Arnautovic on his way to our officesChoo fecking choo.
If he leaves Barca, he's coming here. I don't care who he's told the he prefers Chelsea. Probably some racists on a London tube.
Poor Frenkie will be holding T-Bag's pocket before long.
Orney is at it again.
Quoted for reference.It's been over for the past few months, mate. In fact, it has never been "on" as the player clearly does not want to join United.
Yet, all the deluded muppets keep on going in circles in this thread to the tune of rehashed media bullshit posted on Twitter every few days.
And every lever reduces income streams for years, decades.They pull one more lever and that 100m deficit gets resolved. Barca won't pull that until they know exactly how much transfer fee revenue they will make before the deadline. They want to see how much the players bring in before taking out that loan.
The full Andy Mitten article is here
https://www.thenationalnews.com/spo...de-jong-deal-but-dutchman-not-ready-to-leave/
Andy is very well informed, especially when it comes to Barcelona, and of course he is, IMO, one of the best United proper journalists (i.e. does not speculate, actually makes the effort to speak to people who actually know what is going on).
Ignore if you don't like his work, but please don't feel the need to tell me you don't like his work.
We should be signing 2 CM this window and have plans in place for another 1 next summer at the very least.I honestly don't know how some of you are still doing it. After yesterday, any appetite to see us gamble until the last day for him (when it is now painfully obvious 1 CM won't be enough anyway) should be dead and buried.
The potential for us to sign nobody is too risky.
Cheers. I'd love to be proven wrongQuoted for reference.
Orney is at it again.
So Chelsea are ready to spunk £85m on Fofana, £97m on de Jong and STILL buy a striker??That'll be like what a 90 million deal? And they are negotiating for that striker as well? Fecking obscene the money they will spunk this season. Feck ffp useless crap.
Oh it’s absolutely reckless, but the most recklessness has already happened. If it means they have to pull one more lever to register the massive investment they’ve made this summer, they will absolutely do it without any hesitation.And every lever reduces income streams for years, decades.
It's reckless and based on them either winning lots or thinking they're immortal and there will always be someone/something to bail them out.
Orney is at it again.
£400m+ where did you get that from?So Chelsea are ready to spunk £85m on Fofana, £97m on de Jong and STILL buy a striker??
Thats nearly £200m on two players right there, add in however much for a striker and however much they've already paid upto now for other players... £400m+ window? Hmmmm
Love it. We all knew they were fiddling books and I’m glad La Liga isn’t accepting their BS just because of how big the club is.Incredible. Spanish radio claim Barcelona jointly set-up a holdings company to which it paid €150m of its own money to buy its own assets (to inflate value of sale). La Liga rejected it as not "new" money. Barça must now pay €37.5m tax on this payment. (per Collin Millar).
They've already signed Cucurella, Sterling, Koulibaly and Chukwuemeka. Those are well over £150M combined.£400m+ where did you get that from?
Poor Frenkie will be holding T-Bag's pocket before long.
Cucurella = £58m£400m+ where did you get that from?
They can always sign Arnautovic for ~10m. Pretty pleaseCucurella = £58m
Sterling = £50m
Koulibaly = £34m
Chukwuemeka = £16m
Fofana = £85m??
de Jong = £97m??
Striker???
Before a striker (if they get Fofana and de Jong+wages) thats £340m right there.
How much on a striker?
They’ve been linked to walkers-peters/Dumphries plus some Italian midfielder too.,Cucurella = £58m
Sterling = £50m
Koulibaly = £34m
Chukwuemeka = £16m
Fofana = £85m??
de Jong = £97m??
Striker???
Before a striker (if they get Fofana and de Jong+wages) thats £340m right there.
How much on a striker?
£60m Sterling, £72m Cucerella, £40m Koulibaly. Add that to the £200m above and it’s close to £400m.£400m+ where did you get that from?
Exactly, they have a lot to spend, but it's not unlimited amounts.They’ve been linked to walkers-peters/Dumphries plus some Italian midfielder too.,
What of today's news confirmed that for you?Been saying for weeks the twat was stringing ETH along now we know for sure.
Cucurella = £58m
Sterling = £50m
Koulibaly = £34m
Chukwuemeka = £16m
Fofana = £85m??
de Jong = £97m??
Striker???
Before a striker (if they get Fofana and de Jong+wages) thats £340m right there.
How much on a striker?
Cucurella = £58m
Sterling = £50m
Koulibaly = £34m
Chukwuemeka = £16m
Fofana = £85m??
de Jong = £97m??
Striker???
Before a striker (if they get Fofana and de Jong+wages) thats £340m right there.
How much on a striker?
Personally I think there is a 95% probability he joins Utd.I'm still utterly convinced that Frenkie leaves Barca this week and i'm 95% () sure that it's to United.
Yeah a club spending £400m is definitely the time to have a pop at the GlazersWell maybe their owners are ambitious. Not every owner is penny pinching one.
So which is which? Because a better reporter is saying he's not made a decision and doesn't have a preference yet when Mitten is saying he'd prefer ChelseaThe full Andy Mitten article is here
https://www.thenationalnews.com/spo...de-jong-deal-but-dutchman-not-ready-to-leave/
Andy is very well informed, especially when it comes to Barcelona, and of course he is, IMO, one of the best United proper journalists (i.e. does not speculate, actually makes the effort to speak to people who actually know what is going on).
Ignore if you don't like his work, but please don't feel the need to tell me you don't like his work.
It's all well and good being ambitious, but when you have so many quality players and limited positions, you're going to struggle to keep them happy and it's going to go south very quicklyWell maybe their owners are ambitious. Not every owner is penny pinching one.