Fowler to Leeds?

I've heard Owen's fit...

When he's been injured in the past we've been fine..without Fowler....

We'll see what happens...
 
Yeah but face it Davey he's injured as often if not more than Giggs is and you no longer have adequate cover IMO in one of the most important positions on the pitch and despite Owen being a one trick pony he does that one trick rather well. Hence Fowler being sold by a rash Thommo is a bad move.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Yeah but face it Davey he's injured as often if not more than Giggs is and you no longer have adequate cover IMO in one of the most important positions on the pitch and despite Owen being a one trick pony he does that one trick rather well. Hence Fowler being sold by a rash Thommo is a bad move.</strong><hr></blockquote>


So if you sold Fortune would you be of a similar opinion?

Fowler is no replacement for Owen as he's no where near as good, I take your point that he too is a goalscoring/penalty box striker but he hasn'e been doing to for us with or without Owen..

Owen's been injured this season as well...

We've scored goals without Fowler
 
Furthermore when you play the defensive style of football that your lot do you really need finishers in your team to take advantages of the few chances you'll get in game. Heskey has proved he may hold the ball up well and win headers but he's no finisher. Litmanen is finished let's face it - the guy must be seething and regretting moving to Liverpool to sit on the bench like he did at Barca. Baros is totally unproven. So when Owen's out you have a problem which you won't be able to rely on your midfielders to solve for you.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Fowler being sold by a rash Thommo is a bad move.</strong><hr></blockquote>

:rolleyes:

This transfer has been on the cards for months, years even! Was it Thommo's fault when we accepted an offer from Chelsea last December?

You really don't know what you are talking about.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Furthermore when you play the defensive style of football that your lot do you really need finishers in your team to take advantages of the few chances you'll get in game. Heskey has proved he may hold the ball up well and win headers but he's no finisher. Litmanen is finished let's face it - the guy must be seething and regretting moving to Liverpool to sit on the bench like he did at Barca. Baros is totally unproven. So when Owen's out you have a problem which you won't be able to rely on your midfielders to solve for you.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Nonsense..

When we play defensively we attack at pace on the break..

This was Robbie's greatest undoing..


You'll say something that makes sense in a bit... ;)
 
It's not nonsense mate - everything I have said makes sense. You lot will be far poorer as a squad without Robbie Fowler. Once Owen's injured and you rely on Heskey and Litmanen you'll see.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>It's not nonsense mate - everything I have said makes sense.</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

On the contrary, nothing you have said has made sense.....

;)
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>It's not nonsense mate - everything I have said makes sense. You lot will be far poorer as a squad without Robbie Fowler. Once Owen's injured and you rely on Heskey and Litmanen you'll see.</strong><hr></blockquote>

It makes no sense..its nearly as bad as your claim that its Thommo who sold him, bit GH..

This season I've wanted Jari to play above Fowler, now thats more likely to happen unless we sign someone else - which I hope we don't!!!

Have you actually seen Robbie play lately?
 
Originally posted by Knoxy:
<strong>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

On the contrary, nothing you have said has made sense.....

;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

Why can't you admit that Fowler is a loss - you're like sheep you lot just blindly following that tit Thomson.

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>It's not nonsense mate - everything I have said makes sense. You lot will be far poorer as a squad without Robbie Fowler. Once Owen's injured and you rely on Heskey and Litmanen you'll see.</strong><hr></blockquote>

What happens if Ruud Van kneestillsore gets injured magic muffin????

Won't you lot be fecked then???
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

Why can't you admit that Fowler is a loss - you're like sheep you lot just blindly following that tit Thomson.

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

I've gotten over the loss of Fowler a long time ago, any REAL fans who know shit about Liverpool knew this day wasn't far around the corner...your pathetic attempts to make a mountain out of a mole hill are delusional...
 
