Kristjan
Retired Dictator
I swear if I read the words "Nynaeve tugged at her braid" or any variation of that one more time I'm going to go fecking mental.
you forgot the endless arranging of skirts
I swear if I read the words "Nynaeve tugged at her braid" or any variation of that one more time I'm going to go fecking mental.
They should all have their hands removed. It's worse than "little and less" and "much and more" in ASOIAF.you forgot the endless arranging of skirts
I swear if I read the words "Nynaeve tugged at her braid" or any variation of that one more time I'm going to go fecking mental.
This should help: https://library.tarvalon.net/index.php?title=Book_Summaries
After a 15 month break I now intent to continue and just went to the bookstore and bought book 11, Knife of dreams. it'll be quite hard to get into it again, I've already forgotten so much.
Cosca is hilarious. One of the funniest characters ever made.Nicomo Cosca in Red Country rivals Bayaz and Glotka as the best character Abercrombie has written. I've seen writers go overboard trying to portray how evil a character is, but the casual lack of morals Cosca displays is just chilling.
That book is alright, but nothing special. The following one (The Gathering Storm) is second only to Fires of Heaven IMO.This should help: https://library.tarvalon.net/index.php?title=Book_Summaries
Be careful of spoilers regarding other books and characters.
Its widely acknowledged that the pace generally picks up from this book onward so you should be able to breeze through the remainder of the series.
Yeah not saying its the best book, just that things start moving towards Tarman Gaidon in this book.That book is alright, but nothing special. The following one (The Gathering Storm) is second only to Fires of Heaven IMO.
Yeah you should like First Law.Would you all recommend The First Law? I loved ASOIAF, Mistborn, Kingkiller, Stormlight Archive etc and this seems like the next choice in fantasy without dropping into the really heavy stuff like WoT and Malazan, both of which I'm not amazingly keen on starting.
Would you all recommend The First Law? I loved ASOIAF, Mistborn, Kingkiller, Stormlight Archive etc and this seems like the next choice in fantasy without dropping into the really heavy stuff like WoT and Malazan, both of which I'm not amazingly keen on starting.
Just finished Black Company, thoroughly enjoyed it, had to laugh at the magic carpets though. Is the rest of the series worth reading?
Yes, Books of the North are the best ones, but Books of the South and the final two books of the Glitterling Stone are very good too.Just finished Black Company, thoroughly enjoyed it, had to laugh at the magic carpets though. Is the rest of the series worth reading?
Everyone should read the First Law. It is the closest thing I have read to ASOIAF, so very different to Mistborn/Stormlight and Kingkiller.Would you all recommend The First Law? I loved ASOIAF, Mistborn, Kingkiller, Stormlight Archive etc and this seems like the next choice in fantasy without dropping into the really heavy stuff like WoT and Malazan, both of which I'm not amazingly keen on starting.
Just finished Black Company, thoroughly enjoyed it, had to laugh at the magic carpets though. Is the rest of the series worth reading?
Yes, Books of the North are the best ones, but Books of the South and the final two books of the Glitterling Stone are very good too.
Duplicate account. @Revan and @MichaelKorleone banned.Books of the North are the best and at the end of book 3 you can choose whether to invest your time further or move on. There's a sense of closure at the end of Books of the North but a lot happens after that too. Books of the South are good as well, the first two of Books of Glittering Stone are a bit meh but your experience may vary if you consider Murgen's point of view jumps across times and places. Water Sleeps and Soldiers Live are absolutely amazing though!
PS
There's a spin-off with Case's point of view which is possibly considered book 3.5 but you can skip it completely as it does not affect the overall arc.
Duplicate account. @Revan and @MichaelKorleone banned.
Murgen was the worst POV IMO. Croaker obviously the best, followed by Lady and Sleepy.Heh, I stayed away from this thread for several months as I was stuck at Dreams of Steel for a long while. Lady's pov didn't work for me initially as much as Croaker's did. But once Murgen came at Bleak Seasons my entire life turned bleak* too. Resumed the series after a while but those two final books really made it all worthwhile.
Murgen's pov is not that bad if you know that he sees events from future. I was first afraid he's an unreliable narrator and is fooling the readers with a lot of lies but he's not a bad egg after all. His pov also suffers from the fact that Siege of Dejagore isn't that interesting initially compared with the all-action adventures of previous books.
* - Thanks, Vangle; at least I was able to finish a huge number of Wodehouse books in last 3 years.
Murgen was the worst POV IMO. Croaker obviously the best, followed by Lady and Sleepy.
