I'm against the idea, but I would want to see caution.

Replace water system with a network of regional publicly-owned water companies
Why?

Reverse the privatisation of Royal Mail "at the earliest opportunity"
Why? I wasn't for RM to be privatised, but there is plenty of competition here, and traditional Letters will disappear over time, in favour of parcels. Even HMRC uses TNT and similar.

Create at least one publicly-owned energy company in every region of the UK, with public control of the transmission and distribution grids
Why?

Increase corporation tax to 26%
I think the affect on this by the right has been massively oversold. We would be middling in Europe for corporation tax, and still the lowest in the G7. But - raising corporation tax does tend to persuade companies to leave, and could actually *possibly* cause corporation tax rates to decrease. I'd put it back to 20%

£6.5bn from tax avoidance programme
The annual tax avoidance pledge.

Create a National Transformation Fund that will invest £250bn over 10 years in upgrading the economy
What does this mean? How will this work?

A National Investment Bank as part of a plan to provide £250bn of lending power over the next decade for infrastructure
Again, what does this mean?

Reinstate the lower small-business corporation tax rate
I don't think this will make any difference. Or only affect a few. Maybe it will help turn us into a German "small and medium sized business power house, but I doubt it. Also open to abuse.

Introduce four extra public holidays each year to mark national patron saints' days
Probably a good thing, but I'd rather have them on Monday or Friday

"Clamp down on bogus self-employment" and extend rights of employees to all workers - including shared parental pay
Don't know how this would work, and actually already happens.

Guarantee trade unions a right to access workplaces
Trade Unions in the manifesto

End the public sector pay cap
Highly depends where we are talking. NHS obviously yes.

Enforce all workers' rights to trade union representation at work
We already have this, which is why it says enforce... but I couldn't say if it's a problem or not.

Shifting the burden of proof, so the law assumes a worker is an employee unless the employer can prove otherwise.
Well, I can see how this would be abused. Not saying it's a good idea or not.

Devolve responsibility for skills to city regions or devolved administrations
How does this square with the National Education Service?

Reinstate housing benefit for under-21s
I think this might end up as a bad thing.

Guarantee state pension triple lock, as well as the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes
Again, aging population that have had all the advantages. If we can afford it, great.

Introduce an immediate emergency energy price cap to ensure the average dual fuel household energy bill remains below £1,000 per year
Won't work in the long term, without reforming the energy market.

A national review of local pubs to examine the causes for their large-scale demise, as well as establishing a joint taskforce that will consider future sustainability.
Pointless. Waste of money.

Establish a Scottish Investment Bank, with £20bn for local projects and Scotland's small businesses, creating work and stimulating the economy
I still don't understand what this is.

Build on the Development Bank of Wales using more than £10bn from Labour's new National Investment Bank
And again.
Dislike:
Repeal the Trade Union Act and roll out sectoral collective bargaining, whereby industries can negotiate agreement as a whole
Too much of a stick to beat Labour with. In the modern days of Health and Safety, is this necessary? Several European countries have this, and it doesnt seem to hold them back, and add complexity to legislation.

Use public spending power to drive up standards, including only awarding public contracts to companies which recognise trade unions.
Sounds like something written by a trade union.

The Missing

- Reform the House of Lords

- Firm commitment to stay in the Single Market

- Legalise Weed

- Change Drug Policy

- Global Britain should negotiate free trade deals and borders to other Western countries.

- Commitments to fight Terrorism, and what methods and tools we give our police

There is a lot to like in the Manifesto, which is I guess why they did so well since launching it. I think the IFS criticism of the potential tax revenue increases is valid however. In some places, I don't think it goes far enough, or lacks details.
 
Raising corporation tax is socially justified and a fair tax, it will make it difficult for certain businesses but ultimately it is for the greater good.

I don't see how a Tory led hard brexit is benefitting anyone, we will all suffer from it.

And what 'certain business's' are these?
 
Still doesn't seem to have filtered through that we're getting a hard brexit whatever happens now.
 
Raising corporation tax is socially justified and a fair tax, it will make it difficult for certain businesses but ultimately it is for the greater good.

I don't see how a Tory led hard brexit is benefitting anyone, we will all suffer from it.
I don't see how corporation tax can make anything "difficult for businesses" given that it's a tax on profits which can reclaimed years later.
 
So what happens when the the corporates/wealthy subsequently close down or relocate and lay staff off?

Im confused did they disappear the last time it was at that rate? Did they only come back when the tories last reduced it?
 
