General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
The annual allowance for pension contributions is capped at £40k, not meaning to be a pedant.
Unless you earn over £150k, in which case it's tapered away. If you earn £210k the most you can pay into a pension is £10k.
 
Thats not really the issue here though. I agree he sounds well off enough to be a natural Tory voter and I can understand not wanting to vote against your own interests.

You can do that without talking absolute bollocks and pretending like you haven't come from one of the most privileged backgrounds it's possible to have. Sammsky's had a head start in life that others can only dream of and to act like the issue is that everyone else is lazy is downright insulting.

Paid for by my mother and father working 14 hours a day in a new country they did not properly understand. Ive just carried on doing the same. Anyone can do it
 
Just a reminder, it was 73% when Thatcher was in office. It was over 80% during the previous tory government of Ted Heath.

We do not have high taxes.
Which again was a bit silly.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26327114

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/personal-income-tax-rate

5Id8L82.png
1cuUoYD.png
 
I'm an unemployed scrounger, bleeding the state dry, pretending to be too ill to work. Currently waiting for a letter that can turn up at any time that summons me to lengthy questioning on extremely personal matters followed by a physical examination. After that, I wait for a letter that can turn up at any time that tells me whether I am deemed sufficiently ill to be deserving of financial support, or whether my benefits will be stopped.
!

Im sorry to hear this. I remember when there was a similar discussion on the caf a good few years ago you were in a similar situation.

But you have to understand the state has to do these checks to weed out the non genuine folk who prefer not to work. I dont think you should feel bitter over the process
 
Well then they should work harder like everybody else.

I'm a 2nd generation immigrant. My parents arrived with nothing. ZILCH. LIKE ABSOLUTLY NOTHING And yet in one generation they and their 5 kids became educated, wealthy and all work in professional upper middle class jobs. Through hard work.

As a family, we've taken very little support from the state except opportunities. I'm thankful to the United Kingdom for changing my family's life experience with opportunity. The opportunity is there for everyone if you work hard.

Why cant other do this?? Why should I prop them up, esp when they fecked us all by voting to leave the EU?

Now then. How did they become educated?

My Mum had 4 kids by 23 and no job. My Dad left and she was borrowing money from her Mum to put food on the table, things were really bad.

A Labour government put her through University with grant after grant and bursary after bursary. She has earned £45k+ for 10+ years now, and if you'd have asked anyone in our street as kids if our family would achieve anything of the sort you'd have been laughed at. She is a staunch Labour supporter and wants other people to be given the same opportunity and not treated like shit due to being a victim of circumstance or whatever. Myself and my sister both earn similar money now due to the platform given to my Mum and the breathing space her wage allowed us. We all contribute enormously to the economy and have for years, and whilst £45k might be pittance down South, in a Northern town it's absolutely plenty and just because of this money we don't now think it's okay to abandon what Labour stands for...
 
If everyone is going to lay into Sammsky for being 'selfish', we might as well pull up Ken on this sort of bullshit. Yes, he's not suffering, so let's tax him more sounds the best way to go about it.

Look, tax is not about punishing people. We've allowed ourselves as a country to slide towards a right wing economic policy where companies and rich individuals are allowed to greatly enrich themselves at the expense of the normal working people. It's stupid and short sighted greed, because if the working and middle classes are prosperous they fuel growth in the economy which allows everyone to become better off. Tax is just a tool that allows us to start that rebalancing. There are many other things that need to be done.
 
Apologies, I was just lying cause I was confused as to why you asked. I feel bad now you've responded rather politely.

I'm an unemployed scrounger, bleeding the state dry, pretending to be too ill to work. Currently waiting for a letter that can turn up at any time that summons me to lengthy questioning on extremely personal matters followed by a physical examination. After that, I wait for a letter that can turn up at any time that tells me whether I am deemed sufficiently ill to be deserving of financial support, or whether my benefits will be stopped.

Livin' the life, at sammsky's expense, yo!

Hey, you can think of yourself living off my taxes instead, and I say good luck with it all.

The idea stated in this thread everyone can be wealthy and successful is of course nonsense, we do not live in a meritocracy.

