L1nk
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2017
- Messages
- 5,137
...why? You just admitted he was right so what's the issueArsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
...why? You just admitted he was right so what's the issueArsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
Not his fault were an embarrassment and he's right.Arsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
Arsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
You failed to hear him up City’s arse from the first minute?...why? You just admitted he was right so what's the issue
It's a bit weird how the caf attacks him no matter what.Bang on as always, but easy target for the caf regulars.
I had no issue with him calling out United's ineptitude, but he's a real drama queen when it comes to assessing our challenges, and seems to apply a harsher standard than he would for others. The same guy who said Mane's elbow on Azpi recently wasn't a red card, was today insisting that Maguire should have been sent off for a regulation yellow.
You failed to hear him up City’s arse from the first minute?
What do you want him to be? Up United's ass? We are trash and they are really good. I can hate City as much as the next person but recognise they are absolutely leagues above us and play fantastic football, it's not betrayal or arseholeness it's being grounded in reality. We are an appallingly bad football side and him as a pundit is fawning over them because they play amazing football. Perhaps instead of pointing anger towards Neville, you should direct it towards the owners who have left us and this squad in such a dilapidated state that City look like footballing gods compared to us.You failed to hear him up City’s arse from the first minute?
“He’s right but I don’t like it so he’s an arsehole too”Arsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
I think his confidence is so shot to shit that he’s trying to find literally anything to help him improveHe has the habit of bigging up Rashford out of nowhere. Marcus will be shocking for a long time then, out of the blue, he’ll be shocked that Marcus is on the bench and every little run is highlighted in a positive sense
Says Rangnick was tactically showing off. Then when he put on Rashford and Lingard and went more traditional it became worse. Pretty glaring contradiction.
Those first 25-30 minutes or whatever it was, was the first time I've seen this team play progressive football against a progressive side in about a decade. If he (or another progressive manager) can build a side fit for purpose, we can actually start to enjoy football again.
This makes a lot of senseArsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
You failed to hear him up City’s arse from the first minute?
What annoys me about Neville is the over compensation he is trying to be unbiased and in doing so is much harder on Utd. He constantly gives the English players greater benefit of the doubt and moans about Bruno mosning when he should be agreeing and highlighting how the ref has just allowed a challenge at the other end but once it is Fernandes he has to be braver or stop moaning.No I didnt hear that, what did he say?
What annoys me about Neville is the over compensation he is trying to be unbiased and in doing so is much harder on Utd. He constantly gives the English players greater benefit of the doubt and moans about Bruno mosning when he should be agreeing and highlighting how the ref has just allowed a challenge at the other end but once it is Fernandes he has to be braver or stop moaning.
He needs to stop listening to Tyler and his crap, at least Carragher gives his opinion and disagrees with the has been geriatric who just wants a sound bite.
I don't mind criticism of utd, that is why most of us come here to post our thoughts but, maybe look at the other faults and failings and call out some of your friends and contacts in the club like Maguire, he criticised every other defender but the one who let the ball go through his legs for the first goal.
He has the habit of bigging up Rashford out of nowhere. Marcus will be shocking for a long time then, out of the blue, he’ll be shocked that Marcus is on the bench and every little run is highlighted in a positive sense
Nope, it was up until he actually came on and made a non inpact on the game. Funnily enough he showed why he is a sub.Thats the opposite of what he said today though?
Arsehole. Says we were an embarrassment which we were. But maybe he should take a look at himself.
Beans means HeinzMaybe in Heinzesight that wasn’t such a good idea to post that, looks rather silly.
He said he was shite when he came onHe has the habit of bigging up Rashford out of nowhere. Marcus will be shocking for a long time then, out of the blue, he’ll be shocked that Marcus is on the bench and every little run is highlighted in a positive sense
A million housewives say so every dayBeans means Heinz
Short term fix. A manager thatl only stay a season or 2. What's contes longest tenure? Hes already spoke about leaving spurs"We tried the Mourinho route" i.e. we should no longer aim for top managers?
57 different ways apparentlyA million housewives say so every day
I had no issue with him calling out United's ineptitude, but he's a real drama queen when it comes to assessing our challenges, and seems to apply a harsher standard than he would for others. The same guy who said Mane's elbow on Azpi recently wasn't a red card, was today insisting that Maguire should have been sent off for a regulation yellow.
Exactly my thought on the game, which is why I’m not that pissed off at the second half/result. There is small light at the end of the tunnel.Says Rangnick was tactically showing off. Then when he put on Rashford and Lingard and went more traditional it became worse. Pretty glaring contradiction.
Those first 25-30 minutes or whatever it was, was the first time I've seen this team play progressive football against a progressive side in about a decade. If he (or another progressive manager) can build a side fit for purpose, we can actually start to enjoy football again.
Says Rangnick was tactically showing off. Then when he put on Rashford and Lingard and went more traditional it became worse. Pretty glaring contradiction.
Those first 25-30 minutes or whatever it was, was the first time I've seen this team play progressive football against a progressive side in about a decade. If he (or another progressive manager) can build a side fit for purpose, we can actually start to enjoy football again.
Nope, it was up until he actually came on and made a non inpact on the game. Funnily enough he showed why he is a sub.
We absolutely battered City in the same fixture a few years back? We were 2 up in 30 minutes.
That was a counter attacking display in that first 30 mins. It wasn’t fluid or progressive like the first 30 mins today.We absolutely battered City first half in the same fixture a few years back? We were 2 up in 30 minutes.
A million housewives say so every day