So your response to somebody countering your very poor observation regarding Fred's two-footedness, instead of something on topic, is 'yeah but... he's not better than... *proceeds to list about 10 of the world's very best midfielders*
Actually, I originally wrote a fairly long post about Fred. The one-footedness comment was a characteristic that I have noticed for almost a year now. If you go through my entire post, you'll see I was complimentary of Fred in many ways.
Just because the statistic exists doesn't mean it's necessarily a good indicator of Fred's ABILITY with his right foot. It shows he's willing to use it, that's all.
% of passes completed with weaker foot
Avg. distance of passes completed with weaker foot
Shots on target with weaker foot vs. off target
I believe some of these stats do exist, and I'm sure the team's stats dept is compiling these if they aren't publicly available. But there is also the eye test.
How many times have we seen Fred literally pass the ball out of bounds? Can you remember Scholes or Carrick doing that with regularity?
There is a reason that CBs have some of the highest pass completion percentages -- they play a lot of low risk passes when building from the back. Does that mean they are the game's best passers? No.
Fred is a good player. I'm happy he's a member of Utd. But we need to start seeing and evaluating these players with nuance and intelligence instead of polarized camps of good and bad.
On to your comment about listing "world class midfielders"... Is it outrageous to expect a world class player as a DM for Manchester United? In the history of football, are we considered a top club who should have top players? Furthermore, is every player I listed world-class, or merely just better than Fred? Kessie is world class? Ndidi? Witsel? Winaldum? Brozovic?
Thanks for trolling me. I have enjoyed our repartee. Looking forward to your pithy two sentence response.