RedDevilCanuck
Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
He can play league cup and dead rubber CL games. Oh wait....
Not sure how you got that I was 'strangely excited' by my post!
I was merely pointing out the fallacy of some of the posts on here when Pellistri was due to be loaned out.
No agendas, motives or ill feelings towards one of our players, just taking heed of the late Roy Walkers words and saying what I see.
Sancho wasnt on loan to a relegation side. They had a vested interest in developing him and guess what they did
It didn’t make any sense at the time. As I said at the time.In the summer, most people didn't say he wouldn't be playing. They said he could "do better", or would be better served not playing in a relegation scramble.
The loan made sense to me at the time. He got quite a few starts last year and some early sub appearances towards the end. The idea was that he would be able to cement a starting spot at a high level in his second year.
Why are you mean?It didn’t make any sense at the time. As I said at the time.
I even said if he goes back there, we will recall him in January. Won’t be hard to find.
With your logic though, you’d probably get a senior position at United. So there’s a plus for you
Holy cow,Completely off topic but Roy Walker isn't dead! (had to double-check to be fair)
Exactly. They had a "vested interest" to develop him but it took until the 12th game for him to just get a start. In that time Sancho played just 16 minutes of football. Alaves have no particularly need to develop Pellistri and yet after 8 games he has featured in 7 games. That should be an indication that they rate him but your view is that the loan has already failed.
He was 17 with no first team football experience. Yet they put him in and by 19 he was starting every game.
Nothing like Pellistri who has first team football experience and is on loan to a club where he didnt play much before and went back again
Holy cow,
I've been living under a rock for the past two years it seems.
Best dig that signed photo out again and put it back up on the fridge.
Cheers, you've made my day.
If he did not play much, how can he have had much first team experience?
Pellistri has 42 first team games,
I miss when the club was smarter than average joes like me and it makes me sad that they’re so stupidWhy are you mean?
That sounds like the best idea really, we've seen Ethan Laird for example take strides at a lower level in this country, should be the go to for our younger players.
I'd better say something about Pellistri. He doesn't strike me as a player ready for the rigours of first team football in a top league, what about another loan to a lower division to get some minutes under his belt?
I miss when the club was smarter than average joes like me and it makes me sad that they’re so stupid
Well first, you should double check your statistics. He has played 37 games for Penerol. But the level of that league is probably not the same as La Liga or PL. Even if you still want to use that data, he is 19 years old. You have unrealistic expectations if you think a typical 19 year old will come straight from South America and start in every game.
You have already deemed the loan to have failed anyway, even though he has featured in nearly all games . The only thing you can use to justify this view is that he has had game time in the Uruguayan league and in your mind, that means he should be a starter. I just find that quite a weak justification.
Not an exaggeration at all, hes been putting in good performances whereas Pellistri can't get a start for a poor la Liga team, thats just how it is!
So basically what most of us said would happen last Summer will inevitably happen.
Hard to see any logic in the loan and it's yet another thing that makes me question the intelligence of the decision makers at the club
He said it was a bad loan, just phrased as an appeal to the majority.Most of you said what?
He said it was a bad loan, just phrased as an appeal to the majority.
Using the power of hindsight to make the point our club isn't well run.
I recall most people saying they thought the loan was bad because Alaves are in a relegation scrap, not that they thought he'd do a Donny.
Loaning him back to Alaves would be a poor option for his development, as he wouldn't get much game time/startsMost of you said what?
Seriously stop exaggerating, the 2 games I watched off him he was soo poor. One he got hooked at half time and the other around 60min. How has he been putting in solid performances week in week out?Not an exaggeration at all, hes been putting in good performances whereas Pellistri can't get a start for a poor la Liga team, thats just how it is!
Loaning him back to Alaves would be a poor option for his development, as he wouldn't get much game time/starts
Whilst this isn't the place for discussing James' performances, I think you're incorrect with what your saying.Seriously stop exaggerating, the 2 games I watched off him he was soo poor. One he got hooked at half time and the other around 60min. How has he been putting in solid performances week in week out?
Now James isn’t our player he’s been exaggerated, the Caf never fails.
He is a pretty good 19 year old winger, and he showed glimpses of his quality in pre season. How we fail to develop some of these gifted young players sometimes it's also down to the club and not finding the right loans or creating a plan.He’s not very good lads and with the path to the first team being as it is. Was a stupid waste of funds. Hopefully we can recoup that back.
He is a pretty good 19 year old winger, and he showed glimpses of his quality in pre season. How we fail to develop some of these gifted young players sometimes it's also down to the club and not finding the right loans or creating a plan.
What progress have we made in the last 8-9 years?Apologies. He’s not very good for a Manchester United. Maybe he’ll play for a Lazio one day. He’s not making it here though. Unless we really fail to make progress as a club.
You maybe right that’s he’s not that good at 19, but doesn’t meant he won’t be great in a couple of years.He’s not very good lads and with the path to the first team being as it is. Was a stupid waste of funds. Hopefully we can recoup that back.
Apologies to the beacon of footballing knowledgeNo you're describing what's happening now. Almost no one said that prior to it happening.
Sweet Jesus.If we still had James we would have beaten Villa and Everton, the total failure of our wide players to track back is killing us and that is one thing he does better than anyone we have left at the club.
Sweet Jesus.
I respect your opinionWhilst this isn't the place for discussing James' performances, I think you're incorrect with what your saying.
He's been good for Leeds, especially against Watford. He's had four starts in 5 games since signing.
I'm not exaggerating, merely stating the obvious, and if it makes you feel better I was one of those stating we shouldn't get rid of him.
But anyway, that's all for a different thread.
We're back to being a club consistently in the top finishers.What progress have we made in the last 8-9 years?
Loaning him back to Alaves would be a poor option for his development, as he wouldn't get much game time/starts
Ah yes, Dan James on the pitch would've made sure Fred took out Demarai Gray and then made sure Shaw tracked back with Townsend.If we still had James we would have beaten Villa and Everton, the total failure of our wide players to track back is killing us and that is one thing he does better than anyone we have left at the club.
You maybe right that’s he’s not that good at 19, but doesn’t meant he won’t be great in a couple of years.
A lot of the great players developed in their early 20s.