DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Was it? I sure as hell would take a 15 point improvement! Not sure I fancy our chances, nor yours to be honest.Same as you!
Was it? I sure as hell would take a 15 point improvement! Not sure I fancy our chances, nor yours to be honest.Same as you!
Absolutely normal to do every now and then, especially in mickey mouse cup. But I saw some shocking statistics someone posted here before from last season regarding the rotation in PL last season. I recommend you to Google to understand what I mean.It seems a perfectly normal thing to rotate a back 4 for the Carabao Cup? And the 3 GKs aren't getting rotated, Kepa had to be dropped after the Liverpool debacle and Mendy only signed 2 days before WBA so wasn't ready yet. Mendy is going to play week in week out.
Clear third, not far behind this City side who only had 81 points last year after all.
Your squad is absolutely massive and filled with quality
If you couldn't push Liverpool for the title, the target should be at least to finish ahead of City which can happen, I see no reason why not.
Youre very top heavy but being top heavy is all you need to beat most sides outside of the top 8. We were outplayed by Brighton yet scored 3 and had 2 closely disallowed. Its how we got 3rd off you after the break.I think that's reasonable.
Strange to see you say our squad is filled with quality. Most of our players are garbage if you listened to most of the posters on here!
Well, if City play to their standard and finish with 95+ then that's not really feasible. Obviously they have question marks as well but yes, if they play like they did last year I'd hope to be in with a shout for 2nd place.
I’m judging Lampard based on how many goals Chelsea conceded last season. Tonight’s game is neither here nor there. They looked better than Spurs, that’s for sure.
I just don’t think Lampard is good enough and I think he’s expected to mount a title challenge this season. Chelsea are a club with very little patience. It’s been that way since their oligarch took over.
Was it? I sure as hell would take a 15 point improvement! Not sure I fancy our chances, nor yours to be honest.
They cant chuck it in their own net every game.With that defence?
They cant chuck it in their own net every game.
Its very managable but its up to Frank to sort it. If he doesnt then he'll have failed.
Absolutely normal to do every now and then, especially in mickey mouse cup. But I saw some shocking statistics someone posted here before from last season regarding the rotation in PL last season. I recommend you to Google to understand what I mean.
The rotation was insane. He nearly had a changed back 4 every game I think it was same back 4 ten Times in 38 games or something. Maybe @duffer knows better.
So you, as a Chelsea fan don’t have any problem with that? Rotation can be good but it can also be really bad. Lamps seems to go the same way this season. The sacking way that is.
Really, really doubt City will get past 85 points this season.
Neither am I but thats the expectations he should have. I dont think he will last myself to be fairHe's shown no signs of being about to organise an defence so far. I wouldn't be too hopeful.
If we do, then yeah, there'll be more focus on Ole and less on Woodward.81 points, not a crazy number.
If you end up spending 150 million this window (VDB and Sancho), surely there will be expectations on Ole as well to have a significant improvement?
I don't think anyone disagrees that there should be a huge points improvement.
However challenging for the title or bust (which with Liverpool not slowing down will likely take a points total above what our best ever teams managed to even challenge) with 6/7 new players to gel isn't realistic, next season is the time to be asking that from us.
Sure but my point has been longstanding that “winning the transfer market” means little in the short term for this season. You’ve no doubt signed some good, exciting players but it’s near impossible to get a whole new team to gel. I don’t think Utd will win it either but I do think we will finish above you guys again.Well no. We both don't have a snowball in hells chance of winning the league, but we're the ones that are more realistic about that.
Some will have to leave this windowCan you afford the wages of your current squad?
There are like 25 first team players.
Yes and I should also say that I think Lamps (and Ole) overachived (with the squad and the circumstances) - last season. Both were seen as transition managers and did very well. Lamps 4th with a transfer ban plus bad defence and Ole 3rd with a paperthin squad plus without Pogba and Rashy for half of the season.Yes, I think we did over-rotate at times. I just think it's odd to point to that after a game in the league cup! It's too early to say if that'll be the trend for this year as well if you ask me.
I had no problem with the team selection; I didn't like that Lampard failed to make adjustments during the game. Giroud should have come off far sooner and we should have gone 4-3-3.
Didn't Ole get a similar pass before he got a transfer window? Their was massive fanfare of him at the start so much so a pundit tried to pressure your board on live TV to give him a full time deal.That's reasonable but looking for that type of reason amongst rivals is rare. If we had spent the same as you and brought in that amount of quality you guys would be saying the same about Ole being a failure for 'underachieving'. For what it's worth I like Lampard and think he is a good manager but he is a good few years away from being ready for the Chelsea job (assuming that Chelsea are still a club who want to win the big trophies). The most baffled I've been so far this season is watching his tactics against Liverpool a few games ago considering you guys had given them real problems in the games last season by attacking them and that was before the new signings. I couldn't believe he had decided to try a more defensive approach and hadn't picked up on how unlucky you were against them last year with a more attacking approach.