What, why?
Whatever deal we end up with is going to be shit with free movement completely off the table. Doesn't need a crash into WTO to be hard.
 
That would have to be a bloody quick shuttle.
Heathrow and Gatwick are seperated by 25 miles, albeit 25 miles with bodies of water, areas of outstanding natural beauty, hills, roads, towns and so on

8CKQQv0.png

25 miles in 15 minutes is 100 miles per hour, average. The fastest speed a London Underground train goes is the Metropolitan line at 60 miles per hour. However, the Eurotunnel top speed is over 180 miles per hour, and it could be argued that that was more directly comparable.

Maybe 15 minutes is unrealistic, but it's not in the realms of science fiction. The question is paying for it.
 
Whatever deal we end up with is going to be shit with free movement completely off the table. Doesn't need a crash into WTO to be hard.
Yeah I see what you are saying.
 
I was in the heart of the enemy today. :lol:

(News international building - alas nothing to do with any of the Murdoch businesses)
 
Real chance Farron loses his seat. Dear oh dear. One to watch on the night, if we've already been dis'may'ed by the exit poll. Might bring a chuckle.
 
Real chance Farron loses his seat. Dear oh dear. One to watch on the night, if we've already been dis'may'ed by the exit poll. Might bring a chuckle.

Angus Robertson too, that would be a loss. Farron would not....
 
Angus Robertson too, that would be a loss. Farron would not....
Yeah, I would be genuinely sad if he went but it's looking likely now Labour are backing the Tories in his seat.
 
Heathrow and Gatwick are seperated by 25 miles, albeit 25 miles with bodies of water, areas of outstanding natural beauty, hills, roads, towns and so on

8CKQQv0.png

25 miles in 15 minutes is 100 miles per hour, average. The fastest speed a London Underground train goes is the Metropolitan line at 60 miles per hour. However, the Eurotunnel top speed is over 180 miles per hour, and it could be argued that that was more directly comparable.

Maybe 15 minutes is unrealistic, but it's not in the realms of science fiction. The question is paying for it.

The Shanghai Maglev does 20 miles in 8 minutes. It's definitely possible but that cost over $1 billion in a country that doesn't have to worry about existing residents in the way and it has still has never made a cent in profit.

Still, you'd hope the technology has come on since that was built.
 
Labour accuses Tories of fake news over video of Corbyn IRA comments

Guardian said:
The attack ad includes a clip from Corbyn’s appearance on Sky News last month when interviewer Sophy Ridge asked whether he could “condemn unequivocally the IRA”. The Labour leader said: “Look, bombing is wrong, all bombing is wrong, of course I condemn it.” Ridge responded: “But you’re condemning all bombing, can you condemn the IRA without equating it to.” Corbyn said: “No.”

The clip was cut off there but the full quote was: “No, I think what you have to say is all bombing has to be condemned and you have to bring about a peace process. Listen, in the 1980s Britain was looking for a military solution, it clearly was never going to work. Ask anyone in the British army at the time … I condemn all the bombing by the loyalists and the IRA.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...f-fake-news-over-video-of-corbyn-ira-comments
 
Just remembered that the boundary review would be enacted between this election and next.
 
Just remembered that the boundary review would be enacted between this election and next.
Not a small one on the list of reasons it will be rather funny if the Tories lose their majority calling an election they didn't need to.
 
I still don't think social media momentum and enthusiasm can really touch rabid, right-wing fearmongering in the tabloid press in terms of influence on an election. Corbyn's getting the favourable Twitter coverage but is still being hammered daily in outlets proven far more likely to be of influence to people proven to actually vote in greater numbers.

I do worry (maybe slight exaggeration) that the left have submerged themselves in the echo chamber of social media ignoring the rather large constituency of blue-rinsers who've never posted a hashtag but will be turning up in far great numbers next Thursday. With #Milifandom, there seems to be a pattern of assuming a direct conflation between social media buzz and reality.

One Daily Mail front page packs more clout than for May than a week of unflattering Tweets. If this is a defeat for Labour it's the second election in a row where it'll be proven that social media's impact, and what it tells you about the mood of the country, is limited and that a proper press strategy is needed.
I don't think that middle paragraph can be considered a controversial view? I'd assume that that's what most people in here are expecting.
 
If jezz looses this, which he will, it will prove once and for all that the British are bat shit crazy

If I recall correctly, you were one of those posters who would lament how supposedly weak and unelectable he was throughout the course of this thread.