Frank Lampard | Burnley?

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,695
Location
Wolverhampton
Politician aside, is there any job in the world that rewards failure like being a football manager?

I mean, we know what lampard does at chelsea. He fails hard enough to get sacked.
 

SteveCoppellFan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
894
Getting rid of Potter now seems like a ridiculous idea when you dont have anyone else lined up except Lampard.

By Lampard's body language in that press conference it looks like he's already under pressure.

Madness.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
:lol:

Total confusing situation. They're not doing great but it's not like they getting thrashed every other game. They're 1 point away from the usual 40+ point safe zone. So unless permanent manager appointment is ready, it's more reasonable to write this season off.

Do Boehly think he can pull a CL final off with Lampard? I know they'd done it twice (seconds away for another with Hiddink first interim tenure, too) under Abramovich. But Lampard is a damaged good for Chelsea as well as this season with Everton. Just can't organize a defense which is usually the way to weather the storm and get results short term in CL.
 

bludsucker

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Messages
787
Shouldn’t the thread title contain “sack watch” in it. This is Chelsea we are talking about here
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
29,106
Squires must be loving this :lol: Boehly and the other dude who said Chelsea wasn't managed that well before they arrived, they are a real dynamic duo aren't they? Dumb and Dumber on roids.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
He's getting sacked end of the season
Their fixture list is super tough.

Lampard is not known for his ability to build a solid defense. He can easily get sacked if they get battered by couple of the teams they face.
 

TheLord

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
1,739
This is just a caretaker's position.
Chelsea were never going to finish in the top four and are certainly not going to win the Champions League this term. Who better to pacify the fan base in the short-term?


If the owners want to be absolutely sure about the next manager before signing him, then this makes a lot of sense to me. If Lampard is among those being considered for a long-term position, then I will be convinced that Boehly et al have no clue about football.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
This is just a caretaker's position.
Chelsea were never going to finish in the top four and are certainly not going to win the Champions League this term. Who better to pacify the fan base in the short-term?


If the owners want to be absolutely sure about the next manager before signing him, then this makes a lot of sense to me. If Lampard is among those being considered for a long-term position, then I will be convinced that Boehly et al have no clue about football.
Didn't need to sack Potter if they decide to write the season off. Having to pay extra for Lampard appointment with little/zero upside.

As disappointing as Potter, reading from all the Chelsea related threads, it's not like Chelsea fan wanted him go before this season end at all cost if not for a permanent appointment.
 
Last edited:

sugar_kane

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
3,605
Whether you rate him or not (and most people don't) Solksjaer must be wondering how the feck he hasn't had an offer from a decent team yet when this clown somehow keeps getting PL gigs.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,581
Hard to tell on the basis he didn't make the call.
Does it matter? He is the owner so responsible for the structure, putting competent people in charge, etc. It’s Glazers‘ fault after all that they relied on Woodward for example.
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
29,106
Whether you rate him or not (and most people don't) Solksjaer must be wondering how the feck he hasn't had an offer from a decent team yet when this clown somehow keeps getting PL gigs.
Is he an English national legend who helped the team reach many quarterfinals on major forums ? Is he feck.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,876
All reports are saying he had nothing to do with this decision.

Is quite amusing seeing just how many people aren't paying attention :lol:
You do realise that Boehly is just synonymous with those feckups in charge of Chelsea? People just use the terms interchangeably, and Boehly’s an effective shorthand. It’s not people getting confused about the details, it’s about people not caring about that level of detail.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
How does a failed Aston Villa manager (and the replacement is clearly better) get a caretaker position and a bigger club? :wenger:
 

Orange Tree

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
2,150
At least he didn't get appointed just before facing us. Hopefully any good feel factor he might have, is gone by then.
 

UweBein

Creator of the Worst Analogy on the Internet.
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
3,729
Location
Köln
Supports
Chelsea
Super Frank Lampard is back at the bridge.
No matter what will be next, I will try to enjoy it.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
14,065
Location
Manchester
At least he didn't get appointed just before facing us. Hopefully any good feel factor he might have, is gone by then.
I’d rather we did play them straight after his appointment… would have battered them while they still get use to any tactics/changes lampard wants to make. When we face them they could get into some kind of form.
 

Ghirahim

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 5, 2023
Messages
253
He was hopeless in Europe the last time Bayern cruised to a 3:0 win at Stamford Bridge.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,476
Supports
Chelsea
Does it matter? He is the owner so responsible for the structure, putting competent people in charge, etc. It’s Glazers‘ fault after all that they relied on Woodward for example.
You do realise that Boehly is just synonymous with those feckups in charge of Chelsea? People just use the terms interchangeably, and Boehly’s an effective shorthand. It’s not people getting confused about the details, it’s about people not caring about that level of detail.
He's not our owner, Clearlake are.

It's been pretty well reported that since the January transfer window that Eghbali has been taking the lead. There was even an announcement that Boehly was stepping down from his role he had at the beginning.

At absolute most he's a second in command to the former at this moment in time.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,825
Location
Manchester
I assumed that when Potter was sacked it was because they'd had the greenlight from somebody like Enrique or Naglesman and were moving early because they were worried about another club snapping them up.

It's genuinely mind boggling that they sacked Potter to bring in Lampard!
Utterly bizarre.

Must be chaos behind the scenes at Chelsea
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,876
He's not our owner, Clearlake are.

It's been pretty well reported that since the January transfer window that Eghbali has been taking the lead. There was even an announcement that Boehly was stepping down from his role he had at the beginning.

At absolute most he's a second in command to the former at this moment in time.
Yes he’s just the figure that became the face of the ownership group. You’re attributing a level of specificity to the comments that doesn’t actually exist. They’re not getting mixed up, they don’t care.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,581
He's not our owner, Clearlake are.

It's been pretty well reported that since the January transfer window that Eghbali has been taking the lead. There was even an announcement that Boehly was stepping down from his role he had at the beginning.

At absolute most he's a second in command to the former at this moment in time.
Again who cares? Swap it to whoever the owner is/are. Whoever decided to get rid off Tuchel, then hire Potter, then get rid and now hire Lampard. Even if the owner is fine with the tea lady making the decision it doesn’t change anything. The decisions being made are ridiculous and equally damaging regardless of what the person‘s name or position is.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
I can’t help but feel like if you gave Potter 3/4 seasons he would build Chelsea into an excellent team. Instead they sack him after 2 minutes and reappoint Lampard. Mental. If we sack ETH and bring back Ole I’ll stop supporting us. Even if we are in the bottom three