Anyway I think when we hopefully get ourselves together after no preseason that we will likely battle for 3rd and 4th again although we'll both be hoping for much improved point totals than last year.
The real issue I think United fans have is not with Lampard but with the fact that it has felt like everything Ole has done has been analyzed to hell but Lampard got a bit of a 'pass' overall last year. This despite the fact that United and Chelsea are meant to have the same ambitions as clubs. So we'll be more likely to be hard on Frank as a result.
81 points, not a crazy number.
If you end up spending 150 million this window (VDB and Sancho), surely there will be expectations on Ole as well to have a significant improvement?
Yes and I should also say that I think Lamps overachived (with the squad and the circumstances) last season (Ole too). Both were seen as transition managers and did very well. Lamps 4th with a transfer ban plus bad defence and Ole 3rd with a paperthin squad plus without Pogba and Rashy for half of the season. So i really hope both gets more time to build on their projects. I see Ole and Lamps as the underdogs that want to take the next step and challenge Klopp & Pep. We’ll see about that.
You can never tell with some of our fanbase, a high number gave up on Drogba within a season but on the flip side chanted Torres' name after he tripped over the ball.How much 'goodwill' is there around Lampard? Is there a real desire amongst the Chelsea fans to support him even in hard times? Or do you guys just kind of accept that the owner decides these things and you can't influence them?
How much 'goodwill' is there around Lampard? Is there a real desire amongst the Chelsea fans to support him even in hard times? Or do you guys just kind of accept that the owner decides these things and you can't influence them?
Didn't Ole get a similar pass before he got a transfer window? Their was massive fanfare of him at the start so much so a pundit tried to pressure your board on live TV to give him a full time deal.
I agree with a lot of what you're saying in other paragraph's, I actually think he's overcomplicated things since lockdown, it's quite depressing thinking of those Billy Gilmour inspired performances against the Scouse duo, really thought we were starting to see us break through to a new level (it's what kept me sane with no football indefinitely thinking I had something really good to look forward too).
Yeah we shall see this season. As you said - it’s too early to make any conclusions right now. Now you also got some proper defenders in Silva and Chillwell - Will definately improve things. I would go for Chillwell Silva Zouma Azpi/James. Haven’t seen enough Chelsea games but I think that Will be enough for 3rd atleast.I think you're right to flag it up as a trend to keep an eye on - hopefully we have a clearly-defined CB hierarchy. For me the partnership should be Silva / Zouma - no language issues between them and Mendy (plus Azpi and Kante as well).
This answers a lot of the questions I would've had about why there seemed to be little support for Di Matteo.There's a hell of a lot given his status as a player, and the stories that have come out regarding his ability to convince young players to join his project (Ziyech, Werner, and Havertz all said Lampard's influence was key to them joining). In addition, the work done to include him in the club's hierarchy goes under the radar but is vital - too often in the past at Chelsea relations between the board and manager have become antagonistic, and the open lines of communication he has with Cech and Marina are important.
I think generally there's an understanding that he's new to this and that he has to improve, but there's no questioning his work ethic, passion, or connection to the club. I'd be shocked if he's sacked this year barring some sort of catastrophe.
81 points, not a crazy number.
If you end up spending 150 million this window (VDB and Sancho), surely there will be expectations on Ole as well to have a significant improvement?
This answers a lot of the questions I would've had about why there seemed to be little support for Di Matteo.
There was a considerable amount of angst that we'd replaced him with Benitez specifically, but at the same time I think there was a tacit understanding that he wasn't up for the job and that the team had more or less managed themselves to the CL in 11/12. Once we became the first CL holder to exit in the group stage (in a month where we managed zero wins from 5 matches, scoring a total of 3 goals), the writing was on the wall.
Er, what? The squad depth issue improves enormously with those hypothetical signings.Sancho, VDB and Telles and 76 points should be the minimum expectation from Ole. Our squad depth issues still won't have been fixed.
He has proven to be not a very good manager in the years after the fact but I don't think there was any such understanding that he wasn't up to the job, certainly not amongst Chelsea fans and certainly not at the time. We weren't that far off the league leaders at the time, 4-5 points, and we were playing incredible football with Hazard, Mata and Oscar.
The angst did have a lot to do with Rafa being the replacement, but to this day, knowing what became of RDM's managerial career, many fans will insist he was treated badly and it was wrong to sack him.
Can never prove it but i think Roman wanted to make the switch in the summer of 2012 but luckily had the awareness not to ruin a feel good close season that the CL brought.He has proven to be not a very good manager in the years after the fact but I don't think there was any such understanding that he wasn't up to the job, certainly not amongst Chelsea fans and certainly not at the time. We weren't that far off the league leaders at the time, 4-5 points, and we were playing incredible football with Hazard, Mata and Oscar.
The angst did have a lot to do with Rafa being the replacement, but to this day, knowing what became of RDM's managerial career, many fans will insist he was treated badly and it was wrong to sack him.
Er, what? The squad depth issue improves enormously with those hypothetical signings.