Originally posted by se7en:
<strong>

kneestillsore

</strong><hr></blockquote>

do u still think that is humurous?

is that the scouse humour we hear about

get a life will you

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

Why can't you admit that Fowler is a loss - you're like sheep you lot just blindly following that tit Thomson.

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Dans

Can you explain to me again how we're going to miss Fowler due to our defensive tactics?

That was my particular favourite.... ;)
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

Why can't you admit that Fowler is a loss - you're like sheep you lot just blindly following that tit Thomson.

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

It's a loss, but it's certainly not to the extent that you're suggesting, in 18 months time he'd have left for nothing, in 12 months time he could have signed a pre contract with someone else (ala Mcmanaman) and we'd have got nothing. He didn't want to stay, he wouldn't have signed a new contract. We will now no longer have the constant speculation and/or rows erupting over and around Fowler on the eve of every important match. Fowler is most definately NOT the player he was!

The pro's of this sale vastly outeigh the cons.

When/if we get in a replacement, I have faith in GH's judgement that the replacement will be more than adequate. Baros for example.
GH has got us to where we are today, I have no reason to suspect selling Fowler isn't a good move in the long run.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Dans

Can you explain to me again how we're going to miss Fowler due to our defensive tactics?

That was my particular favourite.... ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

Scroll up mate - it's still there. Honest - I wouldn't delete it....
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

You'll find that at the end of the season you are the clueless tit softlad. You should instigate a Thommo out campaign before he ruins your club.</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>

do u still think that is humurous?

is that the scouse humour we hear about

get a life will you

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

I thought it was funny...it's not my fault you are rectally obstructed, let your hair down and lighten up...ya sad wanker

;)
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>


roflmao.gif


You are the biggest TiT on the planet SoftHead!! Here's a pic of that shite striker we have got called Viduka. It happens to be after he banged his FOURTH against you lot!

leeliv4.jpg


Your theories of us being broke are laughable too...not long ago you were saying we did not have any money to spend and yet again you are proved wrong. What does it matter where the money comes from as long as we get quality.
You got any money to spend at Anfailed...How about Arthur Fowler to replace Robbie? :D </strong><hr></blockquote>


<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> Give over Shaun, I know the financial state of your club very well and I also know that you've just taken out a £60million loan - that's how you can afford Fowler... you were broke and you will now have to sell to be able to spend any substantial amounts...

Good to see your squad size has passed 15 now... maybe you'll become a threat to our top spot?
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

Rarely played this season cos of a spat with Thommo. Had Thommo been ousted Fowler would have been back in the team in place of Heskey and would have found his form with a bit of support from the manager. Owen's about due another injury now. That leaves you with Heskey and who else? Litmanen who's rarely in the team, Baros who I've never even heard of (is he another Colombian doomed to failure?) and well that's about it isn't it?</strong><hr></blockquote>


<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> You really are showing yourself up now....
 
Originally posted by se7en:
<strong>

I thought it was funny...it's not my fault you are rectally obstructed, let your hair down and lighten up...ya sad wanker

;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

it was slightly funny a few months ago, but when its been used about 10000 times it kind of wears off

know what i mean 'arry

;)
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>

it was slightly funny a few months ago, but when its been used about 10000 times it kind of wears off

know what i mean 'arry

;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

You constantly go on about Michael Owen and his hamstrings...there is every chance Ruud will suffer again from his cruciate...I just want to remind you all to expect it at some stage.
 
Originally posted by se7en:
<strong>

You constantly go on about Michael Owen and his hamstrings...there is every chance Ruud will suffer again from his cruciate...I just want to remind you all to expect it at some stage.</strong><hr></blockquote>

i dont think you will find i have ever mentioned owen's hamstring anywhere mate.
 
Originally posted by Fergiesarmy:
<strong>

i dont think you will find i have ever mentioned owen's hamstring anywhere mate.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He's right you know 7 - get your facts straight you muppet. It was Murt and myself who keep going on about Owen's hamstring (which incidentally is about due a pull isn't it).
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

Scroll up mate - it's still there. Honest - I wouldn't delete it....</strong><hr></blockquote>

It doesn't make any sense Dans..

