Gary Neville - Pundit

I agree with him. This place is RAWK level weird when it comes to Neville.
He was saying last week if we sign Kane we can get it 90-95 points (which would win the league most probably). We sign somebody better than Kane and now he doesn’t think we can challenge. I disagree with his initial assertion but his logic is odd at times.
 
He was saying last week if we sign Kane we can get it 90-95 points (which would win the league most probably). We sign somebody better than Kane and now he doesn’t think we can challenge. I disagree with his initial assertion but his logic is odd at times.

It is that I can't argue with. But his logic is RedCafe like in the way he doesn't want to believe too much and get hurt. He's naturally pessimistic, like many football fans. You could see how giddy he is over Ronaldo, but he's still cautious.
 
Deep down I think Neville knows but won't say is that he'd be a lot more confident about us winning the title if Tuchel or Pep were managing us instead of Ole. Even if we sign a midfielder I doubt Neville will change his tune.
 
Don't think there's anything subconscious about it. To win the title, Ole needs to get the better of 2 of the best managers in the last decade or so and the top 2 in the world atm along with a 3rd manager who's absolutely brilliant himself. This will be true of any league where Pep and Klopp moved. Managers there would suddenly be up against insane quality and having a squad as good as them is no longer enough.

Why do you think people don't realize this? Are there a good chunk of posters who think Ole is as good as Pep and Klopp?

No he's not but that's mitigated to some extent by the respective summers the three have had.

This summer our recruitment has been by far the best. As good as Klopp and Pep are it ultimately comes down to players and recruitment.

Klopp for instance has really got a job on. If he can win it again with pretty much the same team he's had for 3/4 years that would be some achievement. Maybe his best. He'd kill for our summer.

Ole not as good a manager but the resources he now has means he has to challenge.
 
Don't think there's anything subconscious about it. To win the title, Ole needs to get the better of 2 of the best managers in the last decade or so and the top 2 in the world atm along with a 3rd manager who's absolutely brilliant himself. This will be true of any league where Pep and Klopp moved. Managers there would suddenly be up against insane quality and having a squad as good as them is no longer enough.

Why do you think people don't realize this? Are there a good chunk of posters who think Ole is as good as Pep and Klopp?
He often beats Pep in head to heads. And that was with an inferior squad the last few seasons.
 
He didn't say anything wrong. If anything, Hasselbank looked stupid when the question got flipped to him
I agree with you, all three of them talking at him at the same time while he kept his composure and answered truthfully. Hasselbank stuttering and going on about mentality shows they agree with him but just winding up.
 
Just don't get what he said wrong...
City won easily last season and Chelsea won the CL he is right there. United of course should be challenging for titles this season though. Neville is entitled to his opinion and it could be the case here who knows.
 
Just don't get what he said wrong...
City won easily last season and Chelsea won the CL he is right there. United of course should be challenging for titles this season though. Neville is entitled to his opinion and it could be the case here who knows.
It’s cool to hate ex players is what I take from it
 
He was saying last week if we sign Kane we can get it 90-95 points (which would win the league most probably). We sign somebody better than Kane and now he doesn’t think we can challenge. I disagree with his initial assertion but his logic is odd at times.

It's not so much his logic, it's not wanting to have a go at a mate. Which I get. It's not like our national security depends on Gary Neville being objective. It's just a bloke talking about football. So if he's being a bit cute to protect a pal I can understand. We'd probably all do the same.
 
Once again, a very weird reaction to a perfectly reasonable point from Gary. He's not helped by the presenter and co-hosts either, 'why sign Ronaldo if it doesn't get you the title?', when he's literally just said he thinks it gives us a much better chance of winning it. Unlike Gary, I think we should back ourselves to finish ahead of Chelsea. The simple fact is that in terms of the title, we're up against the best ever Premier League side who have proven on more than one occasion to be capable of getting to 100 points(ish), while we've only ever once squeezed past 90. If they get to that points tally again, it will be extremely hard for us to beat them, and it's unlikely we will, even if Ronaldo should bring us closer to that level. Which is all Gary said.
 
Agree with what he said - I don’t think we’ll win it either

City walked it last year and we still didn’t fix the midfield

We didnt lose the title because of the midfield last year. We had way too many draws that a top striker (Ronaldo) should solve.

People under estimate what a 20-25 a season player brings to a team that already has good scorers throughout. Without Van Persie, we dont win our last title.

What Gary should have said is, “United probably wont win the title because Ole is the inferior manager out of the title challengers”.