Yeah, it was Gorst that really made the book for me (even though Calder was my "favourite" character). The way Abercrombie revealed the cognitive dissonance in how the character sees the world was emblematic for the brilliance in the way Abercrombie subtly juxtaposes the character's inner life with "what really happened". The fact that we, as a reader, also often don't get "factual" recollections of what happened, or what a person is actually like, makes it all the more interesting.I really want to get Sharp Ends, but I'm still balls deep in Wheel of Time.
I'm torn between between Best Served Cold and The Heroes as my favourite. I enjoyed BSC the whole way through and Castor is one of my favourite characters ever. The Heroes I was actually a bit bored with at times, but by the end loved it. Gorst really stood out in that one for me, he was brilliant. A lot of his characters have a hint of hopeless depression about them.
Finished The Prince of Nothing trilogy, and while I liked it, I didn't find it nowhere as good as asoiaf forum suggests. I also found the books getting worse.
I loved the setting. Despite that it is basically a copy of real world (The main Empire being Byzantine Empire, Maithanet being the Pope, Tusks being Christians with their Prophet apparently having had a similar life to Jesus, the others being Arabs and so on) with added magic, it felt a very good setting.
The main problems IMO were the philosophical ramblings (like in Dune books, they get worse with each book) and Kellhus. The problem of Kellhus is that the author tells but doesn't show. You hear everyone masturbating in his/her love for Kellhus, but you barely ever see a strong argument from Kellhus. What you see is some pointless metaphysical rambling that would (probably not) make the God Emperor of Dune proud. In addition I didn't find the Dynaun mysterious, just that the author didn't give any info on that.
On the other side, I think that I liked the 'transformation' (if it is the right word) of Kellhy Sue. Despite that it was obvious from the very beginning that he's more some type of Antichrist/Dajjal rather than Jesus/Prophet, it is interesting how at the beginning he looked nice and was making people love him, but by the end he was massacring tens of thousands and was becoming more evil and evil (in reality, he was the same from the beginning, but just his behavior changing).
I didn't have problems with the rape happening there (more than in any other books?), neither with women being second class citizens. The society is very similar to Europe a millennia ago, and those things were present there too.
I am going to read the following books.
The problem is that I consider a well written character if you see what he is doing, not only hear about what he is doing (show, not tell). Look at Varys in ASOIAF and Bayaz in The First Law, you see them manipulating the events; you see why Locke in Gentleman Bastards is such a great thief; you see how Mat in WoT is a great general; Kvothe a prodigy alchemist in Kingskiller; Vaelin a great warrior in Raven's Shadow; Vin, Kelsier and Kaladin being great warriors/mages in Cosmere and so on.Pretty much everything you said is pretty spot on.
I think the philosophical side divides people. I enjoy it.
As for Kellhus... I think the character is probably one of the best "super intelligence" I've read, but as any character where an author is forced to write beyond themselves you don't see what the characters see. Kellhus has a big cheat tool in the form of face reading which basically gives him carte blanche in regards to how insightful he can be. The way he dominates others through manipulation and insight is really well done though I think. The face reading bit in the council where they are deciding who will lead the war (Conphas of Cnauir) is one of my favourites.
Keep going with the Aspect Emperor. I enjoyed them just as much. Kellhus becomes very enigmatic as we lose his POV for a long while. The series turns its focus to the other main characters (and some new ones). I think the series has done a good job of keeping the quality high whilst building towards an epic conclusion.
Robots then Empire (it is shit) and then Foundation. Robots were the best IMO.Planning on reading Isaac Asimov's Foundation and Robot series. Anyone read it? Any suggestions as to which order I should read them. As I understand, the publication order is not the chronological order.
Thanks. It was basically this or Discworld. Still may go with Discworld but the reading order for that is confusing as hellRobots then Empire (it is shit) and then Foundation. Robots were the best IMO.
The exact chronology is:
1) I, Robots - a collection of stories
2-5) Elijal Bailly and R. Danieel novels
6-8) The Empire trilogy
9-10) Foundation prequels
11-13) Foundation trilogy
14-16) Foundation sequels (haven't read them).
I would recommend to read all 5 Robots books, then to go directly to Foundation prequels (which I enjoyed more than the main trilogy) and then Foundation trilogy.
Be warned though, the books are terribly aged, and I don't think that they are anywhere as good as people say. They are also a bit juvenile.
I remember seeing that graph before I read the books, and I think it absolutely makes no sense.Thanks. It was basically this or Discworld. Still may go with Discworld but the reading order for that is confusing as hell
I also found this on scifi stackexchange:
I am not sure about reading the prequels before the main books as I am worried about stuff getting spoiled since the prequels were written in the late 80s.