MAME DIOUF 32
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,577
Pretty hit and miss but his fitness level is ridiculous. His run for the goal shouldn't be possible in extra time.
this is where it’s pointless to read a game through stats. Numerous time he underhit balls and passed the ball between 2 players. Stats will say they were completed passes. Your eyes will tell you his passing is awful.
what? The starts account for the horrible passes as you’d put it. 10% of them were shite. 10% and everyone is flipping out. The problem was our attack wouldn’t have scored if the match went on for another 2 hours.
They do count. The one he inexplicably hammered at Telles’ chest from ten yards counts as a successful pass. That’s why passing percentage stats are fairly useless.it doesn’t though. Unless I’m mistaken the stats count passes that go to players? The 6-10 passes I’ve stated were poor, went to players but were short, to the wrong player, on in between two players.
that’s why I’m saying watching a game through stats does not in any way tell the whole story.
They do count. The one he inexplicably hammered at Telles’ chest from ten yards counts as a successful pass. That’s why passing percentage stats are fairly useless.
6-10.
The thing is that he made 138 in total. Nobody is going to remember all of those. Even if you added 6-10 onto the missed passes, his accuracy would range from 86%-83% (but you would have to do this for other players to be able to compare).
I think he is a good passer for getting the ball around, and he is good in open space. I think his ground passing's good, but a few were possibly too forced today. I do think he is better deeper myself.
90% accuracy. 2 key passes. Should have had an assist at the end from the pass to Martial. 4 tackles. 3 dribbles completed. He wasn't bad at all; he was actually one of our best players on the pitch.
We were dominant in possession with 62%. We controlled the midfield. We limited West Ham to 3 shots and 1 in target, having 17 and 5 ourselves.
Issue was that there wasn't much room today, and our number 10 went awol.
Agree with this. Also, it’s uncanny how often he is in position to snatch the ball when the opposition clears it from their box.He was fine. Matic was camped out in defence and VDB might as well have stayed at home. We know Fred is not a DM or a playmaker, but he was having to do both those jobs in addition to his own. Why on earth was he the one sitting outside their box looking for openings? It's not his job.
He's not at his best lately as if he's carrying a knock but it's still solid 7/10 performance which is very important. On the other hand VdB was total shite, didn't help one bit and Matic is just a walking passenger. VdB was supposed to show he could be a Bruno stand-in and even though the bar is set high, he was pretty horrible, invisible or too simple. I don't think Andreas Pereira would do worse than him and he didn't get many chances to play as a no 10 as this fraud. BTW I don't rate Andreas at all now but jusst to point out that VdB is there to create and Matic as a Pogba replacement as often Ole uses him did nothing either.
I am not sure why people think Fred needs to score ton of goals, he's there to provide a solid base, cover for players, tackle and intercept, pass it quick and sometimes to create which on a occassion he did very well but he will never get his assist because his player will fail to score, unlucky. His shooting should get better at times but you know if you're using that as an argument that he shouldn't start than I don't see why Martial & Rashford shouldn't be on the bench too, their finishing of late is abysmal.
I know you will disagree with me I got it. I know you will be in this thread to slate him whenever possible and praise McTominay in other for little. But we controlled the midfield well didn't concede any chances and the more game was played the better he got, passing accuracy was also okay in the end, created a couple of chances, this is enough from the most defensive CM we played today. If you can't understand that and that players have different roles other than scoring goals, then I am afraid that sanity is something which you should strikethrough in your dictionary.even if you are a fan of Fred’s - no sane person is rating him 7/10 today.
Was probably the best player on the pitch. thought he was great today. Amount of times he got a foot to something just as it looked like West Ham might do something. Yes some slopppy passes but overall thought he was good.even if you are a fan of Fred’s - no sane person is rating him 7/10 today.
I almost said the same thing a few games ago but thought it was too early to make what would be such an unpopular opinion. If we go purely in their performances as the #10, Pereira was better last season than VDB has been so far this season. Pereira was obviously utter trash when he played in the deeper central midfield, but in the earlier part of the season when he was playing at #10 he was at a decent squad player level. Whereas VDB's looked more impressive to me when played a bit deeper.On the other hand VdB was total shite, didn't help one bit and Matic is just a walking passenger. VdB was supposed to show he could be a Bruno stand-in and even though the bar is set high, he was pretty horrible, invisible or too simple. I don't think Andreas Pereira would do worse than him and he didn't get many chances to play as a no 10 as this fraud.
They can play whoever they want at #10 and that includes Bruno and our front three (that doesn't include Cavani) are most often awful. Why would it be any different when Donny is playing there?90% accuracy. 2 key passes. Should have had an assist at the end from the pass to Martial. 4 tackles. 3 dribbles completed. He wasn't bad at all; he was actually one of our best players on the pitch.
We were dominant in possession with 62%. We controlled the midfield. We limited West Ham to 3 shots and 1 in target, having 17 and 5 ourselves.
Issue was that there wasn't much room today, and our number 10 went awol.