Final ball/productivity aside, he's just as direct as Garnacho. He's not going to get it but if he has an equal run in the team, he could be very useful.
Whose minutes should he be taking? Gernacho? Antony? Rashford? Sancho? What about when Amad returns? Then there's Hojlund to add to the attack.As I've been saying, I don't understand why he hasn't gotten the minutes here. Always shows me something positive whenever I watch him play.
Not just that, but he's a right wing option who has shown that he can compete with our first choice options there. I don't dislike Antony like more than half this fanbase seems to, but you see the directness that Pellistri brings over Antony.I don't understand the notion of loaning him. We don't have enough wingers as it is.
Garnacho and Rashford play on the left. Pellistri has been playing on the right, including this match. So he's competing with Antony and Sancho, and I don't see any reason why he can't take minutes away from Antony/Sancho. Amad is a different story but he's already out first half of the season. Hojlund is our striker...Whose minutes should he be taking? Gernacho? Antony? Rashford? Sancho? What about when Amad returns? Then there's Hojlund to add to the attack.
He looks decent but it'd be best to loan him out for another season or he'll get next to no playing time in the first team
Amad is a different story but he's already out first half of the season.
Is it ridiculous that I think he's competitive with Sancho on the wing?
The coach has said on multiple occasions that he impresses in training.Let's not do this again. We're all asking for him to get more minutes because he's direct and a menace to play against in games, but he doesn't impress the coach in trainings, so he'll play 3 minutes in a League Cup game after leading 9-0 against Rochdale.
Is it ridiculous that I think he's competitive with Sancho on the wing?
The coach has said on multiple occasions that he impresses in training.
I am not hung up on keeping Pellistri at all costs but we need something else on the right. Antony refuses to take players on. It's a back pass 60% of the time.
I don't know, they've been vague about the timeframe but either way, he'll be out for a while presumably. I still haven't seen good justification as to why Pellistri can't get playing time on the right, given the glimpses he has shown. He's direct and tenacious, unlike Sancho. Runs at defenders more often than Antony and isn't as one foot dominant as Antony is.First "part" of the season no? Quite a big difference.
Amad should be challenging for the 10 position when Bruno's knackered or moved back to play as an 8 when we're chasing the game. Both him and Pellistri should be pushing Sancho and Antony to be more consistent. Since ETH seems so stuck on Antony as default RW option though (along with not rotating Bruno to avoid potential burnout, despite his toughness so far), just have to hope Antony's actually learned to mix up his game more, ala the pass for Rashford yesterday rather than the 'one neat trick' , cut inside and left foot aim for top corner, and Pellistri gets an actually useful loan.Garnacho and Rashford play on the left. Pellistri has been playing on the right, including this match. So he's competing with Antony and Sancho, and I don't see any reason why he can't take minutes away from Antony/Sancho. Amad is a different story but he's already out first half of the season. Hojlund is our striker...
He needs a full season of first-team football which he hasn't done in his career so far.
You'd imagine the options will be:I don't understand the notion of loaning him. We don't have enough wingers as it is.
Especially as Rashford and Garnacho can't play on the right.You'd imagine the options will be:
The only way I see it makes sense to keep both would be of Ten Hag plans to play either Sancho or Amad more centrally.
- Rashford
- Garnacho
- Sancho
- Antony
- Amad or Pellistri (the other going on loan)
Why does he need that? Garnacho didn't and contributed nicely. In fact, Pellistri has around 1200 minutes of experience from La Liga, so it's more experience than Garnacho.
It wasn't consistent football and in a team where he barely saw the ball. Garnaho has proven to be a much bigger goal threat at 18, so he got over 1000 minutes at that age in a team like United in his first season.
It boils down to that though. Antony starts and Sancho with his book value and wages is bound to fill in across the frontline when/where possible.No reason why he shouldn’t compete with our other RW’s. It’s not like we have Saka blocking him off, regardless of the price tags of Antony and Sancho neither has made a big impact at the position enough. Of course I don’t have my hopes high, but hopefully if he gets loaned out it’s at least to a good footballing side.
It boils down to that though. Antony starts and Sancho with his book value and wages is bound to fill in across the frontline when/where possible.
That's what we witnessed last season and nothing much has changed other than Amad making a strong case for his own opportunities.
Kid has to go and tear it up elsewhere before he has a hope in hell of getting regular playing time for us.