Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 13,819
You answered your own question pal6 starts last season and ten sub appearances, 5 starts and 7 sub appearances this season so far. So how is he seeing no game time?
You answered your own question pal6 starts last season and ten sub appearances, 5 starts and 7 sub appearances this season so far. So how is he seeing no game time?
The quality of posters has really fallen off the cliff recently. They make crap up without even doing research or just saying things they feel emotionally. He had a relatively successful loan otherwise why would anyone pay take him back? Yet people make crap up or blame Ole for his poor 2nd loan.
I wouldn't be surprised if last season he had more game time? Because I remember him actually getting a run of games once he was settled and only being put on the bench for 30 min sub appearances near the end of the season.It's just a simple point that he's had little game time. Which was fairly predictable given how the back end of last season went for him.
Just send him somewhere he'll play every week. It shouldn't be difficult.
It's not only that he's not a starter, Alaves plays shit football. Relegation defensive football where Pellistri is chasing the opposition rather than dribbling, taking in players and creating chances.
I don't think playing there is going to help him at all, such negative football won't develop him.
Just look at the stats per game:
6.9 passes
0.6 dribbles
0.4 shots
0.3 key passes
0.1 crosses
0.1 long balls
0 through balls
0 assists
0 goals
0.07 xA per 90/ 0.43 xG in the season
0.05 xG per 90/ 0.31 xA in the season
What the feck is that? We are mid season and he's not even created half a chance or enough xG to actually score. Looking at xG and xA stats it's like watching a game stats, only to find out it's his whole season ffs.
It's like he's not even there. He barely touches the ball. We should recall him immediately and loan to a team that actually helps him to develop.
Likely not, but his development is still the club's responsibility and it's also in their interest to get a good fee for him.Of he's just incredibly over rated perhaps???? If he's not doing the business at that level he's never going to make the grade here.
There's been plenty of loans in the past where the flashy attacking types get sacrificed for hard working, dogged workers in relegation battles.Of he's just incredibly over rated perhaps???? If he's not doing the business at that level he's never going to make the grade here.
Facundo Pellistri is attracting interest from a number of Championship clubs as #mufc consider whether or not to terminate his current loan spell at Alaves
A number of clubs have already shown an interest in signing Pellistri on loan if he does return to the club this month, though the decision is still expected to lie with the Spanish club
[RichFay]
I defended this loan, I don't like to judge beforehand and he played quite a lot earlier despite them being shit.. but now.. It's time to bring him back, and loan him out to a club in The Championship.
They can't register playersSend him to Derby on loan.
Who remembers angelo henriquez
This is a classic signing that exposes why United has been in this mess for so many years.
Not good enough and will never be. What was the point ? No one will ever know why United wasted millions here.
Bullocks. You can get it wrong when signing talented kids for the academy.This is a classic signing that exposes why United has been in this mess for so many years.
Not good enough and will never be. What was the point ? No one will ever know why United wasted millions here.
@AngeloHenriquez who could forget him!Who remembers angelo henriquez
Who remembers angelo henriquez
Yeah this feels very similar to that.
Who remembers angelo henriquez
Yeah, they have similarities but IMO Pellistri is much more talented. I think he'll have a good career in a top 7 league but not at United.
This is a classic signing that exposes why United has been in this mess for so many years.
Not good enough and will never be. What was the point ? No one will ever know why United wasted millions here.
Maybe it's hard to get emerging talent right? This guy and Diallo were teenagers when we signed them. They still need time.
I'll have you know at the time Henriquez was rated very highly as he scored 11 in 17 having just turned 17 playing mens football, shows you it takes far more than just talent
I think they probably considered them low risk. If they turn good the club got a WC talent early, if they're average we can probably make some money on them anyway. Chelsea did it with talented youth for years. It's not the best approach, but it's better than no approach. If as a club we were a little better at selling players it'd be a no brainer. We held onto Lingard, Periera, Fosu Mensah, Taunzebe etc all too long. These young players were all given time, at some point it was clear they wouldn't make the grade, we should have sold them quicker.Why sign both at the same time, and then Sancho (who is not much older than them)? Amad looks really talented, but Pellistri not so much. Think he will be okay a few levels down from United.
Be interesting to know how many people actually watch him play week on week.The way a lot of you guys write off players is funny to me, am sure that had it been that Bellingham is in our academy, you guys would have written him off as not being ready for first team football.
This guy is talented, give him time.
Yeah, he's a very talented lad. Just a shame we organised such a stupid loan for him. I love his dribbling technique, it's very elegant and shows he possesses a lot of class.The way a lot of you guys write off players is funny to me, am sure that had it been that Bellingham is in our academy, you guys would have written him off as not being ready for first team football.
This guy is talented, give him time.
Another 90 minutes sat on the bench yesterday. I am not seeing any kind of plan for him at the moment and it seems madness that we are already in the last week of the window and we seem content to let this situation drift. It looks for all the world as though we have written him off already as we cannot possibly think he is getting any benefit from this loan and the lack of action suggests we may be looking to just move him on permanently in the summer.
Exactly… That whole window and last day signings exposes the complete disarray United has at decision making level.Why sign both at the same time, and then Sancho (who is not much older than them)? Amad looks really talented, but Pellistri not so much. Think he will be okay a few levels down from United.
Should have left him at Peñarol, as the club had requested. Top team locally, good coaching, playing along with experienced internationals winding down their careers, guaranteed continental tournos, would have got plenty of minutes for the NT at the Copa América... Nah, collect splinters in Spain instead.
This is a guy who had his debut aged 17, halfway through a season, yet still made the League's First XI and was voted as the Fans Player of the Year (league, not a club award).