Man for man, you would take more United players than Chelsea so I dont get this sudden bigging up of their squad.
 
He often beats Pep in head to heads. And that was with an inferior squad the last few seasons.
So? Do you think he's the better manager?
No he's not but that's mitigated to some extent by the respective summers the three have had.

This summer our recruitment has been by far the best. As good as Klopp and Pep are it ultimately comes down to players and recruitment.

Klopp for instance has really got a job on. If he can win it again with pretty much the same team he's had for 3/4 years that would be some achievement. Maybe his best. He'd kill for our summer.

Ole not as good a manager but the resources he now has means he has to challenge.
Sure and that's what Nev said?
 
I read this alot, and I don't know what it means - Levy is on record saying he won't sell to a domestic rival and he wouldn't even entertain offers of less than 160mm quid. What do you want us to do? Waste all summer with Levy for a player he won't at a price we won't conrtemplate. Your own club wouldn't go for Kane, who are you to say what United should have done? FFS
I think you need to understand why......, you realise Levy/Kane wouldnt have gone to Chelsea or done business with us anyway, it just doesnt happen. If you had gone in with 160, or a deal worth that right after the euros, youd have had a very good chance. And 160 for Kane is not that outrageous. City didnt get him because they pissed about, talking about him in public which is something levy doesnt like.

It makes much more sense. Kane arguably wins you the league, CR7 doesnt.
 
I think you need to understand why......, you realise Levy/Kane wouldnt have gone to Chelsea or done business with us anyway, it just doesnt happen. If you had gone in with 160, or a deal worth that right after the euros, youd have had a very good chance. And 160 for Kane is not that outrageous. City didnt get him because they pissed about, talking about him in public which is something levy doesnt like.

It makes much more sense. Kane arguably wins you the league, CR7 doesnt.

Kane is not, and has never been, a better player (or even striker) than Cristiano.

Saying Kane will win us the league and Cristiano won't, is not sensible.

If we don't win the league, it will be because of our midfield, or because City has another one of them 100 point seasons. Not because we chose Cristiano over Kane.
 
"Signing Ronaldo absolutely brings them closer to winning the title." He says it twice in a row. Would he be a better pundit in your eyes if he changed his predictions from City/Chelsea/United to United/City/Chelsea based on the Ronnie signing?
Sure. But at least City/United/Chelsea because Chelsea clearly doesn't have a squad as good as us right now. Also for those of you who claim people here jumping on him "didn't watch the video", might I point out thay other reporters/pundits in the video also literally laughed at him for his bullshit statement? It's not just us, he got laughed by his own colleagues because Neville himself doesn't believe we are still third favorites, he is just saying this so Ole isn't under pressure to deliver
 
So? Do you think he's the better manager?
Sure and that's what Nev said?

I think he said, when pushed, Ronaldo takes us closer. Not sure exactly what he means by that. Still in contention with a couple of weeks to go?

But I mean from a fans perspective, yeah we're up against Klopp and Pep. But I don't think they have an XI that's so amazing the best we can say is "we'll get a bit closer."

If it was a different manager I think Gary would be going in much stronger. He hasn't because Ole is his mate and I totally get that.

Hasselbank missed a trick when Gary flipped the question around. He should have said what he thinks. United should win it but won't because of the manager. Then put it back to Gary. Where as Gary wants to keep the discussion purely about the players.
 
Kane is not, and has never been, a better player (or even striker) than Cristiano.

Saying Kane will win us the league and Cristiano won't, is not sensible.

If we don't win the league, it will be because of our midfield, or because City has another one of them 100 point seasons. Not because we chose Cristiano over Kane.
I get your point, but i would be much more worried facing utd with Kane right now, than Cr7.
 
I get your point, but i would be much more worried facing utd with Kane right now, than Cr7
I think Kane would frustrate in the same way Rooney used to towards the end of his time at United. He'd spend far too much time playing deep and getting in the way of Fernandes.
 
It makes much more sense. Kane arguably wins you the league, CR7 doesnt.
Disagree completely. If you ignore age and just go for who's better for 1 season, it's Ronaldo hands down for me for any team in the world and even more so for a team like ours that has attackers (bar Cavani) who range from abysmal to average when it comes to movement and getting to the end of things and have top creators like Bruno and Pogba. I'd take Ronaldo staying in and around the box playing off the shoulder of the defensive line trying to get to the end of things to Kane dropping deep and getting in the way of Pogba + Bruno.
 