Also, the basic premise of capitalism requires a pool of available labour at all times, it cannot work without them, it's how it keeps wages in check. Thus a capitalist moaning about the unemployed is just ridiculous, or someone who has no understanding of the system that makes them wealthy in the first place. The system is designed to create the unemployed. I'd rather they had a half decent life myself instead of begrudging them a fecking roof over their heads.
 
Apologies, I was just lying cause I was confused as to why you asked. I feel bad now you've responded rather politely.

I'm an unemployed scrounger, bleeding the state dry, pretending to be too ill to work. Currently waiting for a letter that can turn up at any time that summons me to lengthy questioning on extremely personal matters followed by a physical examination. After that, I wait for a letter that can turn up at any time that tells me whether I am deemed sufficiently ill to be deserving of financial support, or whether my benefits will be stopped.

Livin' the life, at sammsky's expense, yo!

I had only asked what you do to understand a hypothetical tax rate you will be comfortable with based on your income. It will be really interesting to hear your views when you get a job and forced to pay taxes. I've supported higher taxes when I didn't have work and supported lower taxes after I got work. Now after nearly 15 years of work, I've mellowed down to see the benefits of tax, but your changing views based on your income was an eye opener for me. I'm not saying everyone will be selfish like me though.

Good luck with your health and if I'm right, you are a young voter and I hope you get out to vote.
 
Im sorry to hear this. I remember when there was a similar discussion on the caf a good few years ago you were in a similar situation.

But you have to understand the state has to do these checks to weed out the non genuine folk who prefer not to work. I dont think you should feel bitter over the process
Not really. I don't think anything this invasive is required. I really don't believe there is a significant amount of people claiming incapacity as a lifestyle choice. Just a small number who it's not worth hurting the majority of genuine people to weed out.

It's not remotely preferable to working, for most.
 
I'm sorry to hear this. I remember when there was a similar discussion on the caf a good few years ago you were in a similar situation. But you have to understand the state has to do these checks to weed out the non genuine folk who prefer not to work. I dont think you should feel bitter over the process
Yeah DiseaseOfTheAge, don't feel bitter over the process that sees over half of appeals being successful, it weeds out the non-genuine folk. Admittedly it also takes benefits off people who are later deemed unfit to work by the appeals process and a number of those have died in the time it takes for that decision to be made but don't be bitter, because you're still here to tell the tale.

Quite amusing that when faced with someone in that situation, those who usually scream 'scroungers' suddenly believe that they're talking to one of the genuine ones without question.
 
Btw, didn't May just a few weeks ago lecture Sturgeon about how a ref vote would be unnecessarily divisive at a time when we 'all need to come together'? Hypocritical cow.
 
Well no because its progressive i dont pay 40% on everything so its less. Your criteria is also one that assumes its my money in the first place, i dont really see it that way.

Anyone complaining about paying 45% on earnings above the threshold (150k is it?) can get fecked. No one earns a living in isolation from the rest of us or society, all money is in circulation you've just absorbed some of it yourself.
Indeed, I'm really only talking about each additional pound earned here, not the full amount.
The annual allowance for pension contributions is capped at £40k, not meaning to be a pedant.
Sorry, maybe I was not clear.

The 98% I am referring to is... A higher rate tax payer get charged 40% income tax and 2% National Insurance (on each pound above £43k ish). But if he puts that money into a SIPP, he'll get the 40% tax back... so only charged 2% tax!

Lower rate tax payers get charged 20% income tax and 12% National Insurance (on each pound above £11.5k). If he put's the money into a SIPP, he'll get the 20% tax back, but not the 12% National Insurance!... so he get's charged more than the higher raters!

But you are right, pension contributions are capped.
 
Look, tax is not about punishing people. We've allowed ourselves as a country to slide towards a right wing economic policy where companies and rich individuals are allowed to greatly enrich themselves at the expense of the normal working people. It's stupid and short sighted greed, because if the working and middle classes are prosperous they fuel growth in the economy which allows everyone to become better off. Tax is just a tool that allows us to start that rebalancing. There are many other things that need to be done.

Your construct is based on the assumption that only traditionally rich people and the elite ever get rich. Sorry, I think that taxing the wealthy at 50% or 60% because they can afford and then redistribute the wealth is entirely stupid'.
 
