Is the book thread not there to cover all of the books? I've not read it in fear of being spoiled but I scanned through a couple of pages and there didn't seem to be much use of spoiler tags. It seems a bit hypocritical to tell someone to feck off in fear of them spoiling you, only to send them to somewhere that they might be spoiled themselves. If the book thread only keeps in pace with the TV series I'll forget about this thread and move into there, but I don't want to go there only for someone to be discussing something I've not got to yet. Likewise I don't want to have to tip-toe around subjects that other people haven't arrived at yet. If something is in spoiler tags and is accompanied by an appropriate warning, I really don't see what the big problem is.
As I've said multiple times, and I've seen others post it in the past as well, there isn't anywhere for people who haven't yet finished reading the books but are watching the TV series to discuss anything. Any mention of the word 'book' in here and everyone flips with people calling for bans (see below). I made an error before and have apologised. However, there's not much else I can do about that now other than repeat the apology.
As I said above, it seems a bit hypocritical to call anyone who dares to mention the book selfish because they might spoil you, even if they post in spoiler tags clearly marked as potential book spoilers, whilst telling them to go to a thread where they themselves might be spoiled.
If the book thread is just keeping pace with the TV series I'll go there and everything I've said in this thread can be considered redundant and be replaced with my apologies for wasting your time. Until then though, I really don't see why everyone's getting there knickers in such a twist about the idea that someone could potentially discuss how the TV series ties in with the book, providing that it's all appropriately spoilered, in the TV thread.