I think you need to understand why......, you realise Levy/Kane wouldnt have gone to Chelsea or done business with us anyway, it just doesnt happen. If you had gone in with 160, or a deal worth that right after the euros, youd have had a very good chance. And 160 for Kane is not that outrageous. City didnt get him because they pissed about, talking about him in public which is something levy doesnt like.

It makes much more sense. Kane arguably wins you the league, CR7 doesnt.

160m for Kane gets us no Varane and no Sancho and certainly no Ronaldo. And no, it doesn’t guarantee us the title, far from it. And I’d rather play it how we did.
 
We didnt lose the title because of the midfield last year. We had way too many draws that a top striker (Ronaldo) should solve.

People under estimate what a 20-25 a season player brings to a team that already has good scorers throughout. Without Van Persie, we dont win our last title.

What Gary should have said is, “United probably wont win the title because Ole is the inferior manager out of the title challengers”.

Man for man, you would take more United players than Chelsea so I dont get this sudden bigging up of their squad.

Why on earth would he say that? christ :lol:

he's playing down United's chances to keep the pressure off, there is nothing more to it
 
Don't think there's anything subconscious about it. To win the title, Ole needs to get the better of 2 of the best managers in the last decade or so and the top 2 in the world atm along with a 3rd manager who's absolutely brilliant himself. This will be true of any league where Pep and Klopp moved. Managers there would suddenly be up against insane quality and having a squad as good as them is no longer enough.

Why do you think people don't realize this? Are there a good chunk of posters who think Ole is as good as Pep and Klopp?

Then we should get someone who is as good or better than Pep and Klopp - unfortunately this is a ruthless business with little room for sentiment

But regardless, we won't lose the title in the direct matches vs Pep or Klopp. The title will be decided by the mistakes we make against the likes of Southampton and Wolves. If Ole has vastly greater resources and can't even get the better of Hassenhuttl etc, what's the excuse then?
 
Then we should get someone who is as good or better than Pep and Klopp - unfortunately this is a ruthless business with little room for sentiment

But regardless, we won't lose the title in the direct matches vs Pep or Klopp. The title will be decided by the mistakes we make against the likes of Southampton and Wolves. If Ole has vastly greater resources and can't even get the better of Hassenhuttl etc, what's the excuse then?
Do name these managers
 
Why on earth would he say that? christ :lol:

he's playing down United's chances to keep the pressure off, there is nothing more to it

Because its the truth and he is paid millions by sky to be a pundit. If Liverpool were being managed by Gerrard and we had Klopp, he would have said it about them.
 
Because its the truth and he is paid millions by sky to be a pundit. If Liverpool were being managed by Gerrard and we had Klopp, he would have said it about them.

not even gonna bother responding to that

still think the midfield isn't the problem watching this? :lol:
 
not even gonna bother responding to that

still think the midfield isn't the problem watching this? :lol:

The reason we keep getting cut open in midfield is because the ball won't stick up front and we end up giving it away with everybody ahead of the ball. Ronaldo isn't going to lose it as softly as our forwards have been doing.

Our midfield is a weak point but we could have Xavi in his prime and still have the same problem. Its on Ole that he can't find a balance in the side.
 


this was before we got Ronaldo. Now after we have signed Ronaldo who is a better player than Kane, he came out yesterday and said the team is not ready to win titles. He is working so hard to protect his mate with the hypocrisy he say everyday.
 
He's getting a bit too giddy about things this year.

Watches Lukaku tap one in against a depleted Arsenal and declaring him to be some sort of world beater.
Then says Havertz can be "anything" despite failing to play the simplest of balls to Lukaku for a certain chance on goal v Liverpool.
 
He's getting a bit too giddy about things this year.

Watches Lukaku tap one in against a depleted Arsenal and declaring him to be some sort of world beater.
Then says Havertz can be "anything" despite failing to play the simplest of balls to Lukaku for a certain chance on goal v Liverpool.

That's his thing. Gets an idea and goes all in. Did the same with Southgate in the summer.

Did it all last season whenever somebody had a good 10 mins against us. Got all giddy about their "shape". Then we go two up and their shape is never mentioned again.

Once you remember its just football I find it quite entertaining.
 
He’s right tbf. We won’t win the title this season. This is going to be the hardest season for any team to win the league but I think it’s between Chelsea and Liverpool.

Totally. Even if we signed a really decent DM we would struggle because we don't have a great coach. But without the DM we're third at best. Ronaldo like Cavani will play in the box so no matter how good he is, he's not going to win games lost in midfield.