I'd pay 2p more in the same scenario, 5p if the extra money was ring-fenced for education. Although I'd want guarantees that it was spent wisely. Which is the real rub here. Paying the government the guts of half your salary gets harder and harder to put up with the more you learn about how incredibly badly run the public sector is. Unfortunately, I don't know what the solution is. I suspect it isn't political.
That's the problem. Even the benefits system seems overly generous to some while brutal to others. All badly run and inconsistent. Tbf, people harp on about the private sector being more lean and efficient, but plenty of the companies I've worked at were badly run in a number of ways too.
 
Quite amusing that when faced with someone in that situation, those who usually scream 'scroungers' suddenly believe that they're talking to one of the genuine ones without question.
I genuinely think this is because I can spell.

if i rote les wel, I suspect I might fit their image of a scrounger a bit better.
 
Unless you earn over £150k, in which case it's tapered away. If you earn £210k the most you can pay into a pension is £10k.
Ah, yep, not a worry most of us have though. I've been out tax nerded!
 
Paid for by my mother and father working 14 hours a day in a new country they did not properly understand. Ive just carried on doing the same. Anyone can do it

If they had the others and fathers working 14 hrs a day. Many don't.
 
It says a 2013 survey found Britons believe almost a quarter, 24 per cent, of all benefits were claimed fraudulently, 34 times greater than the official 0.7 per cent estimate.

There's a massive disconnect between reality and people's perceptions driven by propaganda.
 
Indeed, I'm really only talking about each additional pound earned here, not the full amount.

Sorry, maybe I was not clear.

The 98% I am referring to is... A higher rate tax payer get charged 40% income tax and 2% National Insurance (on each pound above £43k ish). But if he puts that money into a SIPP, he'll get the 40% tax back... so only charged 2% tax!

Lower rate tax payers get charged 20% income tax and 12% National Insurance (on each pound above £11.5k). If he put's the money into a SIPP, he'll get the 20% tax back, but not the 12% National Insurance!... so he get's charged more than the higher raters!

But you are right, pension contributions are capped.
Is that right? Been years since I've had to write about pensions.
 
Paid for by my mother and father working 14 hours a day in a new country they did not properly understand. Ive just carried on doing the same. Anyone can do it

No one's saying you or they don't work hard. Just that millions others work similarly hard just to scrape by.
 
Ah, yep, not a worry most of us have though. I've been out tax nerded!
:lol: I have to stop myself picking up on tax things in the CE far too often, in this case I thought you might have forgotten and I wouldn't want you over contributing, 'cos I know you make the big bucks!
 
If they had the others and fathers working 14 hrs a day. Many don't.
Thats unfortunate but seriously why is that my problem? Labour voters like me pay top level tax as it is to compensate for that. Why should we pay even more so Corbyn can go on yet another labour opening spree?
 
Quite amusing that when faced with someone in that situation, those who usually scream 'scroungers' suddenly believe that they're talking to one of the genuine ones without question.

Obviously I cant be sure

But from what little I know about DOTA he seems a genuine chap
 
That's the problem. Even the benefits system seems overly generous to some while brutal to others. All badly run and inconsistent. Tbf, people harp on about the private sector being more lean and efficient, but plenty of the companies I've worked at were badly run in a number of ways too.

Atos previously and capita now are making millions out of assessments. Brought in by blairs lot atos were actually banned from operating their business in several US states, described in court as running 'disability denial factories', but they still employed these people.

80% of their decisions are overturned, they get a bonus for every person they take off benefits. It is not returned when the desicion gets overturned. That is where the money is really going.

To capita, to atos, to virgin. In fact, richard branson is currently suing the tax payer for compensation because he did not get a government contract he wanted.
 
Thats unfortunate but seriously why is that my problem? Labour voters like me pay top level tax as it is to compensate for that. Why should we pay even more so Corbyn can go on yet another labour opening spree?


 
Thing about mocking someone for voting out of self-interest is that most people vote out of self-interest. I'm worried that the response to this seems to be "well then you are a Tory". That will not end well.