Do you think Fowler was more effective during our old style of keep ball with Macca, Redknapp etc or when we currently attack on the break as you mentioned?
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:
<strong>


<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> You really are showing yourself up now....</strong><hr></blockquote>

You think so?? I think you lot are by even bothering to respond. Bunch of clueless Muppets!

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

He's right you know 7 - get your facts straight you muppet. It was Murt and myself who keep going on about Owen's hamstring (which incidentally is about due a pull isn't it).</strong><hr></blockquote>

when i said "you" I was referring to you collectively...ok?

Not to worry we still have Heskey, Litmanen and Smicer who can play up front. Baros will be here soon enough...we still have better options than you lot up front. I'm sure we'll sign someone soon aswell...My guess is Kanoute
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> Give over Shaun, I know the financial state of your club very well OF COURSE YOU DO and I also know that you've just taken out a £60million loan - that's how you can afford Fowler... you were broke and you will now have to sell to be able to spend any substantial amounts... THATS WHAT YOU SAID BEFORE WE BOUGHT RIO, KEANE, JOHSON, FOWLER.... <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Good to see your squad size has passed 15 now... maybe you'll become a threat to our top spot?<hr></blockquote>

mmmm a whole 2 points in front of us....I would have thought it would be at least 15 with you having such a big and world class squad
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

mmmm a whole 2 points in front of us....I would have thought it would be at least 15 with you having such a big and world class squad </strong><hr></blockquote>

Yeah but we've had a few injuries to deal with....
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:
<strong>

Yeah but we've had a few injuries to deal with....</strong><hr></blockquote>


Not that old one...you will be telling us you are young next!
Perhaps that squad of yours is not big enough...have you got any money to buy players?
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>


Not that old one...you will be telling us you are young next!
Perhaps that squad of yours is not big enough...have you got any money to buy players?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Yeah..

Some clowns have just given us 11m

;)
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>


Not that old one...you will be telling us you are young next!
Perhaps that squad of yours is not big enough...have you got any money to buy players?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Excuses sound very familar don't they? <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

We have about £25m before we take into account any revenues from the CL... :)
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Doesn't make sense. Why would you sell your 2nd best striker. He's much better than Litmanen and Heskey imo. And Baros is still unproven. A bad move for LFC.</strong><hr></blockquote>

LOL, Litmanen delivers always.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>An era is over at Anfield ehh Red Tide. Why Fowler though. Why not offload Litmanen. He hasn't done jack since coming over last year.</strong><hr></blockquote>

what? how much has he played? every time he's been in the starting lineup he's been of MoM quality. F*cking bullocks :mad:
 
Litmanen = overrated. If he always delivers then why doesn't he always play. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Fowler is better than Litmanen. Advantage sheep.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Litmanen = overrated. If he always delivers then why doesn't he always play. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
</strong><hr></blockquote>

Because he doesn't fit their gritty style...

Class act IMO, even now...
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Litmanen = overrated. If he always delivers then why doesn't he always play. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Fowler is better than Litmanen. Advantage sheep.</strong><hr></blockquote>

ask Houllier wiseguy, btw Litmanen is far more versatile than Fowler and if I'm not mistaken Litmanen has a better strike rate (with the few chances he's had) than Fowler who's been higher in the pecking order.
 
If he doesn't fit into their gritty style then why did they get him. It seems not to make much sense to buy a player, hype him up and not use him.
 
Originally posted by Divine:
<strong>

Because he doesn't fit their gritty style...

Class act IMO, even now...</strong><hr></blockquote>

I agree, I think Jari might have made a mistake joining the scousers, they are far cry from the technical style Jari used to play with Ajax.

I hope he gets his chance of regular time with the 1st side, he's a magician when given the chance.