Frenkie de Jong | The last muppeting lap

Frenkie to United?


  • Total voters
    2,033
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
We need this transfer so much more than them, already got Kante, Kovacic & Jorginho
 
Another week wasted, are people at the club aware we have to start McFred again this weekend if they don't do something today?
Chances of anyone we sign this week featuring this weekend are slim to none. Featuring against Liverpool are slim.
 
Guarantee Erik has rolled out the red carpet about him being the centre piece of his Utd rebuild and outlined how much he wants him, also how he can be the one to get us back into the Champions League.

The problem is I have serious doubts that he will actually believe it and be prepared to buy into the project he's building

Well, he knows the man and has seen his work upfront. I am sure he has a lot of credit in the bank.
 
Christensen has removed all references to Barcelona from his social media and even posted a pic of him in a chelsea shirt again. What the actual feck.

Barca are just bat shit crazy! :eek:

Chelsea might not need to sign a centre back after all! That’s a pretty shit way to treat a player though.
 
Christensen has removed all references to Barcelona from his social media and even posted a pic of him in a chelsea shirt again. What the actual feck.

Barca are just bat shit crazy! :eek:

Chelsea might not need to sign a centre back after all! That’s a pretty shit way to treat a player though.
If only Chelsea signed Fofana already
 
So Chelsea have signed Chukwuemeka and are signing Casadei as well as Gallagher returning from loan at Palace and will all be added to Jorginho, Kante, Kovacivic and RLC whilst playing 3-4-3 therefore only having room for two out of those seven (I’m not including Mount as he likely plays further forward with Chelsea needing forwards) in their starting eleven yet are going to pay £80 million for De Jong ?

Right now Chelsea’s forward options from who they’re not trying to move on are Sterling, Mount and Havertz as they’re trying to move Ziyech, Batshuayi and CHO on and it’s unclear with Pulisic and Broja so they desperately need a wide player and a striker although they’ve already spent £175 million with another £80 million or more earmarked for Fofana which will take them to well over £250 million without a wide player or striker.

I’d love to know how this is all possible with FFP ? They’ve recouped £18 million for Werner and £10 million for Lukaku whilst paying most of his wages still yet they can spend potentially well over £400 million if they were to get Fofana, De Jong, a wide player and a striker ? Even PSG and City can’t do that so how are Chelsea potentially doing so ?

I commented on the FFP/accounting stuff on here a few days ago. Not bothered to add up the calculations again so here ya go:

Well sure it adds up to £400M if you keep pulling the numbers out of your arse. :lol:

But even so, it has to be stated that clubs generally don’t give a feck about the transfer fee spending during a single window but rather the long term total costs (amortisation+salary) of the deals.

Compared to last season Chelsea have already made very significant savings in these costs even without any notable sales so far. Getting all of Saul Niguez, Danny Drinkwater (yes he was still at the club), Antonio Rüdiger and Andreas Christensen off the books permanently means a saving of around £50M a year on the club’s books. Add to that Lukaku's salary being paid by Inter for the loan period and the £8M loan fee it's another £25M saved compared to last season. Werner is going back to Leipzig for just enough of a fee to cover his remaining amortisation value and his big salary will be gone so add another £20-25M a year in yearly savings on the books. Alonso will be another goner.

Funny how all these figures start adding up so that signing a few new players all of a sudden isn't going to be such a huge deal as it may seem at first glance. Remember that all these new signings will be amortised on the books for the contract duration as well so if anything, with all the savings mentioned above and the additions of Sterling, Koulibaly, Cucurella, Chukwuemeka, Slonina I'm pretty sure the club's total wages+amortisation costs have actually gone down from last year, although Lukaku is still an ongoing issue that may bite us again next year but for now he's more or less out of the calculations save from the difference in transfer fee amortisation - loan fee.

Even without big sales this year, the players that have been released and loaned out all add up for some big total savings on the books. And btw what you said about Chelsea still covering most of Lukaku's wages is not right. He took a big pay cut to re-join Inter because that's how desperate he was to go back to where he was 'loved'.

So far the club have spent £160M on transfers, counting only the initial fees and not including bonuses. Aside from Sterling and Koulibaly all the others (Cucurella, Chukwuemeka and Slonina) have signed six year contracts so the yearly amortisation cost for all these deals added together is only £31M which is not a lot more than the total yearly amortisation costs for the players who have already left. The outgoing players also released some serious space in the wage budget so wages for the new players is not a problem either.

