FINAL - Skizzo VS Cal - All time 3 yr peak - Auction Draft

[Pat_Mustard]

Not him. He voted way back

Hmm, I'm intrigued by this too, so by process of elimination

• Gio
• Cal?
• Stobzilla
• kafta
• DanNistelrooy
• Sky1981
• Solius
• kps88
• Uniquim
• Mani
• Ish84045
• Unlikely lad
• Theon
• Skills
• Isotope
• soap
• The Man Himself
• RooneyLegend
• rpitroda
• ctp
• Piratesoup
• Marty1968
• Theafonis
• Mciahel Goodman

Pretty sure I seen all their names earlier, and probably Piratesoup and Skills too. Can you remember any of the others?

 

[green_smiley]

Think kps88, Skills and ctp have voted earlier

So DanNistelrooy, Unlikely lad, RooneyLegend and Piratesoup are highly suspected to be wolves

It is good time for priest or seer to come out now

 

[Skizzo]

Think kps88, Skills and ctp have voted earlier

So DanNistelrooy, Unlikely lad, RooneyLegend and Piratesoup are highly suspected to be wolves

It is good time for priest or seer to come out now

Exactly what a wolf would say...

 

[Mciahel Goodman]

@Pat_Mustard I voted with a good few hours to go -- it was 22-20 (or something like that) in favour of Skizzo. It's fairly obvious that you shouldn't rush vote in one of these things -- would be better not to vote if you don't at least read the OPs -- but unless there's some sort of rule clearly stating not to vote (have no idea how you'd even phrase it) then you're going to run into trouble. Also, a last minute voter, whoever it was, isn't necessarily a voter who put less thought into it -- he/she might have put more thought in and as a consequence just taken longer to actually vote, reading comments, arguments/counter arguments etc. I don't think you should demonize whoever it was.

 

[antohan]

Think kps88, Skills and ctp have voted earlier

So DanNistelrooy, Unlikely lad, RooneyLegend and Piratesoup are highly suspected to be wolves

It is good time for priest or seer to come out now

Dan and Rooney are safe as houses. Piratesoup... erratic, but he hasn't played before, has he? Has to be Unlikely lad, already setting up excuses with his username.

Anyone up for analysing their votes in the previous games? The culprit will stick out like a sore thumb.

 

[Cal?]

Dan and Rooney are safe as houses. Piratesoup... erratic, but he hasn't played before, has he? Has to be Unlikely lad, already setting up excuses with his username.

Anyone up for analysing their votes in the previous games? The culprit will stick out like a sore thumb.

You make it sound like whoever did it did something wrong.

 

[antohan]

@Pat_Mustard I voted with a good few hours to go -- it was 22-20 (or something like that) in favour of Skizzo. It's fairly obvious that you shouldn't rush vote in one of these things -- would be better not to vote if you don't at least read the OPs -- but unless there's some sort of rule clearly stating not to vote (have no idea how you'd even phrase it) then you're going to run into trouble. Also, a last minute voter, whoever it was, isn't necessarily a voter who put less thought into it -- he/she might have put more thought in and as a consequence just taken longer to actually vote, reading comments, arguments/counter arguments etc. I don't think you should demonize whoever it was.

Such wolf, clearly protecting his teammate.

 

[antohan]

You make it sound like whoever did it did something wrong.

Another one. Oh! Of course! They were protecting the alpha!

Guys, it may be Unlikely lad or Piratesoup, but I say we lynch Mcihael Goodman and Cal? first, then check how the other two behave during those lynches (or the seer checks either). No need for the priest to come out yet.

LYNCH CAL?

Not a question, BTW.

LYNCH CAL? !!!!!!!!!!!!

That's actually a brilliant username for WW, you would never know if people are making affirmative statements or floating a theory

 

[Cal?]

Another one. Oh! Of course! They were protecting the alpha!

Guys, it may be Unlikely lad or Piratesoup, but I say we lynch Mcihael Goodman and Cal? first, then check how the other two behave during those lynches (or the seer checks either). No need for the priest to come out yet.

LYNCH CAL?

Not a question, BTW.

LYNCH CAL? !!!!!!!!!!!!

That's actually a brilliant username for WW, you would never know if people are making affirmative statements or floating a theory

I didn't have that "?" when I first joined, it's a long story...

 

[antohan]

I didn't have that "?" when I first joined, it's a long story...

You should post it in the username explanation thread.

 

[crappycraperson]

I didn't have that "?" when I first joined, it's a long story...

Was it added after the Sweden-Denmark match fixing gate ?

 

[Mciahel Goodman]

Such wolf, clearly protecting his teammate.

More like traitor making rational argument but with hint for the wolves to spot.

 

[antohan]

More like traitor making rational argument but with hint for the wolves to spot.

Either way, we are lynching you.

 

[green_smiley]

Oops, I have derailed the thread

 

[Cal?]

Was it added after the Sweden-Denmark match fixing gate ?

Oops I meant this one yes

 

[Pat_Mustard]

@Pat_Mustard I voted with a good few hours to go -- it was 22-20 (or something like that) in favour of Skizzo. It's fairly obvious that you shouldn't rush vote in one of these things -- would be better not to vote if you don't at least read the OPs -- but unless there's some sort of rule clearly stating not to vote (have no idea how you'd even phrase it) then you're going to run into trouble. Also, a last minute voter, whoever it was, isn't necessarily a voter who put less thought into it -- he/she might have put more thought in and as a consequence just taken longer to actually vote, reading comments, arguments/counter arguments etc. I don't think you should demonize whoever it was.

Not in the slightest mate. Its just pure curiosity on both Cal and I's part. I often leave voting very late in tight games myself as I want to follow the full thread before making a decision.