DavelinaJolie
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
- Messages
- 4,108
A saga for the ages. Good luck to the lad for the future.
I think with current PSR rules and the length of time with us , it should be a positive on the balance sheet at least.€8m is not great. But 45% sale isn’t bad. Hopefully he does well and goes to another club for €20-25m later and we will make enough from his sale.
Considering the record transfer from the Greek league is less than €20m i'd say thats highly unlikely. Being realistic hopefully he start giving some good performances and they can sell him for about 10M.€8m is not great. But 45% sale isn’t bad. Hopefully he does well and goes to another club for €20-25m later and we will make enough from his sale.
He has 2 years left because we have the option to extend for a further year. Same with McT. Pellistri has 26 caps for Uruguay whereas this random kid at the age of 21 has 26 appearances for Swansea.
A lot of these sell ons are contingent on the sales price being above what the club originally paid. So it may be we only get 45% of anything beyond the 6M they can sell him for.Considering the record transfer from the Greek league is less than €20m i'd say thats highly unlikely. Being realistic hopefully he start giving some good performances and they can sell him for about 10M.
So you’re saying hypothetically if they are getting €15m for him they would let him go for free rather than getting the €7-8m to balance the books? These clubs are super rich and anyone in they would happily take.One problem with high sell-ons is they disincentivize the new club from selling the player at all. If the Greek club has to pay half the transfer fee to us, they may just keep him and let him go on a free when his contract expires.
What I said was on the margins it decreases their incentive to sell. That's just a fact. There's some value to having the player in the club, so the sales price they receive must exceed the value they'd get from retaining them. The higher the sell-on clause % is, the more likely it is the new club will struggle to sell the player while still making the finances work.So you’re saying hypothetically if they are getting €15m for him they would let him go for free rather than getting the €7-8m to balance the books? These clubs are super rich and anyone in they would happily take.
At least get your facts straight, he isnt 23 and he cost us more than £7m,.I'm not sure what you really want people to say in response. We literally signed Pellistri for peanuts, and now he's being sold for peanuts. You want us to sign £7m players, great, he's an example of that and it didn't work out, but the squad needs serious investment now to become competitive for CL spots in the short to medium term. There's still time in the future to try more cheaper deals on younger talents to speculate.
Pellistri has gone out on average loans to lower level La Liga sides who aren't interested in signing him permanently, and it seems like the only interest came from a side in the Greek league. A team in a better league that literally saw him day in day out for an entire season wasn't interested in signing him permanently.
Now every other club in the world may be wrong, he may be some flower yet to blossom, but the more likely answer is he's just not that good a player and at 23 his ceiling is limited. Him playing for Uruguay doesn't change that.
AHH yes. 9 mill and 23 in four months.At least get your facts straight, he isnt 23 and he cost us more than £7m,.
AHH yes. 9 mill and 23 in four months.
Colossal differences. I completely retract everything I said because that completely changes everything.
Get a grip
Can’t believe we got only £5m for him when City were able to sell Palmer for 8x that.