Now if the club were to sign a few more high profile players (Fofana, Frenkie and maybe a forward) before the window shuts, the costs would go up by a lot more but then again there will be more players leaving as well. Even if the deals for outgoing players don't seem all that great at first sight, just getting their amortisation costs and salaries off the budget can have a huge impact like for example the Lukaku loan and Werner sale.

Having a big summer doesn't automatically mean bad things for FFP purposes, as long as there are equal cuts to previous costs (outgoing players) or increases in revenues. So far Chelsea have both made up space in the budget with departures as well as some slight increases in commercial income (new sleeve sponsor). It also looks like COVID is a thing of the past and things like match day revenue etc. can be expected to return to pre-COVID levels or higher.

And as far as FFP is concerned, I'm pretty sure there's still some amendments in place because of covid (remember it's looked at with a 3 year rolling period) so I don't think any club will have any problems with FFP as we've gotten to know it. The new FFP rules will be coming in a few years but there will be a phasing in period of a few years before they're fully in place so lots of time for Chelsea and other clubs to make necessary adjustments before then.
 
Christensen has removed all references to Barcelona from his social media and even posted a pic of him in a chelsea shirt again. What the actual feck.

Barca are just bat shit crazy! :eek:

Chelsea might not need to sign a centre back after all! That’s a pretty shit way to treat a player though.
Guess that's more funds available for FdJ then :(
 
Only the fact they have missed out on a few targets this summer albeit to Barca is my only slither of hope, well and the silence of Utd's main journos I spose.
 
This poem is called Today:

A day is a day
Is today the day
A big day today
Today today
Or 2 days
Today
Today
Big today
Or 2 days today
Big
 
Chelsea fans haven't yet earned the right to call him Frenkie just yet. There's another 10 weeks of penance to do before this will be allowed, especially if he signs for Chelsea
 
Guess that's more funds available for FdJ then :(
Yep, not necessarily good news for us in relation to signing FDJ.

What is interesting is Chelsea are reported to be bidding even less than us for the transfer fee. That would suggest that Barca don’t believe themselves that FDJ will accept a move to Utd. Because if they did, it wouldn’t make sense accepting a lower bid from another club. All very bizarre.
 
Yep, not necessarily good news for us in relation to signing FDJ.

What is interesting is Chelsea are reported to be bidding even less than us for the transfer fee. That would suggest that Barca don’t believe themselves that FDJ will accept a move to Utd. Because if they did, it wouldn’t make sense accepting a lower bid from another club. All very bizarre.
That's a good point, but could also be Chelsea expecting Barca growing more desperate since we're way later in the window
 


Indeed. FdJ to Chelsea looks quite likely and Chelsea are certainly telling anyone and everyone that they are confident about the deal, but it is not the first (or even the second) time this summer they have been confident about a deal that didn't come to fruition.

It would appear that the reports suggesting that Boehly has a big mouth and he likes to run it, are accurate.
 
Why is it bad for us and FDJ about Christensen?
 
Christensen has removed all references to Barcelona from his social media and even posted a pic of him in a chelsea shirt again. What the actual feck.

Barca are just bat shit crazy! :eek:

Chelsea might not need to sign a centre back after all! That’s a pretty shit way to treat a player though.

Do we know if he actually change his pic to one in a Barca shirt in the first place?
 
That's a good point, but could also be Chelsea expecting Barca growing more desperate since we're way later in the window
What makes me think it’s heading to Chelsea is the fact I’ve never seen a transfer before where another team comes in with a lower bid and appear to be the favourites to sign him. I feel there must be some acknowledgement in Barca that a deal to Utd isn’t happening so they need to accept a “similar” fee from a club where it’s more likely to happen.

Normally second clubs come in with a bid to gazump the first team, not bid lower than them.
 
We need this transfer so much more than them, already got Kante, Kovacic & Jorginho

They also have Conor Gallagher, who certainly looked like he could have a bright future last season. I'd take him at United! Chelsea have shown with the likes of Mason Mount and Reece James that if you're good enough, you can win a place in the first team, regardless have how wealthy the club is and how widely they can operate in the transfer market. I'm surprised they aren't looking to create the room for Gallagher to develop and show what he can do, and maybe Billy Gilmour too, although last season wasn't too great for him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.