To be fair, the Tories:

- Raised the Personal Allowance to £11.5k (a Lib Dem policy) taking millions of poor and working class people out of the first income tax rate altogether.
- Introduced the National Living Wage, now at £7.50 per hour, and will likely rise to nearly £10 by 2020. (Two Labour Policies)
- Re-introduced vocational qualifications after Labour (the party of the working class) decided that working class jobs shouldn't be taught in school.
- Have said they are scrapping Tenancy fees. (A labour policy)
- Are building lots of houses (although still slower than the rate of building in the 60's to 80's)
- Gave everyone the opportunity to vote for Brexit.

If you are a low-earning working class voter, who has seen Eastern Europeans come in and do the same job you do for less, why would you vote Labour?
Really the big question right now. Don't think any of them can counteract the huge leads the Tories have on leadership and the economy, but you can't predict anything with certainty these days.
Vote Green. We mean well.
There's a good slogan.
 
Indeed, I'm really only talking about each additional pound earned here, not the full amount.

Sorry, maybe I was not clear.

The 98% I am referring to is... A higher rate tax payer get charged 40% income tax and 2% National Insurance (on each pound above £43k ish). But if he puts that money into a SIPP, he'll get the 40% tax back... so only charged 2% tax!

Lower rate tax payers get charged 20% income tax and 12% National Insurance (on each pound above £11.5k). If he put's the money into a SIPP, he'll get the 20% tax back, but not the 12% National Insurance!... so he get's charged more than the higher raters!

But you are right, pension contributions are capped.
I actually think, people earning the £40k-£50k region pay the least tax. Rich enough to stick anything above £40k into your pension to stay as a low-rater. And putting £10k a year into your pension over 30 years will turn into around £1m using 6.5% above inflation.

25% tax free = £250k tax free
6% on the remainder = £40k a year, about the lower tax band rate

Unless you earn over £150k, in which case it's tapered away. If you earn £210k the most you can pay into a pension is £10k.
Really... blimey. Weird rules.
 
Last edited:
Your construct is based on the assumption that only traditionally rich people and the elite ever get rich. Sorry, I think that taxing the wealthy at 50% or 60% because they can afford and then redistribute the wealth is entirely stupid'.

That's because you listen to stupid Tory bullshit about 'redistributing wealth' as if some cnut is going around robbing cash out their pockets to hand to poor folk. Two things, 1) its about creating infrastructure, regulation and opportunity for poor people to enrich themselves by being given a fair chance and equal opportunities in life. It's not handing them free money. 2) The rich only become rich because of the opportunities they had available thanks to the country they live in. The country allowed them to enrich themselves, its not like the country is some pickpocket stealing the money the poor dears made all on their own. That's not how this works.
 
That's the problem. Even the benefits system seems overly generous to some while brutal to others. All badly run and inconsistent. Tbf, people harp on about the private sector being more lean and efficient, but plenty of the companies I've worked at were badly run in a number of ways too.

Yeah, that's true too. Although if you're a customer of the private sector you should (at least, theoretically) be able to choose not to give your money to a company that gives you a poor return. The frustration for top rate tax-payers is that you've no choice but to see your hard-earned pissed up against a wall.

On balance, I'm ok with this. I can't think of a better solution and want to live in a society that cares for its disadvantaged. Every now and then, though, I have a Tory moment and feel the red mist descend when I find out about yet another fecking colossal waste of my money and read left-leaning think-pieces (or statements from Corbyn) about how the solution is to screw even more cash out of me.
 
No one's saying you or they don't work hard. Just that millions others work similarly hard just to scrape by.
We are back to the heart of the BrExit immigrant debate who are willing to work harder, but older born natives think they have a divine right to get the same with less.

I dont think I was born intellectually gifted. Maybe all people should have studied 4 hours every night after school, get qualifications and get good employment. Its possible for all.

Perhaps all my critics should focus it towards the Labour party. This is why they are currently unelectable and will lose millions of voters like me in this next election due to CorbynOmics.
 
Last edited:
If they had the others and fathers working 14 hrs a day. Many don't.

In addition to the fact that whilst I only work a shocking 8 hours a day, I decided long ago that I was going to be there for every bath time and bed time i could be for my kids. My dad worked every hour given to him for a good few years of my childhood. it meant I was comfortable financially, but I always wished my dad was around more to take me to football training more.

It's a balance at the end of the day for me.
 
If after all this time you guys vote significantly for a pro-brexit party then you can have no complaints whatever happens.