General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
Are we really back to arguing that an Eagle, Owen Smith, or Liz Kenndal Labour with a 'centre' manifesto would have swept the election?
This argument isn't going to cut it if Labour fall to their worst level since the 30s next month.
 
Possibly someone a bit more charismatic than that lot might have. But I'd also argue that someone more popular than Corbyn could win with his manifesto also. It doesn't really matter too much to many people anymore, the average person goes to the booth and thinks "that May lady seems sensible and nice" or "that Corbyn is a right ruffian and is clueless". All about what the papers are telling them.

But that's exactly why another MP with Corbyn's manifesto would also lose... because they'd have the same media discrediting them and doing whatever they can to ensure that individual doesn't get into power. It's his policy, not his personality that makes him unelectable. Until the day comes where the media doesn't have the same influence and power over the electorate, it will be the same. Corbyn does come with baggage, but I think we're kidding ourselves if we think a Dan Jarvis or Chuka Umunna would win with the same media backlash.
 
This argument isn't going to cut it if Labour fall to their worst level since the 30s next month.

I'm certainly not saying a safer no frills manifesto wouldn't be less of a risk. It wouldn't win though.

Sky seem kind of positive on the manifesto so far. Fingers crossed no gaffes in it
 
Shelagh Fogarty spent a good portion of her show yesterday, trying to downplay Corbyn's support for the IRA. Worse still, the good and honest man from Islington repeated the gross error two decades later; Stop the War gave tacit support to Iraqi terrorist organisations, killers of their own compatriots and British citizens alike. You can throw an extra 2, 3, 4 billion at the NHS, but these character questions are going to be huge problems for the voter.



On to other news: i gather that we are now renationalising the water industry too? This one i am actually more open to, only not as part of this massive programme of state buyouts proposed by Labour.
 
But that's exactly why another MP with Corbyn's manifesto would also lose... because they'd have the same media discrediting them and doing whatever they can to ensure that individual doesn't get into power. It's his policy, not his personality that makes him unelectable. Until the day comes where the media doesn't have the same influence and power over the electorate, it will be the same. Corbyn does come with baggage, but I think we're kidding ourselves if we think a Dan Jarvis or Chuka Umunna would win with the same media backlash.

I think with Corbyn it's definitely his demeanour and public perception that's the real issue. The same manifesto with someone like Chuka Umunna leading the party would make a lot more people think about their vote, probably still a way off winning an election but not the forgone conclusion that it is right now.
 
If you want to launch an investment manifesto, Bradford is certainly a good example of where its needed.
 
I still think the scrapping of tuition fees is a huge mistake. Not worthwhile and its certainly not progressive
 
I think with Corbyn it's definitely his demeanour and public perception that's the real issue. The same manifesto with someone like Chuka Umunna leading the party would make a lot more people think about their vote, probably still a way off winning an election but not the forgone conclusion that it is right now.

The public perception of Corbyn has largely been created by the media... they'd do the same to another Labour leader with left-wing policy. A late change of leader a few months ago would only have helped in the sense that the media wouldn't have had 2 years to do their damage like they've had with Corbyn.
 
The public perception of Corbyn has largely been created by the media... they'd do the same to another Labour leader with left-wing policy. A late change of leader a few months ago would only have helped in the sense that the media wouldn't have had 2 years to do their damage like they've had with Corbyn.

There's so much ammunition with Corbyn though, he's like a dream for the right wing press.
 
There's so much ammunition with Corbyn though, he's like a dream for the right wing press.

Agree and as I said, he does come with baggage and I'd have backed a more electable Labour leader for that reason alone (although Eagle and Smith were terrible choices). My frustration is what is happening in this country... food bank usage rocketing, the NHS struggling massively... yet the media will largely give Theresa May and the Government a free pass whilst Corbyn gets dirt thrown at him for meetings he had 20 years ago. Yet people lap it up and t's ridiculous.
 
Ah they've sneaked an extensed maternity leave into the manifesto, 52 weeks. Thats a vote winner
 
There's so much ammunition with Corbyn though, he's like a dream for the right wing press.
Yup. What I find to be the biggest disconnect is in how is supporters see Jeremy as a 'man of the people' compared to more of the general public's view of him as an out of touch 'Islington luvvie duvvie lefty'. We'll find out more at the election but that isn't something that's going to change, if it doesn't in the next three weeks. He's as much of a career politician as anyone, and people see him that way.
 
Yup. What I find to be the biggest disconnect is in how is supporters see Jeremy as a 'man of the people' compared to more of the general public's view of him as an out of touch 'Islington luvvie duvvie lefty'. We'll find out more at the election but that isn't something that's going to change, if it doesn't in the next three weeks. He's as much of a career politician as anyone, and people see him that way.

He's always polled as 'honest' and thats not a small thing for a politician tbf
 
If they were earning less than the existing minimum wage, why won't they be doing so with the new one?
 
What do we make on the Tories pledge for employee rights in their manifesto?

Committing to keeping employee rights exactly the same as they are in the EU once we leave is a big one, if they keep to it and the pledge is a straight one.
 
What do we make on the Tories pledge for employee rights in their manifesto?

Committing to keeping employee rights exactly the same as they are in the EU once we leave is a big one, if they keep to it and the pledge is a straight one.

Great. Except they've put the fees up for tribunals, so the average worker can't afford to enforce the law
 
A question from communists on what to do about the shockingly biased media :lol:
 
I think with Corbyn it's definitely his demeanour and public perception that's the real issue. The same manifesto with someone like Chuka Umunna leading the party would make a lot more people think about their vote, probably still a way off winning an election but not the forgone conclusion that it is right now.

Demeanour, but also a perception of capability, rightly or wrongly. With Attlee, Wilson, Brown their opponents obviously disagreed with their objectives, but did acknowledge that they were clever and capable people. Corbyn and his team have a lot of work to do in comparison.
 
There's so much ammunition with Corbyn though, he's like a dream for the right wing press.

Yep, that's the major problem. It's all well and good complaining about how the press is treating you, but when you've got some previous associations perceived as dodgy, a Shadow Chancellor who's talked about honouring the IRA, and Diane Abbott in...well, any position at all, then you're setting yourself up for failure. Even more so when you send Abbott onto a talk show and she's unable to present the costs to core parts of the manifesto.
 
Demeanour, but also a perception of capability, rightly or wrongly. With Attlee, Wilson, Brown their opponents obviously disagreed with their objectives, but did acknowledge that they were clever and capable people. Corbyn and his team have a lot of work to do in comparison.
Spot on - Brexit being the prime example.
 
Decent but not spectacular speech i think. Can see the attack lines coming on nationalisation costings. Which ever way you look it at the detail on the costings is impressive, a lesson learnt from Eds manifesto.

Can we just get promote Sarah Champion and demote Abbot please
 
Last edited:
C_5tblZW0AAhWvJ.jpg:large
 
Am I reading right that they haven't put any of the renationalisations into the costings?
 
Am I reading right that they haven't put any of the renationalisations into the costings?
Er, what's the combined market cap of the power utilities?